From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-205481-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18698 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2007 07:57:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 18690 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Oct 2007 07:57:04 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Oct 2007 07:56:58 +0000
Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) 	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) 	(No client certificate requested) 	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31F622EBD; 	Tue,  9 Oct 2007 09:56:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 07:57:00 -0000
From: Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PRs 33693, 33695 and 33697
In-Reply-To: <de8d50360710080942m437bb349l40a039b3f8a260d0@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710090956420.4202@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710081722020.4432@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>  <de8d50360710080942m437bb349l40a039b3f8a260d0@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00466.txt.bz2

On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Andrew Pinski wrote:

> On 10/8/07, Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> >         * gcc.dg/pr33693.c: New testcase.
> >         * gcc.dg/pr33695.c: Likewise.
> >         * gcc.dg/pr33697.c: Likewise.
> 
> I think these tests should have been in torture.

I thought about this, and types are verified only after gimplification,
so optimization doesn't matter.

Richard.