From: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC (was: Re: [vta] don't let debug insns get in the way of simple vect reduction)
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711071815540.23011@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <or7ikuv6ex.fsf_-_@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Hi,
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > With the different approach I and Matz started (and to which we didn't
> > yet spend enough time to get debug information actually output - but I
> > hope we'll get there soon), on the tree level the extra information is
> > stored in a bitmap per SSA_NAME (where necessary).
>
> This will fail on a very fundamental level. Consider code such as:
>
> f(int x, int y) {
> int c;
> /* other vars */
>
> c = x;
> do_something_with(c, ...); // doesn't touch x or y
>
> c = y;
> do_something_else_with(c, ...); // doesn't touch x or y
> }
>
> where do_something_*with are actually complex computations, be that
> explicit code, be it macros or inlined functions.
>
> This can (and should) be trivially optimized to:
>
> f(int x, int y) {
> /* other vars */
>
> do_something_with(x, ...); // doesn't touch x or y
>
> do_something_else_with(y, ...); // doesn't touch x or y
> }
>
> But now, if I 'print c' in a debugger in the middle of one of the
> do_something_*with expansions, what do I get?
>
> With the approach I'm implementing, you should get x and y at the
> appropriate points, even though variable c doesn't really exist any
> more.
>
> With your approach, what will you get?
x and y at the appropriate part. Whatever holds 'x' at a point (SSA name,
pseudo or mem) will also mention that it holds 'c'. At a later point
whichever holds 'y' will also mention in holds 'c' .
> There isn't any assignment to x or y you could hook your notes to.
But there are _places_ for x and y. Those places can and are also
associated with c.
> Even if you were to set up side representations to model the additional
> variables that end up mapped to the incoming arguments, you'd have 'c'
> in both, and at the entry point. How would you tell?
I don't understand the question.
Ciao,
Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-07 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-05 8:28 [vta] don't let debug insns get in the way of simple vect reduction Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-05 11:27 ` Richard Guenther
2007-11-07 7:52 ` Designs for better debug info in GCC (was: Re: [vta] don't let debug insns get in the way of simple vect reduction) Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-07 16:16 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-11-07 19:11 ` Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-07 22:57 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-11-07 23:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-08 0:00 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-08 0:15 ` David Edelsohn
2007-11-08 0:35 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-08 5:14 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-08 18:28 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-22 23:07 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2007-11-22 23:13 ` Richard Guenther
2007-11-23 20:53 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2007-11-24 1:53 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-24 15:02 ` Robert Dewar
2007-11-08 5:15 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-08 18:18 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-08 19:46 ` Andrew Pinski
2007-11-08 20:39 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-09 8:39 ` Robert Dewar
2007-11-08 5:44 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-08 18:37 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-08 19:13 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-08 19:13 ` David Daney
2007-11-08 19:17 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-09 2:09 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-12 4:49 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-12 18:45 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-12 18:49 ` Joe Buck
2007-11-25 6:57 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-25 12:09 ` Richard Kenner
2007-11-12 18:53 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-11-24 2:12 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-13 10:30 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-24 1:54 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-13 15:30 ` Michael Matz
2007-11-24 2:00 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-26 21:01 ` Michael Matz
2007-11-27 5:31 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-27 20:31 ` Michael Matz
2007-11-27 21:44 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-08 9:54 ` Richard Guenther
2007-11-08 5:01 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-08 18:15 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-08 19:13 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-11-08 20:27 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-08 21:26 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-11-09 9:53 ` Robert Dewar
2007-11-12 5:36 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-12 17:34 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-12 17:54 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-24 1:55 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-26 1:08 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-12-05 14:22 ` Diego Novillo
2007-12-05 22:10 ` Joe Buck
2007-12-15 21:41 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-16 3:15 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-16 13:09 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-17 1:27 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-17 4:20 ` Joe Buck
2007-12-17 8:13 ` Geert Bosch
2007-12-18 1:24 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-18 1:29 ` Joe Buck
2007-12-18 4:40 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-18 7:42 ` Robert Dewar
2007-12-18 8:09 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-18 14:01 ` Robert Dewar
2007-12-18 21:20 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-18 7:35 ` Robert Dewar
2007-12-18 8:34 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-17 18:36 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-17 17:59 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-17 18:02 ` Diego Novillo
2007-12-17 20:34 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-17 20:45 ` Diego Novillo
2007-12-18 1:02 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-18 1:14 ` Diego Novillo
2007-12-18 5:21 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-18 9:10 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-18 13:20 ` Diego Novillo
2007-12-18 15:42 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-18 22:43 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-19 6:07 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-19 8:39 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-19 16:12 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-19 16:36 ` Andrew MacLeod
2007-12-19 19:49 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-19 20:00 ` Andrew MacLeod
2007-12-19 20:57 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-19 20:07 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-19 22:00 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-20 9:26 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-20 17:04 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-12-20 20:53 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-19 20:27 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-18 23:35 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-19 5:50 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-19 16:35 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-12-19 19:46 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-12-19 20:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-31 15:40 ` Richard Guenther
2007-12-16 21:42 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-11-09 9:55 ` Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
2007-11-09 11:08 ` Robert Dewar
2007-11-08 8:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-11-07 17:20 ` Michael Matz [this message]
2007-11-07 18:45 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-08 10:23 ` Michael Matz
2007-11-08 14:02 ` Robert Dewar
2007-11-08 15:13 ` H.J. Lu
2007-11-08 16:11 ` Michael Matz
2007-11-08 17:48 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-09 12:46 ` Michael Matz
2007-11-12 18:31 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-13 13:56 ` Michael Matz
2007-11-24 2:34 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-26 20:56 ` Michael Matz
2007-11-27 5:30 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-08 16:37 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-09 1:26 ` Robert Dewar
2007-11-12 16:56 ` Alexandre Oliva
2007-11-09 1:26 ` Joe Buck
2007-11-09 14:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-09 17:06 ` Robert Dewar
2007-11-08 16:32 ` Alexandre Oliva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0711071815540.23011@wotan.suse.de \
--to=matz@suse.de \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).