From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8810 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2008 22:29:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 8802 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2008 22:29:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:29:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 24603 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2008 22:29:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 10 Mar 2008 22:29:34 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JYqUv-0002PO-6L; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:29:33 +0000 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:29:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Kai Tietz cc: Danny Smith , GCC Patches , ktietz70@googlemail.com, NightStrike Subject: Re: Ping - old patch from April - mingw support for I32/I64 MS printf formatters to c-format.c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00658.txt.bz2 On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Kai Tietz wrote: > > Note that this part of the patch will need reviewing by a MinGW > > maintainer. > > Danny, could you do that? > > Is this ok for apply to trunk? The C front end parts of the patch are OK. As noted before, the MinGW parts (in particular the tables and the new testcases) will need reviewing by a MinGW maintainer. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com