From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7040 invoked by alias); 16 May 2008 00:06:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 7031 invoked by uid 22791); 16 May 2008 00:06:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 May 2008 00:05:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 13585 invoked from network); 16 May 2008 00:05:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 16 May 2008 00:05:36 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JwnS3-0002JK-KK; Fri, 16 May 2008 00:05:35 +0000 Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 02:21:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Mark Mitchell cc: Bernd Schmidt , Jie Zhang , GCC Patches , rdsandiford@googlemail.com Subject: Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES In-Reply-To: <482CC108.3000303@codesourcery.com> Message-ID: References: <46EFBCC1.6070200@gmail.com> <46EFC383.7020503@t-online.de> <46EFC9E9.7090201@gmail.com> <46EFCEF9.3060304@t-online.de> <46EFCF7A.2080704@gmail.com> <46EFD236.6080907@t-online.de> <46EFDA4D.3070006@gmail.com> <474C0C52.8050503@t-online.de> <474C8FA4.2040603@codesourcery.com> <474C95BA.1060807@t-online.de> <474C96C1.7010208@codesourcery.com> <474C98AA.50105@t-online.de> <474C9A65.2060902@codesourcery.com> <474C9B33.8060503@t-online.de> <474C9CBD.2070708@codesourcery.com> <87fxyqdc45.fsf@firetop.home> <474D943C.4030106@codesourcery.com> <877ik0aerh.fsf@firetop.home> <482CA836.6050801@t-online.de> <878wybdwu7.fsf@firetop.home> <482CBFD9.3050201@t-online.de> <482CC108.3000303@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00951.txt.bz2 On Thu, 15 May 2008, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Bernd Schmidt wrote: > > > I've now checked in the libstdc++-v3 patch, which is a reasonably obvious > > bug fix. I've never had an opinion on whether other targets ought to fail > > link tests, hence I'm not really interested in pursuing the other part of > > the patch. I'll leave that to you or Mark, if you wish. > > I think the libstdc++-v3 change is indeed pretty obvious. As I understand it, it's also a regression fix that should go on 4.3 branch as well. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com