From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-226148-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25444 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2008 23:24:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 25433 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2008 23:24:00 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:23:24 +0000
Received: (qmail 18612 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2008 23:23:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 28 Aug 2008 23:23:22 -0000
Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) 	by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.68) 	(envelope-from <joseph@codesourcery.com>) 	id 1KYqpk-0001CS-N6; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:23:20 +0000
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:15:00 -0000
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Manuel_L=F3pez-Ib=E1=F1ez?= <lopezibanez@gmail.com>
cc: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [C/C++] PR 13358 long long and C++ do not mix well
In-Reply-To: <6c33472e0808281543w5d464fe6r1fa5e584797ac46c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0808282321560.4350@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <6c33472e0808281543w5d464fe6r1fa5e584797ac46c@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1152306461-2113347063-1219965800=:4350"
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg02331.txt.bz2

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

---1152306461-2113347063-1219965800=:4350
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Content-length: 715

On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Manuel L=F3pez-Ib=E1=F1ez wrote:

> CPP and the FE were using different semantics. invoke.texi said that
> Wlong-long was the default. This was not correct. It was the default
> for CPP but -Wno-long-long was the default for the FE. Now there is
> only one semantic: the one from the FE.
>=20
> However, we were inhibiting warning even if the user requested it
> through Wlong-long. Now explicit Wlong-long (or Wno-long-long)
> overrides everything else, except in system headers.

If you allow -Wlong-long to have an effect in C99 mode, -std=3Dc99=20
-pedantic-errors -Wlong-long should give the diagnostics as warnings not=20
errors.  Does it?

--=20
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com=

---1152306461-2113347063-1219965800=:4350--