From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18590 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2009 15:51:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 18581 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Apr 2009 15:51:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_73 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cantor2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:51:24 +0000 Received: from Relay1.suse.de (relay-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF9E8980B; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:51:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:51:00 -0000 From: Michael Matz To: David Edelsohn Cc: gcc-patches Subject: Re: [RFA] expand from SSA form (1/2) In-Reply-To: <303e1d290904270807g2dc51773y79d7f5b3e5a92d2a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <303e1d290904270711s4c3d9ec3k5c0307bd99b9c90@mail.gmail.com> <303e1d290904270807g2dc51773y79d7f5b3e5a92d2a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="168427776-846918797-1240847481=:29566" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg02132.txt.bz2 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --168427776-846918797-1240847481=:29566 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-length: 789 Hi, On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, David Edelsohn wrote: > > This confusion with the numbers seems indeed related to PR39922.  If > > you can test the below patch on powerpc that would be nice.  I know > > that it fixes the PR on i686-linux where something similar happens. > > A quick test of the patch does not fix the failure on AIX. I will try a > complete bootstrap in case the bug was causing other miscompilations. Hmpf. There's another problem (promoted parameters), which might also cause this. The patch I just sent to Andreas Krebbel should fix that one. If it doesn't help AIX/darwin I fear I need a testcase. There probably are some failures in execute.exp which also would be miscompiled, that might be easier to extract than the miscompilation itself. Ciao, Michael. --168427776-846918797-1240847481=:29566--