From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29719 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2009 20:56:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 29666 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Sep 2009 20:56:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_65,SPF_FAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx20.gnu.org (HELO mx20.gnu.org) (199.232.41.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:56:09 +0000 Received: from [65.74.133.4] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlUD1-00036D-Mr for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:56:07 -0400 Received: (qmail 31789 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2009 20:56:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 9 Sep 2009 20:56:05 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlUCx-0000mF-Ta; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:56:03 +0000 Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:56:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Richard Henderson cc: Jakub Jelinek , Matthias Klose , Alexandre Oliva , Nathan Froyd , GCC Patches , Paolo Carlini , GCJ-patches , Ralf Wildenhues Subject: Re: [patch] PR40134, use a linker script on arm-linux to link with -lgcc_s -lgcc In-Reply-To: <4AA806F6.6000306@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <4A530F5C.4040500@ubuntu.com> <20090707091425.GB4462@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <4A5B32BB.5010308@ubuntu.com> <20090909112436.GV14664@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <20090909132541.GX14664@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <4AA806F6.6000306@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Detected-Operating-System: by mx20.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00649.txt.bz2 On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 09/09/2009 06:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Thanks. Anyway, this new t-slibgcc-libgcc has to be either in gcc/config/ > > together with t-slibgcc-elf-ver, or t-slibgcc-elf-ver would need to be moved > > over to libgcc/config too (as variable references are resolved at > > libgcc.mvars creation time). > > Personally, I'm all for moving everything that can be > moved to the libgcc subdir. So am I, but a lot of the settings are heavily entangled with each other and so need migrating at once and it's very fiddly to make sure no settings are accidentally changed for every target. I think is still essentially current, as far as it goes; most of the startfiles migration described there has yet to happen for most targets. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com