From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-286425-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30596 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2011 22:47:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 30575 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2011 22:47:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:47:14 +0000
Received: (qmail 27114 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2011 22:47:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2)  by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 7 Mar 2011 22:47:12 -0000
Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost)	by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.72)	(envelope-from <joseph@codesourcery.com>)	id 1PwjCo-0006fF-Pi; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:47:10 +0000
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:47:00 -0000
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Dr Andrew John Hughes <ahughes@redhat.com>
cc: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,     java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: avoid useless if-before-free tests
In-Reply-To: <20110307195204.GL9339@rivendell.middle-earth.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1103072246370.24917@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <87zkp9zmq0.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1103051908320.3878@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20110307195204.GL9339@rivendell.middle-earth.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00338.txt.bz2

On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:

> > http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html says Classpath changes should go 
> > via Classpath upstream, not directly into GCC.  I don't know if that's 
> > still accurate.
> > 
> 
> That's still true.  This seems to be the first message I've received in this
> thread, so I'm not even aware of what these changes are.  Were the earlier
> messages not sent to this list?

The original patch went only to gcc-patches.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00252.html

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com