From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14280 invoked by alias); 10 May 2011 15:00:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 14272 invoked by uid 22791); 10 May 2011 15:00:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 15:00:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 18603 invoked from network); 10 May 2011 15:00:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 10 May 2011 15:00:12 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QJoPz-0003o8-Fs; Tue, 10 May 2011 15:00:11 +0000 Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:25:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Nathan Froyd cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, dnovillo@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] use build_function_type less in c-family and LTO In-Reply-To: <20110510131438.GT23480@codesourcery.com> Message-ID: References: <20110510131438.GT23480@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00750.txt.bz2 On Tue, 10 May 2011, Nathan Froyd wrote: > gcc/c-family/ > * c-common.c (def_fn_type): Don't call build_function_type, call > build_function_type_vec or build_varargs_function_type_vec instead. > (c_common_nodes_and_builtins): Likewise. The c-family changes are OK. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com