Hi,

On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:

> > +         tree base = get_base_address (lhs);
> 
> Probably easier and more complete to do
> 
>             if (lhs && TREE_CODE (lhs) != SSA_NAME)
>               {
>                  tree base = get_base_address (lhs);
> 
> 
> I don't like the patch too much, but it looks reasonable.  At least 
> reverting your patch doesn't really fix anything.
> 
> Any opinions from others?

It's ugly.  But ... well, IMHO such hacks are acceptable for released 
branches.


Ciao,
Michael.