From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-297680-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14284 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2011 12:40:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 14110 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jul 2011 12:40:00 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_GM,TW_PM
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:39:46 +0000
Received: (qmail 26385 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2011 12:39:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2)  by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 22 Jul 2011 12:39:45 -0000
Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost)	by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.72)	(envelope-from <joseph@codesourcery.com>)	id 1QkF15-0002m0-PV; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:39:43 +0000
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:21:00 -0000
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: PING: PATCH: PR target/46770: Use .init_array/.fini_array sections
In-Reply-To: <20110722123042.GB2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107221238250.9815@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <AANLkTik8RB9N52grGxMbpj14jwzoLB0oRYdKnmAXyESu@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimtcwsV8Af7a60Jz57g-J38oR==+Ew7BqQvMbJm@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikBAnrYSRiRtaPXNat77sEgdSEK1Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=M3HKXJa7t3ayavtWMgRPQ6t2row@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin34R=s+4zPf7oijd_xzd00xjOLCQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikfADfNqvuzcsru_RjE8jyiWjFvPw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=vTT_9j33U5FVNVasqkdt_=qCOyQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinfhzGcg6oBVeV_LXRQSN1gmtU70g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTint+SNsmQxOz-4xk0rrhRPc9L8J8g@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOof=V4c89715u-Z=zG8kqADrupMaemnjuYPJA-xPQaKxg@mail.gmail.com> <20110722123042.GB2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg01949.txt.bz2

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:59:28AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > @@ -2660,6 +2664,7 @@ esac
> >  case ${target} in
> >  i[34567]86-*-linux* | x86_64-*-linux*)
> >  	tmake_file="${tmake_file} i386/t-pmm_malloc i386/t-i386"
> > +	use_initfini_array=yes
> >  	;;
> >  i[34567]86-*-* | x86_64-*-*)
> >  	tmake_file="${tmake_file} i386/t-gmm_malloc i386/t-i386"
> 
> What is i?86/x86_64 specific on it?  Don't most other glibc targets
> want to use it too, perhaps with some arch specific tweaks?

I already said in the PR that it should be enabled by default for all ELF 
targets except any for which it proves necessary to disable it.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com