public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/4] ARM 64 bit sync atomic operations [V2]
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1110031553230.12309@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E8973C6.90703@redhat.com>

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:

> On 09/30/2011 08:54 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> > 
> >> On 26 July 2011 10:01, Dr. David Alan Gilbert <david.gilbert@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +
> >>> +extern unsigned int __write(int fd, const void *buf, unsigned int count);
> >>
> >> Why are we using __write instead of write?
> > 
> > Because plain write is in the user's namespace in ISO C.  See what I said 
> > in <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00084.html> - the 
> > alternative is hardcoding the syscall number and using the syscall 
> > directly.
> 
> That would be better, no?  Unless __write is part of the glibc API,
> which AFAIK it isn't.

It's exported at version GLIBC_2.0 (not GLIBC_PRIVATE) under the comment 
"functions used in inline functions or macros", although I don't actually 
see any such functions or macros in current glibc headers.  I think being 
under a public version means you can rely on it staying there.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-03 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-01 15:53 [Patch 0/3] ARM 64 bit atomic operations Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-07-01 15:55 ` [Patch 1/3] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-07-12 21:24   ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-07-13  9:18     ` David Gilbert
2011-07-01 15:56 ` [Patch 2/3] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-07-01 16:03   ` Richard Henderson
2011-07-01 17:08     ` David Gilbert
2011-07-01 19:38   ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-07-04 22:27     ` David Gilbert
2011-07-01 15:57 ` [Patch 3/3] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-07-12 15:31   ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-07-12 12:55 ` [Patch 0/3] " Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-07-26  9:14   ` [Patch 0/4] ARM 64 bit sync atomic operations [V2] Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-07-26  9:16     ` [Patch 1/4] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-07-26  9:18       ` [Patch 2/4] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-07-26  9:23         ` [Patch 3/4] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-07-26  9:24           ` [Patch 4/4] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-08-01 15:43             ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-08-17 13:07           ` [Patch 3/4] " Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-09-30 18:04         ` [Patch 2/4] " Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-09-30 18:29           ` H.J. Lu
2011-10-03 13:22             ` David Gilbert
2011-09-30 20:51           ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-10-03  8:35             ` Andrew Haley
2011-10-03 14:04               ` David Gilbert
2011-10-03 15:56               ` Joseph S. Myers [this message]
2011-10-03 16:07                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-09-30 14:25       ` [Patch 1/4] " Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-10-03 12:53         ` David Gilbert
2011-10-03 15:18           ` David Gilbert
2011-10-06 17:52             ` [Patch 0/5] ARM 64 bit sync atomic operations [V3] Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-10-06 17:53               ` [Patch 1/5] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-10-06 17:54                 ` [Patch 2/5] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-10-06 17:55                   ` [Patch 3/5] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-10-06 18:03                     ` [Patch 4/5] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-10-06 18:03                       ` [Patch 5/5] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2011-10-12  4:51                         ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-10-12  5:06                         ` Mike Stump
2011-10-12  0:53                       ` [Patch 4/5] " Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-10-12  2:35                     ` [Patch 3/5] " Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-10-12  0:52                   ` [Patch 2/5] " Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-10-12  1:45                   ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2011-10-12  0:51                 ` [Patch 1/5] " Ramana Radhakrishnan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1110031553230.12309@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
    --to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).