From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16434 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2012 14:21:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 16415 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2012 14:21:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:21:00 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1SCXGc-0004aR-MW from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:20:58 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:20:56 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from ) id 1SCXGZ-00023Y-JC; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:20:55 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:21:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: "H.J. Lu" cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Remove MaskExists property from option handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg01726.txt.bz2 On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, H.J. Lu wrote: > The same set of macros are provided. The only differences are the > order of bits used and macro definitions. I am doing a full bootstrap and > test on Linux/x86-64. OK for trunk if there are no regressions? OK. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com