From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4510 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2013 16:42:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4499 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2013 16:42:40 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:42:40 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1V3qWm-0006nc-5P from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:42:32 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:42:31 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:42:29 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V3qWi-0004nW-Hd; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:42:28 +0000 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:48:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Andrew MacLeod CC: gcc-patches , , Richard Henderson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add atomic type qualifier In-Reply-To: <51F69859.3090907@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <51F2AEB1.60408@redhat.com> <51F6836F.6080400@redhat.com> <51F69859.3090907@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg01411.txt.bz2 On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > complex I hadn't thought about until just now, I'll have to look. I know we > can deal with parts on complex sometimes. Hopefully at gimplification time > we still have the whole complex reference and if we just take care of that > with the atomic builtins, we'll maintain the entire thing as we need. You have things in a fairly complicated form, building up COMPLEX_EXPRs out of operations on the individual parts of the complex operands. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com