From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7170 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2013 21:27:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7154 invoked by uid 89); 8 Nov 2013 21:27:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from Unknown (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:27:02 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1VetZm-0003ei-I5 from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:26:46 -0800 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:26:46 -0800 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:26:44 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VetZi-0004Fm-V6; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:26:43 +0000 Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:33:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Uros Bizjak CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: Update soft-fp from glibc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00968.txt.bz2 On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Uros Bizjak wrote: > Hello! > > > I've applied this patch to update libgcc's copy of soft-fp from > > glibc. There are lots of coding standards fixes, but also various bug > > fixes; I've added testcases for various of the fixed bugs illustrating > > them for __float128. > > Is there really no way to get those "missing prototypes" warning fixed? libgcc/config/t-softfp has a setting using -Wno-missing-prototypes - I don't know offhand why it's not being used. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com