From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [v3] build failure from automated checker.....
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 11:44:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010609114317.24671J-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>
References: <200106091636.MAA29383@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00544.html

I don't know what this is. 

> ../../../../libstdc++-v3/include/c_std/bits/std_cmath.h: In function `double std::pow(double, int)':
> ../../../../libstdc++-v3/include/c_std/bits/std_cmath.h:419: `double std::pow(double, int)' conflicts with previous using declaration `double pow(double, int)'
> 
> I see this in /xxx/gnu/gcc-3.0/objdir/gcc/include/math.h:
> 
> extern "C" {
>      ...
>      inline double pow(double __d,int __expon) {
> 	 return pow(__d,(double)__expon);
>      }

I don't think the above is in C99