From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3167 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2011 17:06:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 3152 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2011 17:06:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.141) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:06:15 +0000 Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:54558) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1Q9KZ4-0004I6-Qa (Exim 4.72) (return-path ); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:06:14 +0100 Received: from prayer by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1Q9KZ4-00082R-6I (Exim 4.67) (return-path ); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:06:14 +0100 Received: from [83.67.89.123] by webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.3); 11 Apr 2011 18:06:14 +0100 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:06:00 -0000 From: "N.M. Maclaren" To: fortran@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Implement stack arrays even for unknown sizes Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20110409100809.BF9CD3BE18@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00775.txt.bz2 On Apr 11 2011, H.J. Lu wrote: > >Is that possible to raise stack limit when -fstack-arrays is used? In some systems, yes. In others (including most Unices), not without evil contortions that will assuredly break something else (like debuggers and some MPIs). Regards, Nick Maclaren.