From: "Jiang, Haochen" <haochen.jiang@intel.com>
To: HAO CHEN GUI <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH-1v4, expand] Enable vector mode for compare_by_pieces [PR111449]
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 08:49:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SA1PR11MB5946D42F623A73D9923C3D3BECDFA@SA1PR11MB5946.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SA1PR11MB5946D4B7FDBD7C813F09BC41ECDFA@SA1PR11MB5946.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
It seems that the mail got caught elsewhere and did not send into gcc-patches
mailing thread. Resending that.
Thx,
Haochen
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiang, Haochen
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 4:43 PM
To: HAO CHEN GUI <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>; Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH-1v4, expand] Enable vector mode for compare_by_pieces [PR111449]
Hi Haochen Gui,
It seems that the commit caused lots of test case fail on x86 platforms:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2023-October/078379.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2023-October/078380.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2023-October/078381.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2023-October/078382.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2023-October/078383.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/2023-October/078384.html
Please help verify that if we need some testcase change or we get bug here.
A simple reproducer under build folder is:
make check RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=g++.target/i386/pr80566-2.C --target_board='unix{-m64\ -march=cascadelake,-m32\ -march=cascadelake,-m32,-m64}'"
Thx,
Haochen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HAO CHEN GUI <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2023 9:30 AM
> To: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
> Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH-1v4, expand] Enable vector mode for
> compare_by_pieces [PR111449]
>
> Committed as r14-4835.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f08ca5903c7a02b450b93143467f70b9fd8e0085
>
> Thanks
> Gui Haochen
>
> 在 2023/10/20 16:49, Richard Sandiford 写道:
> > HAO CHEN GUI <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> >> Hi,
> >> Vector mode instructions are efficient for compare on some targets.
> >> This patch enables vector mode for compare_by_pieces. Two help
> >> functions are added to check if vector mode is available for
> >> certain by pieces operations and if if optabs exists for the mode
> >> and certain by pieces operations. One member is added in class
> >> op_by_pieces_d to record the type of operations.
> >>
> >> The test case is in the second patch which is rs6000 specific.
> >>
> >> Compared to last version, the main change is to add a target hook
> >> check - scalar_mode_supported_p when retrieving the available
> >> scalar modes. The mode which is not supported for a target should be skipped.
> >> (e.g. TImode on ppc). Also some function names and comments are
> >> refined according to reviewer's advice.
> >>
> >> Bootstrapped and tested on x86 and powerpc64-linux BE and LE with
> >> no regressions.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Gui Haochen
> >>
> >> ChangeLog
> >> Expand: Enable vector mode for by pieces compares
> >>
> >> Vector mode compare instructions are efficient for equality compare
> >> on rs6000. This patch refactors the codes of by pieces operation to
> >> enable vector mode for compare.
> >>
> >> gcc/
> >> PR target/111449
> >> * expr.cc (can_use_qi_vectors): New function to return true if
> >> we know how to implement OP using vectors of bytes.
> >> (qi_vector_mode_supported_p): New function to check if optabs
> >> exists for the mode and certain by pieces operations.
> >> (widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size): Replace the second argument
> >> with the type of by pieces operations. Call can_use_qi_vectors
> >> and qi_vector_mode_supported_p to do the check. Call
> >> scalar_mode_supported_p to check if the scalar mode is supported.
> >> (by_pieces_ninsns): Pass the type of by pieces operation to
> >> widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size.
> >> (class op_by_pieces_d): Remove m_qi_vector_mode. Add m_op to
> >> record the type of by pieces operations.
> >> (op_by_pieces_d::op_by_pieces_d): Change last argument to the
> >> type of by pieces operations, initialize m_op with it. Pass
> >> m_op to function widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size.
> >> (op_by_pieces_d::get_usable_mode): Pass m_op to function
> >> widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size.
> >> (op_by_pieces_d::smallest_fixed_size_mode_for_size): Call
> >> can_use_qi_vectors and qi_vector_mode_supported_p to do the
> >> check.
> >> (op_by_pieces_d::run): Pass m_op to function
> >> widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size.
> >> (move_by_pieces_d::move_by_pieces_d): Set m_op to
> MOVE_BY_PIECES.
> >> (store_by_pieces_d::store_by_pieces_d): Set m_op with the op.
> >> (can_store_by_pieces): Pass the type of by pieces operations to
> >> widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size.
> >> (clear_by_pieces): Initialize class store_by_pieces_d with
> >> CLEAR_BY_PIECES.
> >> (compare_by_pieces_d::compare_by_pieces_d): Set m_op to
> >> COMPARE_BY_PIECES.
> >
> > OK, thanks. And thanks for your patience.
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >> patch.diff
> >> diff --git a/gcc/expr.cc b/gcc/expr.cc index
> >> 2c9930ec674..ad5f9dd8ec2 100644
> >> --- a/gcc/expr.cc
> >> +++ b/gcc/expr.cc
> >> @@ -988,18 +988,44 @@ alignment_for_piecewise_move (unsigned int
> max_pieces, unsigned int align)
> >> return align;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -/* Return the widest QI vector, if QI_MODE is true, or integer mode
> >> - that is narrower than SIZE bytes. */
> >> +/* Return true if we know how to implement OP using vectors of
> >> +bytes. */ static bool can_use_qi_vectors (by_pieces_operation op)
> >> +{
> >> + return (op == COMPARE_BY_PIECES
> >> + || op == SET_BY_PIECES
> >> + || op == CLEAR_BY_PIECES);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/* Return true if optabs exists for the mode and certain by pieces
> >> + operations. */
> >> +static bool
> >> +qi_vector_mode_supported_p (fixed_size_mode mode,
> by_pieces_operation op)
> >> +{
> >> + if ((op == SET_BY_PIECES || op == CLEAR_BY_PIECES)
> >> + && optab_handler (vec_duplicate_optab, mode) !=
> CODE_FOR_nothing)
> >> + return true;
> >> +
> >> + if (op == COMPARE_BY_PIECES
> >> + && optab_handler (mov_optab, mode) != CODE_FOR_nothing
> >> + && can_compare_p (EQ, mode, ccp_jump))
> >> + return true;
> >>
> >> + return false;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/* Return the widest mode that can be used to perform part of an
> >> + operation OP on SIZE bytes. Try to use QI vector modes where
> >> + possible. */
> >> static fixed_size_mode
> >> -widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (unsigned int size, bool
> >> qi_vector)
> >> +widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (unsigned int size,
> >> +by_pieces_operation
> op)
> >> {
> >> fixed_size_mode result = NARROWEST_INT_MODE;
> >>
> >> gcc_checking_assert (size > 1);
> >>
> >> /* Use QI vector only if size is wider than a WORD. */
> >> - if (qi_vector && size > UNITS_PER_WORD)
> >> + if (can_use_qi_vectors (op) && size > UNITS_PER_WORD)
> >> {
> >> machine_mode mode;
> >> fixed_size_mode candidate;
> >> @@ -1009,8 +1035,7 @@ widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (unsigned int
> size, bool qi_vector)
> >> {
> >> if (GET_MODE_SIZE (candidate) >= size)
> >> break;
> >> - if (optab_handler (vec_duplicate_optab, candidate)
> >> - != CODE_FOR_nothing)
> >> + if (qi_vector_mode_supported_p (candidate, op))
> >> result = candidate;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -1019,9 +1044,14 @@ widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (unsigned
> int size, bool qi_vector)
> >> }
> >>
> >> opt_scalar_int_mode tmode;
> >> + scalar_int_mode mode;
> >> FOR_EACH_MODE_IN_CLASS (tmode, MODE_INT)
> >> - if (GET_MODE_SIZE (tmode.require ()) < size)
> >> - result = tmode.require ();
> >> + {
> >> + mode = tmode.require ();
> >> + if (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) < size
> >> + && targetm.scalar_mode_supported_p (mode))
> >> + result = mode;
> >> + }
> >>
> >> return result;
> >> }
> >> @@ -1061,8 +1091,7 @@ by_pieces_ninsns (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT l,
> unsigned int align,
> >> {
> >> /* NB: Round up L and ALIGN to the widest integer mode for
> >> MAX_SIZE. */
> >> - mode = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (max_size,
> >> - op == SET_BY_PIECES);
> >> + mode = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (max_size, op);
> >> if (optab_handler (mov_optab, mode) != CODE_FOR_nothing)
> >> {
> >> unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT up = ROUND_UP (l, GET_MODE_SIZE
> (mode));
> >> @@ -1076,8 +1105,7 @@ by_pieces_ninsns (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT l,
> unsigned int align,
> >>
> >> while (max_size > 1 && l > 0)
> >> {
> >> - mode = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (max_size,
> >> - op == SET_BY_PIECES);
> >> + mode = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (max_size, op);
> >> enum insn_code icode;
> >>
> >> unsigned int modesize = GET_MODE_SIZE (mode); @@ -1317,8
> >> +1345,8 @@ class op_by_pieces_d
> >> bool m_push;
> >> /* True if targetm.overlap_op_by_pieces_p () returns true. */
> >> bool m_overlap_op_by_pieces;
> >> - /* True if QI vector mode can be used. */
> >> - bool m_qi_vector_mode;
> >> + /* The type of operation that we're performing. */
> >> + by_pieces_operation m_op;
> >>
> >> /* Virtual functions, overriden by derived classes for the specific
> >> operation. */
> >> @@ -1331,7 +1359,7 @@ class op_by_pieces_d
> >> public:
> >> op_by_pieces_d (unsigned int, rtx, bool, rtx, bool, by_pieces_constfn,
> >> void *, unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT, unsigned int, bool,
> >> - bool = false);
> >> + by_pieces_operation);
> >> void run ();
> >> };
> >>
> >> @@ -1349,11 +1377,11 @@ op_by_pieces_d::op_by_pieces_d (unsigned
> int max_pieces, rtx to,
> >> void *from_cfn_data,
> >> unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT len,
> >> unsigned int align, bool push,
> >> - bool qi_vector_mode)
> >> + by_pieces_operation op)
> >> : m_to (to, to_load, NULL, NULL),
> >> m_from (from, from_load, from_cfn, from_cfn_data),
> >> m_len (len), m_max_size (max_pieces + 1),
> >> - m_push (push), m_qi_vector_mode (qi_vector_mode)
> >> + m_push (push), m_op (op)
> >> {
> >> int toi = m_to.get_addr_inc ();
> >> int fromi = m_from.get_addr_inc (); @@ -1375,8 +1403,7 @@
> >> op_by_pieces_d::op_by_pieces_d (unsigned int
> max_pieces, rtx to,
> >> {
> >> /* Find the mode of the largest comparison. */
> >> fixed_size_mode mode
> >> - = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (m_max_size,
> >> - m_qi_vector_mode);
> >> + = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (m_max_size, m_op);
> >>
> >> m_from.decide_autoinc (mode, m_reverse, len);
> >> m_to.decide_autoinc (mode, m_reverse, len); @@ -1401,7
> >> +1428,7 @@ op_by_pieces_d::get_usable_mode
> (fixed_size_mode mode, unsigned int len)
> >> if (len >= size && prepare_mode (mode, m_align))
> >> break;
> >> /* widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size checks SIZE > 1. */
> >> - mode = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (size, m_qi_vector_mode);
> >> + mode = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (size, m_op);
> >> }
> >> while (1);
> >> return mode;
> >> @@ -1414,7 +1441,7 @@ fixed_size_mode
> >> op_by_pieces_d::smallest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (unsigned int
> >> size) {
> >> /* Use QI vector only for > size of WORD. */
> >> - if (m_qi_vector_mode && size > UNITS_PER_WORD)
> >> + if (can_use_qi_vectors (m_op) && size > UNITS_PER_WORD)
> >> {
> >> machine_mode mode;
> >> fixed_size_mode candidate;
> >> @@ -1427,8 +1454,7 @@
> op_by_pieces_d::smallest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (unsigned int size)
> >> break;
> >>
> >> if (GET_MODE_SIZE (candidate) >= size
> >> - && (optab_handler (vec_duplicate_optab, candidate)
> >> - != CODE_FOR_nothing))
> >> + && qi_vector_mode_supported_p (candidate, m_op))
> >> return candidate;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> @@ -1451,7 +1477,7 @@ op_by_pieces_d::run ()
> >>
> >> /* widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size checks M_MAX_SIZE > 1. */
> >> fixed_size_mode mode
> >> - = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (m_max_size, m_qi_vector_mode);
> >> + = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (m_max_size, m_op);
> >> mode = get_usable_mode (mode, length);
> >>
> >> by_pieces_prev to_prev = { nullptr, mode }; @@ -1516,8 +1542,7
> >> @@ op_by_pieces_d::run ()
> >> else
> >> {
> >> /* widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size checks SIZE > 1. */
> >> - mode = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (size,
> >> - m_qi_vector_mode);
> >> + mode = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (size, m_op);
> >> mode = get_usable_mode (mode, length);
> >> }
> >> }
> >> @@ -1543,7 +1568,7 @@ class move_by_pieces_d : public
> op_by_pieces_d
> >> move_by_pieces_d (rtx to, rtx from, unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT len,
> >> unsigned int align)
> >> : op_by_pieces_d (MOVE_MAX_PIECES, to, false, from, true, NULL,
> >> - NULL, len, align, PUSHG_P (to))
> >> + NULL, len, align, PUSHG_P (to), MOVE_BY_PIECES)
> >> {
> >> }
> >> rtx finish_retmode (memop_ret);
> >> @@ -1632,15 +1657,16 @@ move_by_pieces (rtx to, rtx from, unsigned
> HOST_WIDE_INT len,
> >> class store_by_pieces_d : public op_by_pieces_d {
> >> insn_gen_fn m_gen_fun;
> >> +
> >> void generate (rtx, rtx, machine_mode) final override;
> >> bool prepare_mode (machine_mode, unsigned int) final override;
> >>
> >> public:
> >> store_by_pieces_d (rtx to, by_pieces_constfn cfn, void *cfn_data,
> >> unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT len, unsigned int align,
> >> - bool qi_vector_mode)
> >> + by_pieces_operation op)
> >> : op_by_pieces_d (STORE_MAX_PIECES, to, false, NULL_RTX, true, cfn,
> >> - cfn_data, len, align, false, qi_vector_mode)
> >> + cfn_data, len, align, false, op)
> >> {
> >> }
> >> rtx finish_retmode (memop_ret);
> >> @@ -1729,8 +1755,8 @@ can_store_by_pieces (unsigned
> HOST_WIDE_INT len,
> >> max_size = STORE_MAX_PIECES + 1;
> >> while (max_size > 1 && l > 0)
> >> {
> >> - fixed_size_mode mode
> >> - = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (max_size, memsetp);
> >> + auto op = memsetp ? SET_BY_PIECES : STORE_BY_PIECES;
> >> + auto mode = widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size (max_size, op);
> >>
> >> icode = optab_handler (mov_optab, mode);
> >> if (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing
> >> @@ -1793,7 +1819,7 @@ store_by_pieces (rtx to, unsigned
> HOST_WIDE_INT len,
> >> optimize_insn_for_speed_p ()));
> >>
> >> store_by_pieces_d data (to, constfun, constfundata, len, align,
> >> - memsetp);
> >> + memsetp ? SET_BY_PIECES : STORE_BY_PIECES);
> >> data.run ();
> >>
> >> if (retmode != RETURN_BEGIN)
> >> @@ -1814,7 +1840,7 @@ clear_by_pieces (rtx to, unsigned
> HOST_WIDE_INT len, unsigned int align)
> >> /* Use builtin_memset_read_str to support vector mode broadcast. */
> >> char c = 0;
> >> store_by_pieces_d data (to, builtin_memset_read_str, &c, len, align,
> >> - true);
> >> + CLEAR_BY_PIECES);
> >> data.run ();
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -1832,12 +1858,13 @@ class compare_by_pieces_d : public
> op_by_pieces_d
> >> void generate (rtx, rtx, machine_mode) final override;
> >> bool prepare_mode (machine_mode, unsigned int) final override;
> >> void finish_mode (machine_mode) final override;
> >> +
> >> public:
> >> compare_by_pieces_d (rtx op0, rtx op1, by_pieces_constfn op1_cfn,
> >> void *op1_cfn_data, HOST_WIDE_INT len, int align,
> >> rtx_code_label *fail_label)
> >> : op_by_pieces_d (COMPARE_MAX_PIECES, op0, true, op1, true,
> op1_cfn,
> >> - op1_cfn_data, len, align, false)
> >> + op1_cfn_data, len, align, false, COMPARE_BY_PIECES)
> >> {
> >> m_fail_label = fail_label;
> >> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-24 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-20 7:22 HAO CHEN GUI
2023-10-20 8:49 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-10-23 1:29 ` HAO CHEN GUI
2023-10-24 8:42 ` Jiang, Haochen
2023-10-24 8:49 ` Jiang, Haochen [this message]
2023-10-24 9:28 ` HAO CHEN GUI
2023-10-25 8:32 ` HAO CHEN GUI
2023-10-25 8:40 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-10-25 8:47 ` Jiang, Haochen
2023-10-26 8:57 ` Jiang, Haochen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SA1PR11MB5946D42F623A73D9923C3D3BECDFA@SA1PR11MB5946.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=haochen.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=guihaoc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).