public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinath Parvathaneni <srinath.parvathaneni@arm.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Subject: [GCC-10 backport][PATCH] arm: _Generic feature failing with ICE for -O0 (pr97205).
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:18:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0802MB2368DD4BD75B0CA78FE01C629B5E9@VI1PR0802MB2368.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4092 bytes --]

Hi,

This is a backport to GCC-10 to fix PR97205, patch applies
cleanly on the branch.

Regression tested and found no issues.

Ok for GCC-10 backport?

Regards,
Srinath.

    This makes sure that stack allocated SSA_NAMEs are
    at least MODE_ALIGNED.  Also increase the MEM_ALIGN
    for the corresponding rtl objects.

    gcc:
    2020-11-03  Bernd Edlinger  <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>

        PR target/97205
        * cfgexpand.c (align_local_variable): Make SSA_NAMEs
        at least MODE_ALIGNED.
        (expand_one_stack_var_at): Increase MEM_ALIGN for SSA_NAMEs.

    gcc/testsuite:
    2020-11-03  Bernd Edlinger  <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>

        PR target/97205
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr97205.c: New test.

    (cherry picked from commit 23ac7a009ecfeec3eab79136abed8aac9768b458)


###############     Attachment also inlined for ease of reply    ###############


diff --git a/gcc/cfgexpand.c b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
index bf4f194ed993134109cc21be9cb0ed8a5c170824..4fef5d6ebf420ce4d6f59606ecd064f45ae59065 100644
--- a/gcc/cfgexpand.c
+++ b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
@@ -366,7 +366,15 @@ align_local_variable (tree decl, bool really_expand)
   unsigned int align;
 
   if (TREE_CODE (decl) == SSA_NAME)
-    align = TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (decl));
+    {
+      tree type = TREE_TYPE (decl);
+      machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (type);
+
+      align = TYPE_ALIGN (type);
+      if (mode != BLKmode
+	  && align < GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode))
+	align = GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode);
+    }
   else
     {
       align = LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT (decl);
@@ -999,20 +1007,21 @@ expand_one_stack_var_at (tree decl, rtx base, unsigned base_align,
   x = plus_constant (Pmode, base, offset);
   x = gen_rtx_MEM (TREE_CODE (decl) == SSA_NAME
 		   ? TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (decl))
-		   : DECL_MODE (SSAVAR (decl)), x);
+		   : DECL_MODE (decl), x);
+
+  /* Set alignment we actually gave this decl if it isn't an SSA name.
+     If it is we generate stack slots only accidentally so it isn't as
+     important, we'll simply set the alignment directly on the MEM.  */
+
+  if (base == virtual_stack_vars_rtx)
+    offset -= frame_phase;
+  align = known_alignment (offset);
+  align *= BITS_PER_UNIT;
+  if (align == 0 || align > base_align)
+    align = base_align;
 
   if (TREE_CODE (decl) != SSA_NAME)
     {
-      /* Set alignment we actually gave this decl if it isn't an SSA name.
-         If it is we generate stack slots only accidentally so it isn't as
-	 important, we'll simply use the alignment that is already set.  */
-      if (base == virtual_stack_vars_rtx)
-	offset -= frame_phase;
-      align = known_alignment (offset);
-      align *= BITS_PER_UNIT;
-      if (align == 0 || align > base_align)
-	align = base_align;
-
       /* One would think that we could assert that we're not decreasing
 	 alignment here, but (at least) the i386 port does exactly this
 	 via the MINIMUM_ALIGNMENT hook.  */
@@ -1022,6 +1031,8 @@ expand_one_stack_var_at (tree decl, rtx base, unsigned base_align,
     }
 
   set_rtl (decl, x);
+
+  set_mem_align (x, align);
 }
 
 class stack_vars_data
@@ -1327,13 +1338,11 @@ expand_one_stack_var_1 (tree var)
     {
       tree type = TREE_TYPE (var);
       size = tree_to_poly_uint64 (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (type));
-      byte_align = TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT (type);
     }
   else
-    {
-      size = tree_to_poly_uint64 (DECL_SIZE_UNIT (var));
-      byte_align = align_local_variable (var, true);
-    }
+    size = tree_to_poly_uint64 (DECL_SIZE_UNIT (var));
+
+  byte_align = align_local_variable (var, true);
 
   /* We handle highly aligned variables in expand_stack_vars.  */
   gcc_assert (byte_align * BITS_PER_UNIT <= MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr97205.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr97205.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6600011fcf84660edcba8d968c78ee6aaa0aa923
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr97205.c
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+int a;
+typedef __attribute__((aligned(2))) int x;
+int f ()
+{
+  x b = a;
+  return b;
+}


[-- Attachment #2: rb14389.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3197 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/cfgexpand.c b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
index bf4f194ed993134109cc21be9cb0ed8a5c170824..4fef5d6ebf420ce4d6f59606ecd064f45ae59065 100644
--- a/gcc/cfgexpand.c
+++ b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
@@ -366,7 +366,15 @@ align_local_variable (tree decl, bool really_expand)
   unsigned int align;
 
   if (TREE_CODE (decl) == SSA_NAME)
-    align = TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (decl));
+    {
+      tree type = TREE_TYPE (decl);
+      machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (type);
+
+      align = TYPE_ALIGN (type);
+      if (mode != BLKmode
+	  && align < GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode))
+	align = GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode);
+    }
   else
     {
       align = LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT (decl);
@@ -999,20 +1007,21 @@ expand_one_stack_var_at (tree decl, rtx base, unsigned base_align,
   x = plus_constant (Pmode, base, offset);
   x = gen_rtx_MEM (TREE_CODE (decl) == SSA_NAME
 		   ? TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (decl))
-		   : DECL_MODE (SSAVAR (decl)), x);
+		   : DECL_MODE (decl), x);
+
+  /* Set alignment we actually gave this decl if it isn't an SSA name.
+     If it is we generate stack slots only accidentally so it isn't as
+     important, we'll simply set the alignment directly on the MEM.  */
+
+  if (base == virtual_stack_vars_rtx)
+    offset -= frame_phase;
+  align = known_alignment (offset);
+  align *= BITS_PER_UNIT;
+  if (align == 0 || align > base_align)
+    align = base_align;
 
   if (TREE_CODE (decl) != SSA_NAME)
     {
-      /* Set alignment we actually gave this decl if it isn't an SSA name.
-         If it is we generate stack slots only accidentally so it isn't as
-	 important, we'll simply use the alignment that is already set.  */
-      if (base == virtual_stack_vars_rtx)
-	offset -= frame_phase;
-      align = known_alignment (offset);
-      align *= BITS_PER_UNIT;
-      if (align == 0 || align > base_align)
-	align = base_align;
-
       /* One would think that we could assert that we're not decreasing
 	 alignment here, but (at least) the i386 port does exactly this
 	 via the MINIMUM_ALIGNMENT hook.  */
@@ -1022,6 +1031,8 @@ expand_one_stack_var_at (tree decl, rtx base, unsigned base_align,
     }
 
   set_rtl (decl, x);
+
+  set_mem_align (x, align);
 }
 
 class stack_vars_data
@@ -1327,13 +1338,11 @@ expand_one_stack_var_1 (tree var)
     {
       tree type = TREE_TYPE (var);
       size = tree_to_poly_uint64 (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (type));
-      byte_align = TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT (type);
     }
   else
-    {
-      size = tree_to_poly_uint64 (DECL_SIZE_UNIT (var));
-      byte_align = align_local_variable (var, true);
-    }
+    size = tree_to_poly_uint64 (DECL_SIZE_UNIT (var));
+
+  byte_align = align_local_variable (var, true);
 
   /* We handle highly aligned variables in expand_stack_vars.  */
   gcc_assert (byte_align * BITS_PER_UNIT <= MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr97205.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr97205.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6600011fcf84660edcba8d968c78ee6aaa0aa923
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr97205.c
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+int a;
+typedef __attribute__((aligned(2))) int x;
+int f ()
+{
+  x b = a;
+  return b;
+}


             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-30 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-30 15:18 Srinath Parvathaneni [this message]
2021-05-19 12:22 ` Srinath Parvathaneni
2021-05-19 14:44   ` Richard Earnshaw

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VI1PR0802MB2368DD4BD75B0CA78FE01C629B5E9@VI1PR0802MB2368.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=srinath.parvathaneni@arm.com \
    --cc=Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).