From: Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>
To: Richard Sandiford <Richard.Sandiford@arm.com>,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>,
Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH]AArch64 div-by-255, ensure that arguments are registers. [PR107988]
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:18:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR08MB532541D593A0984E3FF8AD41FFE09@VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mptbkod6oma.fsf@arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5918 bytes --]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 7:08 AM
> To: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
> Cc: Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> nd <nd@arm.com>; Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>;
> Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>; Kyrylo Tkachov
> <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH]AArch64 div-by-255, ensure that arguments are
> registers. [PR107988]
>
> Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com> writes:
> > On 08/12/2022 16:39, Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> At -O0 (as opposed to e.g. volatile) we can get into the situation
> >> where the
> >> in0 and result RTL arguments passed to the division function are
> >> memory locations instead of registers. I think we could reject these
> >> early on by checking that the gimple values are GIMPLE registers, but
> >> I think it's better to handle it.
> >>
> >> As such I force them to registers and emit a move to the memory
> >> locations and leave it up to reload to handle. This fixes the ICE
> >> and still allows the optimization in these cases, which improves the code
> quality a lot.
> >>
> >> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
> >>
> >> Ok for master?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Tamar
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> gcc/ChangeLog:
> >>
> >> PR target/107988
> >> * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> (aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant): Ensure input and
> output
> >> RTL are registers.
> >>
> >> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >>
> >> PR target/107988
> >> * gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c: New test.
> >>
> >> --- inline copy of patch --
> >> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc index
> >>
> b8dc3f070c8afc47c85fa18768c4da92c774338f..9f96424993c4fcccce90e1b241f
> >> cb3aa97025225 100644
> >> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> @@ -24337,12 +24337,27 @@
> aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant (enum tree_code code,
> >> if (!VECTOR_TYPE_P (vectype))
> >> return false;
> >>
> >> + if (!REG_P (in0))
> >> + in0 = force_reg (GET_MODE (in0), in0);
> >> +
> >> gcc_assert (output);
> >>
> >> - if (!*output)
> >> - *output = gen_reg_rtx (TYPE_MODE (vectype));
> >> + rtx res = NULL_RTX;
> >> +
> >> + /* Once e get to this point we cannot reject the RTL, if it's not a reg
> then
> >> + Create a new reg and write the result to the output afterwards.
> >> + */ if (!*output || !REG_P (*output))
> >> + res = gen_reg_rtx (TYPE_MODE (vectype)); else
> >> + res = *output;
> >
> > Why not write
> > rtx res = *output
> > if (!res || !REG_P (res))
> > res = gen_reg_rtx...
> >
> > then you don't need either the else clause or the dead NULL_RTX
> assignment.
>
> I'd prefer that we use the expand_insn interface, which already has logic for
> coercing inputs and outputs to predicates. Something like:
>
> machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (vectype);
> unsigned int flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (mode);
> if ((flags & VEC_ANY_SVE) && !TARGET_SVE2)
> return false;
>
> ...
>
> expand_operand ops[3];
> create_output_operand (&ops[0], *output, mode);
> create_input_operand (&ops[1], in0, mode);
> create_fixed_operand (&ops[2], in1);
> expand_insn (insn_code, 3, ops);
> *output = ops[0].value;
> return true;
>
> On this function: why do we have the VECTOR_TYPE_P condition in:
>
It was left over after checking for optabs support. It's superfluous now.
Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
Ok for master?
Thanks,
Tamar
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/107988
* config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
(aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant): Ensure input and output
RTL are registers.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/107988
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c: New test.
--- inline copy of patch ---
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index 7bb0b7602ff6474410059494dd86b7be1621dde5..e1f34ef5da170ef11727e0c99a5bd42849c5d185 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -24395,7 +24395,8 @@ aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant (enum tree_code code,
|| !TYPE_UNSIGNED (vectype))
return false;
- unsigned int flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (TYPE_MODE (vectype));
+ machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (vectype);
+ unsigned int flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (mode);
if ((flags & VEC_ANY_SVE) && !TARGET_SVE2)
return false;
@@ -24411,15 +24412,14 @@ aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant (enum tree_code code,
if (in0 == NULL_RTX && in1 == NULL_RTX)
return true;
- if (!VECTOR_TYPE_P (vectype))
- return false;
-
gcc_assert (output);
- if (!*output)
- *output = gen_reg_rtx (TYPE_MODE (vectype));
-
- emit_insn (gen_aarch64_bitmask_udiv3 (TYPE_MODE (vectype), *output, in0, in1));
+ expand_operand ops[3];
+ create_output_operand (&ops[0], *output, mode);
+ create_input_operand (&ops[1], in0, mode);
+ create_fixed_operand (&ops[2], in1);
+ expand_insn (insn_code, 3, ops);
+ *output = ops[0].value;
return true;
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c4fd290271b738345173b569bdc58c092fba7fe9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-O0" } */
+typedef unsigned short __attribute__((__vector_size__ (16))) V;
+
+V
+foo (V v)
+{
+ v /= 255;
+ return v;
+}
[-- Attachment #2: rb16679.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1752 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index 7bb0b7602ff6474410059494dd86b7be1621dde5..e1f34ef5da170ef11727e0c99a5bd42849c5d185 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -24395,7 +24395,8 @@ aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant (enum tree_code code,
|| !TYPE_UNSIGNED (vectype))
return false;
- unsigned int flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (TYPE_MODE (vectype));
+ machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (vectype);
+ unsigned int flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (mode);
if ((flags & VEC_ANY_SVE) && !TARGET_SVE2)
return false;
@@ -24411,15 +24412,14 @@ aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant (enum tree_code code,
if (in0 == NULL_RTX && in1 == NULL_RTX)
return true;
- if (!VECTOR_TYPE_P (vectype))
- return false;
-
gcc_assert (output);
- if (!*output)
- *output = gen_reg_rtx (TYPE_MODE (vectype));
-
- emit_insn (gen_aarch64_bitmask_udiv3 (TYPE_MODE (vectype), *output, in0, in1));
+ expand_operand ops[3];
+ create_output_operand (&ops[0], *output, mode);
+ create_input_operand (&ops[1], in0, mode);
+ create_fixed_operand (&ops[2], in1);
+ expand_insn (insn_code, 3, ops);
+ *output = ops[0].value;
return true;
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c4fd290271b738345173b569bdc58c092fba7fe9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-O0" } */
+typedef unsigned short __attribute__((__vector_size__ (16))) V;
+
+V
+foo (V v)
+{
+ v /= 255;
+ return v;
+}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-14 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-08 16:39 Tamar Christina
2022-12-08 17:00 ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-12-09 7:08 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-12-14 11:18 ` Tamar Christina [this message]
2022-12-14 13:50 ` Richard Sandiford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VI1PR08MB532541D593A0984E3FF8AD41FFE09@VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=tamar.christina@arm.com \
--cc=Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com \
--cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).