public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>
To: Richard Sandiford <Richard.Sandiford@arm.com>,
	Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
	Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>,
	Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH]AArch64 div-by-255, ensure that arguments are registers. [PR107988]
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:18:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR08MB532541D593A0984E3FF8AD41FFE09@VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mptbkod6oma.fsf@arm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5918 bytes --]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 9, 2022 7:08 AM
> To: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
> Cc: Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> nd <nd@arm.com>; Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>;
> Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>; Kyrylo Tkachov
> <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH]AArch64 div-by-255, ensure that arguments are
> registers. [PR107988]
> 
> Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com> writes:
> > On 08/12/2022 16:39, Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> At -O0 (as opposed to e.g. volatile) we can get into the situation
> >> where the
> >> in0 and result RTL arguments passed to the division function are
> >> memory locations instead of registers.  I think we could reject these
> >> early on by checking that the gimple values are GIMPLE registers, but
> >> I think it's better to handle it.
> >>
> >> As such I force them to registers and emit a move to the memory
> >> locations and leave it up to reload to handle.  This fixes the ICE
> >> and still allows the optimization in these cases,  which improves the code
> quality a lot.
> >>
> >> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
> >>
> >> Ok for master?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Tamar
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> gcc/ChangeLog:
> >>
> >> 	PR target/107988
> >> 	* config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> 	(aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant): Ensure input and
> output
> >> 	RTL are registers.
> >>
> >> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >>
> >> 	PR target/107988
> >> 	* gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c: New test.
> >>
> >> --- inline copy of patch --
> >> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc index
> >>
> b8dc3f070c8afc47c85fa18768c4da92c774338f..9f96424993c4fcccce90e1b241f
> >> cb3aa97025225 100644
> >> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> >> @@ -24337,12 +24337,27 @@
> aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant (enum tree_code code,
> >>     if (!VECTOR_TYPE_P (vectype))
> >>      return false;
> >>
> >> +  if (!REG_P (in0))
> >> +    in0 = force_reg (GET_MODE (in0), in0);
> >> +
> >>     gcc_assert (output);
> >>
> >> -  if (!*output)
> >> -    *output = gen_reg_rtx (TYPE_MODE (vectype));
> >> +  rtx res =  NULL_RTX;
> >> +
> >> +  /* Once e get to this point we cannot reject the RTL,  if it's not a reg
> then
> >> +     Create a new reg and write the result to the output afterwards.
> >> + */  if (!*output || !REG_P (*output))
> >> +    res = gen_reg_rtx (TYPE_MODE (vectype));  else
> >> +    res = *output;
> >
> > Why not write
> >    rtx res = *output
> >    if (!res || !REG_P (res))
> >      res = gen_reg_rtx...
> >
> > then you don't need either the else clause or the dead NULL_RTX
> assignment.
> 
> I'd prefer that we use the expand_insn interface, which already has logic for
> coercing inputs and outputs to predicates.  Something like:
> 
>   machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (vectype);
>   unsigned int flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (mode);
>   if ((flags & VEC_ANY_SVE) && !TARGET_SVE2)
>     return false;
> 
>   ...
> 
>   expand_operand ops[3];
>   create_output_operand (&ops[0], *output, mode);
>   create_input_operand (&ops[1], in0, mode);
>   create_fixed_operand (&ops[2], in1);
>   expand_insn (insn_code, 3, ops);
>   *output = ops[0].value;
>   return true;
> 
> On this function: why do we have the VECTOR_TYPE_P condition in:
> 

It was left over after checking for optabs support. It's superfluous now.

Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.

Ok for master?

Thanks,
Tamar

gcc/ChangeLog:

	PR target/107988
	* config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
	(aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant): Ensure input and output
	RTL are registers.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR target/107988
	* gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c: New test.

--- inline copy of patch ---

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index 7bb0b7602ff6474410059494dd86b7be1621dde5..e1f34ef5da170ef11727e0c99a5bd42849c5d185 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -24395,7 +24395,8 @@ aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant (enum tree_code code,
       || !TYPE_UNSIGNED (vectype))
     return false;
 
-  unsigned int flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (TYPE_MODE (vectype));
+  machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (vectype);
+  unsigned int flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (mode);
   if ((flags & VEC_ANY_SVE) && !TARGET_SVE2)
     return false;
 
@@ -24411,15 +24412,14 @@ aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant (enum tree_code code,
   if (in0 == NULL_RTX && in1 == NULL_RTX)
     return true;
 
-  if (!VECTOR_TYPE_P (vectype))
-   return false;
-
   gcc_assert (output);
 
-  if (!*output)
-    *output = gen_reg_rtx (TYPE_MODE (vectype));
-
-  emit_insn (gen_aarch64_bitmask_udiv3 (TYPE_MODE (vectype), *output, in0, in1));
+  expand_operand ops[3];
+  create_output_operand (&ops[0], *output, mode);
+  create_input_operand (&ops[1], in0, mode);
+  create_fixed_operand (&ops[2], in1);
+  expand_insn (insn_code, 3, ops);
+  *output = ops[0].value;
   return true;
 }
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c4fd290271b738345173b569bdc58c092fba7fe9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-O0" } */
+typedef unsigned short __attribute__((__vector_size__ (16))) V;
+
+V
+foo (V v)
+{
+  v /= 255;
+  return v;
+}

[-- Attachment #2: rb16679.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1752 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index 7bb0b7602ff6474410059494dd86b7be1621dde5..e1f34ef5da170ef11727e0c99a5bd42849c5d185 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -24395,7 +24395,8 @@ aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant (enum tree_code code,
       || !TYPE_UNSIGNED (vectype))
     return false;
 
-  unsigned int flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (TYPE_MODE (vectype));
+  machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (vectype);
+  unsigned int flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (mode);
   if ((flags & VEC_ANY_SVE) && !TARGET_SVE2)
     return false;
 
@@ -24411,15 +24412,14 @@ aarch64_vectorize_can_special_div_by_constant (enum tree_code code,
   if (in0 == NULL_RTX && in1 == NULL_RTX)
     return true;
 
-  if (!VECTOR_TYPE_P (vectype))
-   return false;
-
   gcc_assert (output);
 
-  if (!*output)
-    *output = gen_reg_rtx (TYPE_MODE (vectype));
-
-  emit_insn (gen_aarch64_bitmask_udiv3 (TYPE_MODE (vectype), *output, in0, in1));
+  expand_operand ops[3];
+  create_output_operand (&ops[0], *output, mode);
+  create_input_operand (&ops[1], in0, mode);
+  create_fixed_operand (&ops[2], in1);
+  expand_insn (insn_code, 3, ops);
+  *output = ops[0].value;
   return true;
 }
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c4fd290271b738345173b569bdc58c092fba7fe9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr107988-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-O0" } */
+typedef unsigned short __attribute__((__vector_size__ (16))) V;
+
+V
+foo (V v)
+{
+  v /= 255;
+  return v;
+}

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-14 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-08 16:39 Tamar Christina
2022-12-08 17:00 ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-12-09  7:08   ` Richard Sandiford
2022-12-14 11:18     ` Tamar Christina [this message]
2022-12-14 13:50       ` Richard Sandiford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VI1PR08MB532541D593A0984E3FF8AD41FFE09@VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=tamar.christina@arm.com \
    --cc=Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com \
    --cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).