Hi Richi, Attached is re-spun patch. tree_nop_conversion_p was very handy in cleaning up the patch, Thanks! Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues. Ok for master if Richard S has no comments? Thanks, Tamar gcc/ChangeLog: * optabs.def (usdot_prod_optab): New. * doc/md.texi: Document it and clarify other dot prod optabs. * optabs-tree.h (enum optab_subtype): Add optab_vector_mixed_sign. * optabs-tree.c (optab_for_tree_code): Support usdot_prod_optab. * optabs.c (expand_widen_pattern_expr): Likewise. * tree-cfg.c (verify_gimple_assign_ternary): Likewise. * tree-vect-loop.c (vectorizable_reduction): Query dot-product kind. * tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_supportable_direct_optab_p): Take optional optab subtype. (vect_joust_widened_type, vect_widened_op_tree): Optionally ignore mismatch types. (vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern): Support usdot_prod_optab. --- inline copy of patch --- diff --git a/gcc/doc/md.texi b/gcc/doc/md.texi index d166a0debedf4d8edf55c842bcf4ff4690b3e9ce..9fad3322b3f1eb2a836833bb390df78f0cd9734b 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/md.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/md.texi @@ -5438,13 +5438,55 @@ Like @samp{fold_left_plus_@var{m}}, but takes an additional mask operand @cindex @code{sdot_prod@var{m}} instruction pattern @item @samp{sdot_prod@var{m}} + +Compute the sum of the products of two signed elements. +Operand 1 and operand 2 are of the same mode. Their +product, which is of a wider mode, is computed and added to operand 3. +Operand 3 is of a mode equal or wider than the mode of the product. The +result is placed in operand 0, which is of the same mode as operand 3. + +Semantically the expressions perform the multiplication in the following signs + +@smallexample +sdot == + res = sign-ext (a) * sign-ext (b) + c +@dots{} +@end smallexample + @cindex @code{udot_prod@var{m}} instruction pattern -@itemx @samp{udot_prod@var{m}} -Compute the sum of the products of two signed/unsigned elements. -Operand 1 and operand 2 are of the same mode. Their product, which is of a -wider mode, is computed and added to operand 3. Operand 3 is of a mode equal or -wider than the mode of the product. The result is placed in operand 0, which -is of the same mode as operand 3. +@item @samp{udot_prod@var{m}} + +Compute the sum of the products of two unsigned elements. +Operand 1 and operand 2 are of the same mode. Their +product, which is of a wider mode, is computed and added to operand 3. +Operand 3 is of a mode equal or wider than the mode of the product. The +result is placed in operand 0, which is of the same mode as operand 3. + +Semantically the expressions perform the multiplication in the following signs + +@smallexample +udot == + res = zero-ext (a) * zero-ext (b) + c +@dots{} +@end smallexample + + + +@cindex @code{usdot_prod@var{m}} instruction pattern +@item @samp{usdot_prod@var{m}} +Compute the sum of the products of elements of different signs. +Operand 1 must be unsigned and operand 2 signed. Their +product, which is of a wider mode, is computed and added to operand 3. +Operand 3 is of a mode equal or wider than the mode of the product. The +result is placed in operand 0, which is of the same mode as operand 3. + +Semantically the expressions perform the multiplication in the following signs + +@smallexample +usdot == + res = ((unsigned-conv) sign-ext (a)) * zero-ext (b) + c +@dots{} +@end smallexample @cindex @code{ssad@var{m}} instruction pattern @item @samp{ssad@var{m}} diff --git a/gcc/optabs-tree.h b/gcc/optabs-tree.h index c3aaa1a416991e856d3e24da45968a92ebada82c..fbd2b06b8dbfd560dfb66b314830e6b564b37abb 100644 --- a/gcc/optabs-tree.h +++ b/gcc/optabs-tree.h @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ enum optab_subtype { optab_default, optab_scalar, - optab_vector + optab_vector, + optab_vector_mixed_sign }; /* Return the optab used for computing the given operation on the type given by diff --git a/gcc/optabs-tree.c b/gcc/optabs-tree.c index 95ffe397c23e80c105afea52e9d47216bf52f55a..eeb5aeed3202cc6971b6447994bc5311e9c010bb 100644 --- a/gcc/optabs-tree.c +++ b/gcc/optabs-tree.c @@ -127,7 +127,12 @@ optab_for_tree_code (enum tree_code code, const_tree type, return TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) ? usum_widen_optab : ssum_widen_optab; case DOT_PROD_EXPR: - return TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) ? udot_prod_optab : sdot_prod_optab; + { + if (subtype == optab_vector_mixed_sign) + return usdot_prod_optab; + + return (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) ? udot_prod_optab : sdot_prod_optab); + } case SAD_EXPR: return TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) ? usad_optab : ssad_optab; diff --git a/gcc/optabs.c b/gcc/optabs.c index f4614a394587787293dc8b680a38901f7906f61c..d9b64441d0e0726afee89dc9c937350451e7670d 100644 --- a/gcc/optabs.c +++ b/gcc/optabs.c @@ -262,6 +262,11 @@ expand_widen_pattern_expr (sepops ops, rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx wide_op, bool sbool = false; oprnd0 = ops->op0; + if (nops >= 2) + oprnd1 = ops->op1; + if (nops >= 3) + oprnd2 = ops->op2; + tmode0 = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (oprnd0)); if (ops->code == VEC_UNPACK_FIX_TRUNC_HI_EXPR || ops->code == VEC_UNPACK_FIX_TRUNC_LO_EXPR) @@ -285,6 +290,27 @@ expand_widen_pattern_expr (sepops ops, rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx wide_op, ? vec_unpacks_sbool_hi_optab : vec_unpacks_sbool_lo_optab); sbool = true; } + else if (ops->code == DOT_PROD_EXPR) + { + enum optab_subtype subtype = optab_default; + signop sign1 = TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE (oprnd0)); + signop sign2 = TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE (oprnd1)); + if (sign1 == sign2) + ; + else if (sign1 == SIGNED && sign2 == UNSIGNED) + { + subtype = optab_vector_mixed_sign; + /* Same as optab_vector_mixed_sign but flip the operands. */ + std::swap (op0, op1); + } + else if (sign1 == UNSIGNED && sign2 == SIGNED) + subtype = optab_vector_mixed_sign; + else + gcc_unreachable (); + + widen_pattern_optab + = optab_for_tree_code (ops->code, TREE_TYPE (oprnd0), subtype); + } else widen_pattern_optab = optab_for_tree_code (ops->code, TREE_TYPE (oprnd0), optab_default); @@ -298,10 +324,7 @@ expand_widen_pattern_expr (sepops ops, rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx wide_op, gcc_assert (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing); if (nops >= 2) - { - oprnd1 = ops->op1; - tmode1 = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (oprnd1)); - } + tmode1 = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (oprnd1)); else if (sbool) { nops = 2; @@ -316,7 +339,6 @@ expand_widen_pattern_expr (sepops ops, rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx wide_op, { gcc_assert (tmode1 == tmode0); gcc_assert (op1); - oprnd2 = ops->op2; wmode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (oprnd2)); } diff --git a/gcc/optabs.def b/gcc/optabs.def index b192a9d070b8aa72e5676b2eaa020b5bdd7ffcc8..f470c2168378cec840edf7fbdb7c18615baae928 100644 --- a/gcc/optabs.def +++ b/gcc/optabs.def @@ -352,6 +352,7 @@ OPTAB_D (uavg_ceil_optab, "uavg$a3_ceil") OPTAB_D (sdot_prod_optab, "sdot_prod$I$a") OPTAB_D (ssum_widen_optab, "widen_ssum$I$a3") OPTAB_D (udot_prod_optab, "udot_prod$I$a") +OPTAB_D (usdot_prod_optab, "usdot_prod$I$a") OPTAB_D (usum_widen_optab, "widen_usum$I$a3") OPTAB_D (usad_optab, "usad$I$a") OPTAB_D (ssad_optab, "ssad$I$a") diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfg.c b/gcc/tree-cfg.c index 7e3aae5f9c28a49feedc7cc66e8ac0d476b9f28a..0128891852fcd74fe31cd338614e90a26256b4bd 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-cfg.c +++ b/gcc/tree-cfg.c @@ -4421,7 +4421,8 @@ verify_gimple_assign_ternary (gassign *stmt) && !SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (rhs1_type)) || (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (lhs_type) && !SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (lhs_type)))) - || !types_compatible_p (rhs1_type, rhs2_type) + /* rhs1_type and rhs2_type may differ in sign. */ + || !tree_nop_conversion_p (rhs1_type, rhs2_type) || !useless_type_conversion_p (lhs_type, rhs3_type) || maybe_lt (GET_MODE_SIZE (element_mode (rhs3_type)), 2 * GET_MODE_SIZE (element_mode (rhs1_type)))) diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c index 93fa2928e001c154bd4a9a73ac1dbbbf73c456df..756d2867b678d0d8394202c6adb03d9cd26029e7 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c @@ -6662,6 +6662,12 @@ vectorizable_reduction (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo, bool lane_reduc_code_p = (code == DOT_PROD_EXPR || code == WIDEN_SUM_EXPR || code == SAD_EXPR); int op_type = TREE_CODE_LENGTH (code); + enum optab_subtype optab_query_kind = optab_vector; + if (code == DOT_PROD_EXPR + && TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt))) + != TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_rhs2 (stmt)))) + optab_query_kind = optab_vector_mixed_sign; + scalar_dest = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt); scalar_type = TREE_TYPE (scalar_dest); @@ -7189,7 +7195,7 @@ vectorizable_reduction (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo, bool ok = true; /* 4.1. check support for the operation in the loop */ - optab optab = optab_for_tree_code (code, vectype_in, optab_vector); + optab optab = optab_for_tree_code (code, vectype_in, optab_query_kind); if (!optab) { if (dump_enabled_p ()) diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c index 441d6cd28c4eaded7abd756164890dbcffd2f3b8..82123b96313e6783ea214b9259805d65c07d8858 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c @@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ vect_get_external_def_edge (vec_info *vinfo, tree var) static bool vect_supportable_direct_optab_p (vec_info *vinfo, tree otype, tree_code code, tree itype, tree *vecotype_out, - tree *vecitype_out = NULL) + tree *vecitype_out = NULL, + enum optab_subtype subtype = optab_default) { tree vecitype = get_vectype_for_scalar_type (vinfo, itype); if (!vecitype) @@ -211,7 +212,7 @@ vect_supportable_direct_optab_p (vec_info *vinfo, tree otype, tree_code code, if (!vecotype) return false; - optab optab = optab_for_tree_code (code, vecitype, optab_default); + optab optab = optab_for_tree_code (code, vecitype, subtype); if (!optab) return false; @@ -487,10 +488,14 @@ vect_joust_widened_integer (tree type, bool shift_p, tree op, } /* Return true if the common supertype of NEW_TYPE and *COMMON_TYPE - is narrower than type, storing the supertype in *COMMON_TYPE if so. */ + is narrower than type, storing the supertype in *COMMON_TYPE if so. + If UNPROM_TYPE then accept that *COMMON_TYPE and NEW_TYPE may be of + different signs but equal precision and that the resulting + multiplication of them be compatible with UNPROM_TYPE. */ static bool -vect_joust_widened_type (tree type, tree new_type, tree *common_type) +vect_joust_widened_type (tree type, tree new_type, tree *common_type, + tree unprom_type = NULL) { if (types_compatible_p (*common_type, new_type)) return true; @@ -514,7 +519,18 @@ vect_joust_widened_type (tree type, tree new_type, tree *common_type) unsigned int precision = MAX (TYPE_PRECISION (*common_type), TYPE_PRECISION (new_type)); precision *= 2; - if (precision * 2 > TYPE_PRECISION (type)) + + /* Check if the mismatch is only in the sign and if we have + UNPROM_TYPE then allow it if there is enough precision to + not lose any information during the conversion. */ + if (unprom_type + && TYPE_SIGN (unprom_type) == SIGNED + && tree_nop_conversion_p (*common_type, new_type)) + return true; + + /* The resulting application is unsigned, check if we have enough + precision to perform the operation. */ + if (precision * 2 > TYPE_PRECISION (unprom_type ? unprom_type : type)) return false; *common_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (precision, false); @@ -532,6 +548,10 @@ vect_joust_widened_type (tree type, tree new_type, tree *common_type) to a type that (a) is narrower than the result of STMT_INFO and (b) can hold all leaf operand values. + If UNPROM_TYPE then allow that the signs of the operands + may differ in signs but not in precision and that the resulting type + of the operation on the operands is compatible with UNPROM_TYPE. + Return 0 if STMT_INFO isn't such a tree, or if no such COMMON_TYPE exists. */ @@ -539,7 +559,8 @@ static unsigned int vect_widened_op_tree (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info, tree_code code, tree_code widened_code, bool shift_p, unsigned int max_nops, - vect_unpromoted_value *unprom, tree *common_type) + vect_unpromoted_value *unprom, tree *common_type, + tree unprom_type = NULL) { /* Check for an integer operation with the right code. */ gassign *assign = dyn_cast (stmt_info->stmt); @@ -600,7 +621,8 @@ vect_widened_op_tree (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info, tree_code code, = vinfo->lookup_def (this_unprom->op); nops = vect_widened_op_tree (vinfo, def_stmt_info, code, widened_code, shift_p, max_nops, - this_unprom, common_type); + this_unprom, common_type, + unprom_type); if (nops == 0) return 0; @@ -617,7 +639,7 @@ vect_widened_op_tree (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info, tree_code code, if (i == 0) *common_type = this_unprom->type; else if (!vect_joust_widened_type (type, this_unprom->type, - common_type)) + common_type, unprom_type)) return 0; } } @@ -799,12 +821,15 @@ vect_convert_input (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info, tree type, } /* Invoke vect_convert_input for N elements of UNPROM and store the - result in the corresponding elements of RESULT. */ + result in the corresponding elements of RESULT. + + If ALLOW_SHORT_SIGN_MISMATCH then don't convert the types if they only + differ by sign. */ static void vect_convert_inputs (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info, unsigned int n, tree *result, tree type, vect_unpromoted_value *unprom, - tree vectype) + tree vectype, bool allow_short_sign_mismatch = false) { for (unsigned int i = 0; i < n; ++i) { @@ -812,8 +837,12 @@ vect_convert_inputs (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info, unsigned int n, for (j = 0; j < i; ++j) if (unprom[j].op == unprom[i].op) break; + if (j < i) result[i] = result[j]; + else if (allow_short_sign_mismatch + && tree_nop_conversion_p (type, unprom[i].type)) + result[i] = unprom[i].op; else result[i] = vect_convert_input (vinfo, stmt_info, type, &unprom[i], vectype); @@ -888,21 +917,24 @@ vect_reassociating_reduction_p (vec_info *vinfo, Try to find the following pattern: - type x_t, y_t; + type1a x_t + type1b y_t; TYPE1 prod; TYPE2 sum = init; loop: sum_0 = phi S1 x_t = ... S2 y_t = ... - S3 x_T = (TYPE1) x_t; - S4 y_T = (TYPE1) y_t; + S3 x_T = (TYPE3) x_t; + S4 y_T = (TYPE4) y_t; S5 prod = x_T * y_T; [S6 prod = (TYPE2) prod; #optional] S7 sum_1 = prod + sum_0; - where 'TYPE1' is exactly double the size of type 'type', and 'TYPE2' is the - same size of 'TYPE1' or bigger. This is a special case of a reduction + where 'TYPE1' is exactly double the size of type 'type1a' and 'type1b', + the sign of 'TYPE1' must be one of 'type1a' or 'type1b' but the sign of + 'type1a' and 'type1b' can differ. 'TYPE2' is the same size of 'TYPE1' or + bigger and must be the same sign. This is a special case of a reduction computation. Input: @@ -939,15 +971,16 @@ vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern (vec_info *vinfo, /* Look for the following pattern DX = (TYPE1) X; - DY = (TYPE1) Y; + DY = (TYPE2) Y; DPROD = DX * DY; - DDPROD = (TYPE2) DPROD; + DDPROD = (TYPE3) DPROD; sum_1 = DDPROD + sum_0; In which - DX is double the size of X - DY is double the size of Y - DX, DY, DPROD all have the same type but the sign - between DX, DY and DPROD can differ. + between DX, DY and DPROD can differ. The sign of DPROD + is one of the signs of DX or DY. - sum is the same size of DPROD or bigger - sum has been recognized as a reduction variable. @@ -986,20 +1019,29 @@ vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern (vec_info *vinfo, inside the loop (in case we are analyzing an outer-loop). */ vect_unpromoted_value unprom0[2]; if (!vect_widened_op_tree (vinfo, mult_vinfo, MULT_EXPR, WIDEN_MULT_EXPR, - false, 2, unprom0, &half_type)) + false, 2, unprom0, &half_type, + TREE_TYPE (unprom_mult.op))) return NULL; + /* Check to see if there is a sign change happening in the operands of the + multiplication and pick the appropriate optab subtype. */ + enum optab_subtype subtype; + if (TYPE_SIGN (unprom0[0].type) == TYPE_SIGN (unprom0[1].type)) + subtype = optab_default; + else + subtype = optab_vector_mixed_sign; + vect_pattern_detected ("vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern", last_stmt); tree half_vectype; if (!vect_supportable_direct_optab_p (vinfo, type, DOT_PROD_EXPR, half_type, - type_out, &half_vectype)) + type_out, &half_vectype, subtype)) return NULL; /* Get the inputs in the appropriate types. */ tree mult_oprnd[2]; vect_convert_inputs (vinfo, stmt_vinfo, 2, mult_oprnd, half_type, - unprom0, half_vectype); + unprom0, half_vectype, true); var = vect_recog_temp_ssa_var (type, NULL); pattern_stmt = gimple_build_assign (var, DOT_PROD_EXPR, > -----Original Message----- > From: Gcc-patches bounces+tamar.christina=arm.com@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of Tamar > Christina via Gcc-patches > Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 10:28 AM > To: Richard Biener > Cc: Richard Sandiford ; nd ; > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4]middle-end Vect: Add support for dot-product > where the sign for the multiplicant changes. > > Ping, > > Did you have any comments Richard S? > > Otherwise I'll proceed with respining according to Richi's comments. > > Regards, > Tamar > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Richard Biener > > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 9:57 AM > > To: Tamar Christina > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; Richard Sandiford > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4]middle-end Vect: Add support for dot-product > > where the sign for the multiplicant changes. > > > > On Tue, 25 May 2021, Tamar Christina wrote: > > > > > Hi Richi, > > > > > > Here's a respun version of the patch. > > > > > > Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues. > > > > > > Ok for master? > > > > index > > > 7e3aae5f9c28a49feedc7cc66e8ac0d476b9f28a..13e405edd765dde704c64348d > > 2d0b3cd88f0af7c > > 100644 > > --- a/gcc/tree-cfg.c > > +++ b/gcc/tree-cfg.c > > @@ -4421,7 +4421,9 @@ verify_gimple_assign_ternary (gassign *stmt) > > && !SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (rhs1_type)) > > || (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (lhs_type) > > && !SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (lhs_type)))) > > - || !types_compatible_p (rhs1_type, rhs2_type) > > + || (!types_compatible_p (rhs1_type, rhs2_type) > > + && TYPE_SIGN (rhs1_type) == TYPE_SIGN (rhs2_type) > > + && TYPE_PRECISION (rhs1_type) != TYPE_PRECISION > > (rhs2_type)) > > > > I think this doesn't capture the constraints - instead please do > > > > - || !types_compatible_p (rhs1_type, rhs2_type) > > + /* rhs1_type and rhs2_type may differ in sign. */ > > + || !tree_nop_conversion_p (rhs1_type, rhs2_type) > > > > > > +/* Determine the optab_subtype to use for the given CODE and STMT. > For > > + most CODE this will be optab_vector, however for certain > > +operations > > such as > > + DOT_PROD_EXPR where the operation can different signs for the > > operands > > we > > + need to be able to pick the right optabs. */ > > + > > +static enum optab_subtype > > +vect_determine_dot_kind (tree_code code, stmt_vec_info stmt_vinfo) > > > > vect_determine_optab_subkind would be a better name. 'code' is > > redundant (or should better match stmt_vinfo->stmts code). I wonder > > if it might be clearer to compute the subtype where we compute 'code' > > and the relation to stmt_info is obvious, I mean here: > > > > /* 3. Check the operands of the operation. The first operands are > > defined > > inside the loop body. The last operand is the reduction variable, > > which is defined by the loop-header-phi. */ > > > > tree vectype_out = STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (stmt_info); > > STMT_VINFO_REDUC_VECTYPE (reduc_info) = vectype_out; > > gassign *stmt = as_a (stmt_info->stmt); > > enum tree_code code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt); > > bool lane_reduc_code_p > > = (code == DOT_PROD_EXPR || code == WIDEN_SUM_EXPR || code == > > SAD_EXPR); > > > > so just add > > > > enum optab_subtype optab_query_kind = optab_vector; > > if (code == DOT_PROD_EXPR > > && ) > > optab_query_kind = optab_vector_mixed_sign; > > > > in this place and avoid adding the new function? > > > > I'm not too familiar with the pattern recog code, a 2nd eye would be > > prefered (Richard?), but > > > > + /* Check if the mismatch is only in the sign and if we have > > + allow_short_sign_mismatch then allow it. */ if (unprom_type > > + && TYPE_SIGN (unprom_type) == SIGNED > > + && TYPE_SIGN (*common_type) != TYPE_SIGN (new_type)) > > + { > > + bool sign = TYPE_SIGN (*common_type) == UNSIGNED; > > + tree eq_type > > + = build_nonstandard_integer_type (TYPE_PRECISION (new_type), > > + sign); > > + > > + if (types_compatible_p (*common_type, eq_type)) > > + return true; > > + } > > > > looks somewhat complicated - is that equal to > > > > if (unprom_type > > && tree_nop_conversion_p (*common_type, new_type)) > > return true; > > > > ? That is, *common_type and new_type only differ in sign? > > > > @@ -812,8 +844,13 @@ vect_convert_inputs (vec_info *vinfo, > > stmt_vec_info stmt_info, unsigned int n, > > for (j = 0; j < i; ++j) > > if (unprom[j].op == unprom[i].op) > > break; > > + bool only_sign = allow_short_sign_mismatch > > + && TYPE_SIGN (type) != TYPE_SIGN (unprom[i].type) > > + && TYPE_PRECISION (type) == TYPE_PRECISION > > (unprom[i].type); > > > > this could use the same tree_nop_conversion_p predicate. > > > > Otherwise the patch looks good. > > > > Thanks, > > Richard. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Tamar > > > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > > > * optabs.def (usdot_prod_optab): New. > > > * doc/md.texi: Document it and clarify other dot prod optabs. > > > * optabs-tree.h (enum optab_subtype): Add > > optab_vector_mixed_sign. > > > * optabs-tree.c (optab_for_tree_code): Support usdot_prod_optab. > > > * optabs.c (expand_widen_pattern_expr): Likewise. > > > * tree-cfg.c (verify_gimple_assign_ternary): Likewise. > > > * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_determine_dot_kind): New. > > > (vectorizable_reduction): Query dot-product kind. > > > * tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_supportable_direct_optab_p): Take > > optional > > > optab subtype. > > > (vect_joust_widened_type, vect_widened_op_tree): Optionally > > ignore > > > mismatch types. > > > (vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern): Support usdot_prod_optab. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Richard Biener > > > > Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 2:29 PM > > > > To: Tamar Christina > > > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4]middle-end Vect: Add support for > > > > dot-product where the sign for the multiplicant changes. > > > > > > > > On Mon, 10 May 2021, Tamar Christina wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Richard Biener > > > > > > Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 12:40 PM > > > > > > To: Tamar Christina > > > > > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd > > > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4]middle-end Vect: Add support for dot- > > product > > > > > > where the sign for the multiplicant changes. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 7 May 2021, Tamar Christina wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Richi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: Richard Biener > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 12:46 PM > > > > > > > > To: Tamar Christina > > > > > > > > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4]middle-end Vect: Add support for > > > > > > > > dot-product where the sign for the multiplicant changes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 5 May 2021, Tamar Christina wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch adds support for a dot product where the sign > > > > > > > > > of the multiplication arguments differ. i.e. one is > > > > > > > > > signed and one is unsigned but the precisions are the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define N 480 > > > > > > > > > #define SIGNEDNESS_1 unsigned #define SIGNEDNESS_2 > > > > > > > > > signed #define SIGNEDNESS_3 signed #define SIGNEDNESS_4 > > > > > > > > > unsigned > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SIGNEDNESS_1 int __attribute__ ((noipa)) f (SIGNEDNESS_1 > > > > > > > > > int res, > > > > > > > > > SIGNEDNESS_3 char *restrict a, > > > > > > > > > SIGNEDNESS_4 char *restrict b) { > > > > > > > > > for (__INTPTR_TYPE__ i = 0; i < N; ++i) > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > int av = a[i]; > > > > > > > > > int bv = b[i]; > > > > > > > > > SIGNEDNESS_2 short mult = av * bv; > > > > > > > > > res += mult; > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > return res; > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The operations are performed as if the operands were > > extended > > > > > > > > > to a 32-bit > > > > > > > > value. > > > > > > > > > As such this operation isn't valid if there is an > > > > > > > > > intermediate conversion to an unsigned value. i.e. if > > > > > > > > > SIGNEDNESS_2 is > > unsigned. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more over if the signs of SIGNEDNESS_3 and SIGNEDNESS_4 > > > > > > > > > are flipped the same optab is used but the operands are > > > > > > > > > flipped in the optab > > > > > > > > expansion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To support this the patch extends the dot-product > > > > > > > > > detection to optionally ignore operands with different > > > > > > > > > signs and stores this information in the optab subtype > > > > > > > > > which is now made a > > bitfield. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The subtype can now additionally controls which optab an > > > > > > > > > EXPR can expand > > > > > > > > to. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no > > issues. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok for master? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Tamar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * optabs.def (usdot_prod_optab): New. > > > > > > > > > * doc/md.texi: Document it. > > > > > > > > > * optabs-tree.c (optab_for_tree_code): Support > > > > usdot_prod_optab. > > > > > > > > > * optabs-tree.h (enum optab_subtype): Likewise. > > > > > > > > > * optabs.c (expand_widen_pattern_expr): Likewise. > > > > > > > > > * tree-cfg.c (verify_gimple_assign_ternary): Likewise. > > > > > > > > > * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_determine_dot_kind): New. > > > > > > > > > (vectorizable_reduction): Query dot-product kind. > > > > > > > > > * tree-vect-patterns.c (vect_supportable_direct_optab_p): > > > > > > > > > Take > > > > > > > > optional > > > > > > > > > optab subtype. > > > > > > > > > (vect_joust_widened_type, vect_widened_op_tree): > > > > Optionally > > > > > > > > ignore > > > > > > > > > mismatch types. > > > > > > > > > (vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern): Support usdot_prod_optab. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- inline copy of patch -- diff --git a/gcc/doc/md.texi > > > > > > > > > b/gcc/doc/md.texi index > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > d166a0debedf4d8edf55c842bcf4ff4690b3e9ce..baf20416e63745097825fc30fd > > > > > > > > f2 > > > > > > > > > e66bc80d7d23 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/gcc/doc/md.texi > > > > > > > > > +++ b/gcc/doc/md.texi > > > > > > > > > @@ -5440,11 +5440,13 @@ Like > > @samp{fold_left_plus_@var{m}}, > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > takes > > > > > > > > > an additional mask operand @item > > > > > > > > > @samp{sdot_prod@var{m}} > > > > > > @cindex > > > > > > > > > @code{udot_prod@var{m}} instruction pattern @itemx > > > > > > > > > @samp{udot_prod@var{m}} > > > > > > > > > +@cindex @code{usdot_prod@var{m}} instruction pattern > > @itemx > > > > > > > > > +@samp{usdot_prod@var{m}} > > > > > > > > > Compute the sum of the products of two signed/unsigned > > > > elements. > > > > > > > > > -Operand 1 and operand 2 are of the same mode. Their > > > > > > > > > product, which is of a -wider mode, is computed and added to > operand 3. > > > > > > > > > Operand 3 is of a mode equal or -wider than the mode of > > > > > > > > > the product. The result is placed in operand 0, which > > > > > > > > > -is of the same mode > > > > > > as operand 3. > > > > > > > > > +Operand 1 and operand 2 are of the same mode but may > > > > > > > > > +differ in > > > > > > signs. > > > > > > > > > +Their product, which is of a wider mode, is computed > > > > > > > > > +and added to > > > > > > > > operand 3. > > > > > > > > > +Operand 3 is of a mode equal or wider than the mode of > > > > > > > > > +the > > > > product. > > > > > > > > > +The result is placed in operand 0, which is of the same > > > > > > > > > +mode as > > > > > > operand 3. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This doesn't really say what the 's', 'u' and 'us' specify. > > > > > > > > Since we're doing a widen multiplication and then a > > > > > > > > non-widening addition we only need to know the effective > > > > > > > > sign of the multiplication so I think > > > > > > the existing 's' and 'u' > > > > > > > > are enough to cover all cases? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The existing 's' and 'u' enforce that both operands of the > > > > > > > multiplication are of the same sign. So for e.g. 'u' both > > > > > > > operand must be > > > > > > unsigned. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the `us` case one can be signed and one unsigned. > > > > > > > Operationally this does a sign extension to the wider type > > > > > > > for the signed value, and the unsigned value gets zero > > > > > > > extended first, and then converts it to unsigned to perform > > > > > > > the unsigned multiplication, conforming to the C > > > > > > promotion rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TL;DR; Without a new optab I can't tell during expansion > > > > > > > which semantic the operation had at the gimple/C level as > > > > > > > modes don't > > carry > > > > signs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Long version: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The problem with using the existing patterns, because of > > > > > > > their enforcement of `av` and `bv` being the same sign is > > > > > > > that we can't remove the explicit sign extensions, but the > > > > > > > multiplication must be done on > > > > > > the sign/zero extended char input in the same sign. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which means (unless I am mistaken) to get the correct > > > > > > > result, you can't use neither `udot` nor `sdot` as > > > > > > > semantically these would zero or sign extend both operands > > > > > > > from char to int to perform the multiplication in the same > > > > > > > sigh. Whereas in this case, one parameter is zero > > > > > > and one parameter is sign extended and the result is always an > > > > > > unsigned number. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So basically > > > > > > > > > > > > > > udot == > > > > > > > c = zero-ext (a) * zero-ext (b) sdot > > > > > > signed > > > > > > > b> == > > > > > > > c = sign-ext (a) * sign-ext (b) usdot > > > > > > unsigned a, signed b> == > > > > > > > c = ((unsigned-conv) sign-ext (a)) * zero-ext (b) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So semantically the existing optabs won't fit here. udot > > > > > > > would internally promote to unsigned types before the > > > > > > > multiplication so the result of the multiplication would be > > > > > > > wrong. sdot would promote both to > > > > > > signed and do signed multiplication, so the result is also wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now if I relax the constraint on the signs of udot and sdot > > > > > > > there are two > > > > > > problems: > > > > > > > RTL Modes don't contain signs. So a target can't tell me > > > > > > > how the operands > > > > > > will be promoted. > > > > > > > So: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) I can't really check which semantics the target will > > > > > > > adhere to on > > > > > > expansion. > > > > > > > 2) at expand time I have no way to differentiate between the > > > > > > > two > > > > > > instructions variants, given just modes > > > > > > > I can't tell whether I expand to the normal dot-product > > > > > > > or the new > > > > > > instruction. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ah, OK. Indeed with such a weird instruction the new variant > > > > > > makes > > > > sense. > > > > > > Still can you please amend the optab documentation to say > > > > > > which operand is unsigned and which is signed? Just 'may differ in > signs' > > > > > > is bad. > > > > > > > > > > Sure, will expand on it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since the multiplication is commutative I wonder why you need > > > > > > to handle both signed_to_unsigned and unsigned_to_signed - we > > should > > > > > > just enforce a canonical order (like the optab does). > > > > > > > > > > Sure, I thought it would have been better to change the order at > > > > > expand time, but can do so at detection time. > > > > > > > > > > > I also think it's a particular bad fit for the bad > > > > > > optab_for_tree_code API - would any of that improve when using > > > > > > a direct internal function here? > > > > > > > > > > Somewhat, but this has considerable knock on effects, e.g. > > > > > currently DOT_PROD is treated as a widening operation and so is > > > > > handled by supportable_widening_operation which does not support > > > > > calls. There's > > a > > > > > significant number of places which work on the tree EXPR > > > > > (including > > > > constant folding) which all need to be changed. > > > > > > > > > > > In particular all the changes around optab_subtype look like > > > > > > they make a bad API worse ... at least a single > > > > > > optab_vector_mixed_sign should suffice here, no need to make it a > flags kind. > > > > > > > > > > The reason I did so is because depending on where the query is > > > > > done it does use different subtypes currently. During detection > > > > > it uses optab_default, and during vectorization optab_vector. > > > > > For this instruction this difference doesn't seem to be used, > > > > > but did not want to > > > > lose this information in case something depended on it. > > > > > > > > > > But can make it just one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* If we have a sign changing dot product we need to check > > > > > > + that > > the > > > > > > + promoted type if unsigned has at least the same > > > > > > + precision as the > > > > > > final > > > > > > + type of the dot-product. */ if (subtype != > > > > > > + optab_default) > > > > > > + { > > > > > > + tree mult_type = TREE_TYPE (unprom_mult.op); > > > > > > + if (TYPE_SIGN (mult_type) == UNSIGNED > > > > > > + && TYPE_PRECISION (mult_type) < TYPE_PRECISION (type)) > > > > > > + return NULL; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand this - how do we ever arrive at a result > > > > > > with less > > > > precision? > > > > > > > > > > The user could have manually truncated the results, i.e. in the > > > > > detection code notice `mult` > > > > > > > > > > int av = a[i]; > > > > > int bv = b[i]; > > > > > SIGNEDNESS_2 short mult = av * bv; > > > > > res += mult; > > > > > > > > > > which is a short, so it's manually truncating the multiplication > > > > > which is done as int by the instruction. If `mult` is unsigned > > > > > then it will truncate the result if the signed input to usdot > > > > > was negative, unless the Intermediate calculation is of the same > > > > > precision as the instruction. i.e. if mult is unsigned int then > > > > > there's no truncation going on, it's casting from int to > > > > > unsigned int so it's safe to use then as the instruction does the same > thing internally. > > > > > > > > It looks to me that we simply should only ever allow sing-changes > > > > from multiplication result to the sum. At least your example > > > > above is not > > special to > > > > mixed sign multiplications, no? > > > > > > > > > > And why's this not an issue for signed multiplication? > > > > > > > > > > It is, but in that case it's handled by the type jousting, which > > > > > doesn't allow the type mismatch. i.e. > > > > > > > > > > #define SIGNEDNESS_1 unsigned > > > > > #define SIGNEDNESS_2 unsigned > > > > > #define SIGNEDNESS_3 signed > > > > > #define SIGNEDNESS_4 signed > > > > > > > > > > SIGNEDNESS_1 int __attribute__ ((noipa)) f (SIGNEDNESS_1 int > > > > > res, > > > > > SIGNEDNESS_3 char *restrict a, > > > > > SIGNEDNESS_4 char *restrict b) { > > > > > for (__INTPTR_TYPE__ i = 0; i < N; ++i) > > > > > { > > > > > int av = a[i]; > > > > > int bv = b[i]; > > > > > SIGNEDNESS_2 short mult = av * bv; > > > > > res += mult; > > > > > } > > > > > return res; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > Is also not detected as a dot product. By adding the carve out > > > > > to the widen multiplication detection it now allows this case > > > > > through so I handle it in the detection code. Thinking about it > > > > > now, it seems more logical to add this case handling inside the > > > > > type jousting code as I don't think it's ever something you'd want. > > > > > > > > Yeah, I think we only need to look through sign changes on the > > multiplication > > > > result. > > > > > > > > > > Also... > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* If we have a sign changing dot-product the dot-product > > > > > > + itself does > > > > > > any > > > > > > + sign conversions, so consume the type and use the > > > > > > + unpromoted > > > > types. > > > > > > */ > > > > > > + tree mult_arg1, mult_arg2; > > > > > > + if (subtype == optab_default) > > > > > > + { > > > > > > + mult_arg1 = mult_oprnd[0]; > > > > > > + mult_arg2 = mult_oprnd[1]; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + else > > > > > > + { > > > > > > + mult_arg1 = unprom0[0].op; > > > > > > + mult_arg2 = unprom0[1].op; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > pattern_stmt = gimple_build_assign (var, DOT_PROD_EXPR, > > > > > > - mult_oprnd[0], mult_oprnd[1], > > > > > > oprnd1); > > > > > > + mult_arg1, mult_arg2, > > > > > > + oprnd1); > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought DOT_PROD always performs the promotion. Maybe > > > > mult_oprnd > > > > > > and unprom0 are just misnamed here? > > > > > > > > > > Somewhat, in a normal dot-product the sign of the multiplication > > > > > are the same here as the "unpromoted" types. So after > > vect_convert_input > > > > > these two types are the same. > > > > > > > > > > However because here the sign changes and to maintain the > > > > > semantics > > of > > > > > the C code there's an extra conversion here to get the arguments > > > > > in the same sign. That needs to be stripped before given to the > > > > > instruction which does the conversion internally. > > > > > > > > Yes, but then why's that not done by the detection code? That is, > > > > does it (mis-)handle the (int)short_a * (int)(unsigned > > > > short)short_b where we'd want the mixed-sign handling and not > > > > strip the unsigned short conversion from short_b? > > > > > > > > Richard. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Tamar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Tamar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The tree.def docs say the sum is also possibly widening > > > > > > > > but I don't see this covered by the optab so we should > > > > > > > > eventually remove this feature from the tree side. In > > > > > > > > fact the tree-cfg.c verifier requires the addition to be > > > > > > > > not widening - thus only tree.def needs > > > > > > adjustment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @cindex @code{ssad@var{m}} instruction pattern @item > > > > > > > > > @samp{ssad@var{m}} diff --git a/gcc/optabs-tree.h > > > > > > > > > b/gcc/optabs-tree.h index > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > c3aaa1a416991e856d3e24da45968a92ebada82c..ebc23ac86fe99057f375781c2f > > > > > > > > 19 > > > > > > > > > 90e0548ba08d 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/gcc/optabs-tree.h > > > > > > > > > +++ b/gcc/optabs-tree.h > > > > > > > > > @@ -27,11 +27,29 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. > > If > > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > see > > > > > > > > > shift amount vs. machines that take a vector for the > > > > > > > > > shift > > amount. > > > > > > > > > */ enum optab_subtype { > > > > > > > > > - optab_default, > > > > > > > > > - optab_scalar, > > > > > > > > > - optab_vector > > > > > > > > > + optab_default = 1 << 0, optab_scalar = 1 << 1, > > > > > > > > > + optab_vector = 1 << 2, optab_signed_to_unsigned = 1 > > > > > > > > > + << 3, optab_unsigned_to_signed = > > > > > > > > > + 1 << 4 > > > > > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +/* Override the OrEqual-operator so we can use > > optab_subtype > > > > > > > > > +as a bit flag. */ inline enum optab_subtype& operator > > > > > > > > > +|= (enum > > > > > > > > optab_subtype& > > > > > > > > > +a, enum optab_subtype b) { > > > > > > > > > + return a = static_cast(static_cast(a) > > > > > > > > > + | > static_cast(b)); } > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > +/* Override the Or-operator so we can use optab_subtype > > > > > > > > > +as a bit flag. */ inline enum optab_subtype operator | > > > > > > > > > +(enum optab_subtype a, enum optab_subtype b) { > > > > > > > > > + return static_cast(static_cast(a) > > > > > > > > > + | static_cast(b)); } > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > /* Return the optab used for computing the given > > > > > > > > > operation on the type > > > > > > > > given by > > > > > > > > > the second argument. The third argument > > > > > > > > > distinguishes between the > > > > > > > > types of > > > > > > > > > vector shifts and rotates. */ diff --git > > > > > > > > > a/gcc/optabs-tree.c b/gcc/optabs-tree.c index > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 95ffe397c23e80c105afea52e9d47216bf52f55a..2f60004545defc53182e004eea > > > > > > > > 1e > > > > > > > > > 5c22b7453072 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/gcc/optabs-tree.c > > > > > > > > > +++ b/gcc/optabs-tree.c > > > > > > > > > @@ -127,7 +127,17 @@ optab_for_tree_code (enum > tree_code > > > > code, > > > > > > > > const_tree type, > > > > > > > > > return TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) ? usum_widen_optab : > > > > > > > > > ssum_widen_optab; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > case DOT_PROD_EXPR: > > > > > > > > > - return TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) ? udot_prod_optab : > > > > > > sdot_prod_optab; > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + gcc_assert (subtype & optab_default > > > > > > > > > + || subtype & optab_vector > > > > > > > > > + || subtype & optab_signed_to_unsigned > > > > > > > > > + || subtype & optab_unsigned_to_signed); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + if (subtype & (optab_unsigned_to_signed | > > > > > > > > optab_signed_to_unsigned)) > > > > > > > > > + return usdot_prod_optab; > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + return (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) ? udot_prod_optab : > > > > > > > > sdot_prod_optab); > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > case SAD_EXPR: > > > > > > > > > return TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) ? usad_optab : > > > > > > > > > ssad_optab; diff --git a/gcc/optabs.c b/gcc/optabs.c > > > > > > > > > index > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > f4614a394587787293dc8b680a38901f7906f61c..2e18b76de1412eab71971753ac > > > > > > > > 67 > > > > > > > > > 8597c0d00098 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/gcc/optabs.c > > > > > > > > > +++ b/gcc/optabs.c > > > > > > > > > @@ -262,6 +262,11 @@ expand_widen_pattern_expr (sepops > > ops, > > > > > > > > > rtx op0, > > > > > > > > rtx op1, rtx wide_op, > > > > > > > > > bool sbool = false; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > oprnd0 = ops->op0; > > > > > > > > > + if (nops >= 2) > > > > > > > > > + oprnd1 = ops->op1; > > > > > > > > > + if (nops >= 3) > > > > > > > > > + oprnd2 = ops->op2; > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > tmode0 = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (oprnd0)); > > > > > > > > > if (ops->code == VEC_UNPACK_FIX_TRUNC_HI_EXPR > > > > > > > > > || ops->code == VEC_UNPACK_FIX_TRUNC_LO_EXPR) > @@ > > > > > > > > > - > > > > 285,6 > > > > > > > > +290,27 > > > > > > > > > @@ expand_widen_pattern_expr (sepops ops, rtx op0, rtx > > > > > > > > > op1, rtx > > > > > > > > wide_op, > > > > > > > > > ? vec_unpacks_sbool_hi_optab : > > > > vec_unpacks_sbool_lo_optab); > > > > > > > > > sbool = true; > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > + else if (ops->code == DOT_PROD_EXPR) > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + enum optab_subtype subtype = optab_default; > > > > > > > > > + signop sign1 = TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE (oprnd0)); > > > > > > > > > + signop sign2 = TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE (oprnd1)); > > > > > > > > > + if (sign1 == sign2) > > > > > > > > > + ; > > > > > > > > > + else if (sign1 == SIGNED && sign2 == UNSIGNED) > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + subtype |= optab_signed_to_unsigned; > > > > > > > > > + /* Same as optab_unsigned_to_signed but flip the > > > > operands. */ > > > > > > > > > + std::swap (op0, op1); > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > + else if (sign1 == UNSIGNED && sign2 == SIGNED) > > > > > > > > > + subtype |= optab_unsigned_to_signed; > > > > > > > > > + else > > > > > > > > > + gcc_unreachable (); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + widen_pattern_optab > > > > > > > > > + = optab_for_tree_code (ops->code, TREE_TYPE > (oprnd0), > > > > subtype); > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > else > > > > > > > > > widen_pattern_optab > > > > > > > > > = optab_for_tree_code (ops->code, TREE_TYPE > > > > > > > > > (oprnd0), optab_default); @@ -298,10 +324,7 @@ > > > > expand_widen_pattern_expr > > > > > > > > (sepops ops, rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx wide_op, > > > > > > > > > gcc_assert (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (nops >= 2) > > > > > > > > > - { > > > > > > > > > - oprnd1 = ops->op1; > > > > > > > > > - tmode1 = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (oprnd1)); > > > > > > > > > - } > > > > > > > > > + tmode1 = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (oprnd1)); > > > > > > > > > else if (sbool) > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > nops = 2; > > > > > > > > > @@ -316,7 +339,6 @@ expand_widen_pattern_expr (sepops > > ops, > > > > rtx > > > > > > > > > op0, > > > > > > > > rtx op1, rtx wide_op, > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > gcc_assert (tmode1 == tmode0); > > > > > > > > > gcc_assert (op1); > > > > > > > > > - oprnd2 = ops->op2; > > > > > > > > > wmode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (oprnd2)); > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/optabs.def b/gcc/optabs.def index > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > b192a9d070b8aa72e5676b2eaa020b5bdd7ffcc8..f470c2168378cec840edf7fbd > > > > > > > > b7c > > > > > > > > > 18615baae928 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/gcc/optabs.def > > > > > > > > > +++ b/gcc/optabs.def > > > > > > > > > @@ -352,6 +352,7 @@ OPTAB_D (uavg_ceil_optab, > > "uavg$a3_ceil") > > > > > > > > OPTAB_D > > > > > > > > > (sdot_prod_optab, "sdot_prod$I$a") OPTAB_D > > > > (ssum_widen_optab, > > > > > > > > > "widen_ssum$I$a3") OPTAB_D (udot_prod_optab, > > > > "udot_prod$I$a") > > > > > > > > > +OPTAB_D (usdot_prod_optab, "usdot_prod$I$a") > > > > > > > > > OPTAB_D (usum_widen_optab, "widen_usum$I$a3") > > OPTAB_D > > > > > > > > (usad_optab, > > > > > > > > > "usad$I$a") OPTAB_D (ssad_optab, "ssad$I$a") diff --git > > > > > > > > > a/gcc/tree-cfg.c b/gcc/tree-cfg.c index > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7e3aae5f9c28a49feedc7cc66e8ac0d476b9f28a..58b55bb648ad97d514f1fa18bb > > > > > > > > 00 > > > > > > > > > 808fd2678b42 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/gcc/tree-cfg.c > > > > > > > > > +++ b/gcc/tree-cfg.c > > > > > > > > > @@ -4421,7 +4421,8 @@ verify_gimple_assign_ternary > > > > > > > > > (gassign > > > > *stmt) > > > > > > > > > && !SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (rhs1_type)) > > > > > > > > > || (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (lhs_type) > > > > > > > > > && !SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (lhs_type)))) > > > > > > > > > - || !types_compatible_p (rhs1_type, rhs2_type) > > > > > > > > > + || (!types_compatible_p (rhs1_type, rhs2_type) > > > > > > > > > + && TYPE_SIGN (rhs1_type) == TYPE_SIGN > > > > (rhs2_type)) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's not restrictive enough. I suggest you use > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > && element_precision (rhs1_type) != > > > > > > > > element_precision > > > > > > > > (rhs2_type) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As said, I'm not sure all the changes in this patch are required. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please elaborate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Richard. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || !useless_type_conversion_p (lhs_type, rhs3_type) > > > > > > > > > || maybe_lt (GET_MODE_SIZE (element_mode > > > > (rhs3_type)), > > > > > > > > > 2 * GET_MODE_SIZE (element_mode > > > > (rhs1_type)))) > > > > > > > > diff --git > > > > > > > > > a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c index > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 93fa2928e001c154bd4a9a73ac1dbbbf73c456df..cb8f5fbb6abca181c4171194d1 > > > > > > > > 9f > > > > > > > > > ec29ec6e4176 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c > > > > > > > > > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c > > > > > > > > > @@ -6401,6 +6401,33 @@ build_vect_cond_expr (enum > > tree_code > > > > > > code, > > > > > > > > tree vop[3], tree mask, > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +/* Determine the optab_subtype to use for the given > > > > > > > > > +CODE > > and > > > > STMT. > > > > > > > > For > > > > > > > > > + most CODE this will be optab_vector, however for > > > > > > > > > + certain operations > > > > > > > > such as > > > > > > > > > + DOT_PROD_EXPR where the operation can different > > > > > > > > > + signs for the > > > > > > > > operands we > > > > > > > > > + need to be able to pick the right optabs. */ > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > +static enum optab_subtype vect_determine_dot_kind > > > > > > > > > +(tree_code code, stmt_vec_info > > > > > > > > > +stmt_vinfo) { > > > > > > > > > + enum optab_subtype subtype = optab_vector; > > > > > > > > > + switch (code) > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + case DOT_PROD_EXPR: > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + gassign *stmt = as_a > (STMT_VINFO_STMT > > > > (stmt_vinfo)); > > > > > > > > > + signop rhs1_sign = TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE > > > > > > > > > +(gimple_assign_rhs1 > > > > > > > > (stmt))); > > > > > > > > > + signop rhs2_sign = TYPE_SIGN (TREE_TYPE > > > > > > > > > +(gimple_assign_rhs2 > > > > > > > > (stmt))); > > > > > > > > > + if (rhs1_sign != rhs2_sign) > > > > > > > > > + subtype |= optab_unsigned_to_signed; > > > > > > > > > + break; > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > + default: > > > > > > > > > + break; > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + return subtype; > > > > > > > > > +} > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > /* Function vectorizable_reduction. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check if STMT_INFO performs a reduction operation > > > > > > > > > that can be > > > > > > > > vectorized. > > > > > > > > > @@ -7189,7 +7216,8 @@ vectorizable_reduction > > > > > > > > > (loop_vec_info > > > > > > > > loop_vinfo, > > > > > > > > > bool ok = true; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* 4.1. check support for the operation in the loop */ > > > > > > > > > - optab optab = optab_for_tree_code (code, vectype_in, > > > > > > optab_vector); > > > > > > > > > + enum optab_subtype subtype = > > > > > > > > > + vect_determine_dot_kind (code, > > > > > > > > stmt_info); > > > > > > > > > + optab optab = optab_for_tree_code (code, > > > > > > > > > + vectype_in, subtype); > > > > > > > > > if (!optab) > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > if (dump_enabled_p ()) diff --git > > > > > > > > > a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c > > > > > > > > > index > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 441d6cd28c4eaded7abd756164890dbcffd2f3b8..943c001fb13777b4d1513841f > > > > > > > > a84 > > > > > > > > > 942316846d5e 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c > > > > > > > > > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c > > > > > > > > > @@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ vect_get_external_def_edge > (vec_info > > > > > > > > > *vinfo, tree > > > > > > > > > var) static bool vect_supportable_direct_optab_p > > > > > > > > > (vec_info *vinfo, tree otype, tree_code code, > > > > > > > > > tree itype, tree *vecotype_out, > > > > > > > > > - tree *vecitype_out = NULL) > > > > > > > > > + tree *vecitype_out = NULL, > > > > > > > > > + enum optab_subtype > subtype = > > > > > > > > optab_default) > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > tree vecitype = get_vectype_for_scalar_type (vinfo, itype); > > > > > > > > > if (!vecitype) > > > > > > > > > @@ -211,7 +212,7 @@ vect_supportable_direct_optab_p > > (vec_info > > > > > > > > > *vinfo, > > > > > > > > tree otype, tree_code code, > > > > > > > > > if (!vecotype) > > > > > > > > > return false; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - optab optab = optab_for_tree_code (code, vecitype, > > > > > > > > > optab_default); > > > > > > > > > + optab optab = optab_for_tree_code (code, vecitype, > > > > > > > > > + subtype); > > > > > > > > > if (!optab) > > > > > > > > > return false; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -487,14 +488,31 @@ vect_joust_widened_integer (tree > > type, > > > > > > > > > bool shift_p, tree op, } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Return true if the common supertype of NEW_TYPE and > > > > > > > > *COMMON_TYPE > > > > > > > > > - is narrower than type, storing the supertype in > > *COMMON_TYPE > > > > if > > > > > > so. > > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > > + is narrower than type, storing the supertype in > > > > > > > > > + *COMMON_TYPE if > > > > > > so. > > > > > > > > > + If ALLOW_SHORT_SIGN_MISMATCH then accept that > > > > > > *COMMON_TYPE > > > > > > > > and NEW_TYPE > > > > > > > > > + may be of different signs but equal precision. */ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > static bool > > > > > > > > > -vect_joust_widened_type (tree type, tree new_type, tree > > > > > > > > *common_type) > > > > > > > > > +vect_joust_widened_type (tree type, tree new_type, tree > > > > > > > > *common_type, > > > > > > > > > + bool allow_short_sign_mismatch = > false) > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > if (types_compatible_p (*common_type, new_type)) > > > > > > > > > return true; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Check if the mismatch is only in the sign and if we have > > > > > > > > > + allow_short_sign_mismatch then allow it. */ > > > > > > > > > + if (allow_short_sign_mismatch > > > > > > > > > + && TYPE_SIGN (*common_type) != TYPE_SIGN > (new_type)) > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + bool sign = TYPE_SIGN (*common_type) == UNSIGNED; > > > > > > > > > + tree eq_type > > > > > > > > > + = build_nonstandard_integer_type (TYPE_PRECISION > > > > (new_type), > > > > > > > > > + sign); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + if (types_compatible_p (*common_type, eq_type)) > > > > > > > > > + return true; > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > /* See if *COMMON_TYPE can hold all values of NEW_TYPE. > > */ > > > > > > > > > if ((TYPE_PRECISION (new_type) < TYPE_PRECISION > > > > (*common_type)) > > > > > > > > > && (TYPE_UNSIGNED (new_type) || !TYPE_UNSIGNED > > > > > > > > (*common_type))) > > > > > > > > > @@ -532,6 +550,9 @@ vect_joust_widened_type (tree type, > > tree > > > > > > > > new_type, tree *common_type) > > > > > > > > > to a type that (a) is narrower than the result of > > > > > > > > > STMT_INFO > > and > > > > > > > > > (b) can hold all leaf operand values. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + If ALLOW_SHORT_SIGN_MISMATCH then allow that the > > > > > > > > > + signs > > of > > > > > > > > > + the > > > > > > > > operands > > > > > > > > > + may differ in signs but not in precision. > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > Return 0 if STMT_INFO isn't such a tree, or if no > > > > > > > > > such > > > > COMMON_TYPE > > > > > > > > > exists. */ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -539,7 +560,8 @@ static unsigned int > > vect_widened_op_tree > > > > > > > > > (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info, tree_code code, > > > > > > > > > tree_code widened_code, bool shift_p, > > > > > > > > > unsigned int max_nops, > > > > > > > > > - vect_unpromoted_value *unprom, tree > > > > *common_type) > > > > > > > > > + vect_unpromoted_value *unprom, tree > > > > *common_type, > > > > > > > > > + bool allow_short_sign_mismatch = false) > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > /* Check for an integer operation with the right code. */ > > > > > > > > > gassign *assign = dyn_cast > > > > > > > > > (stmt_info->stmt); @@ > > > > > > > > > -600,7 > > > > > > > > > +622,8 @@ vect_widened_op_tree (vec_info *vinfo, > > > > stmt_vec_info > > > > > > > > stmt_info, tree_code code, > > > > > > > > > = vinfo->lookup_def (this_unprom->op); > > > > > > > > > nops = vect_widened_op_tree (vinfo, > > > > > > > > > def_stmt_info, > > > > code, > > > > > > > > > widened_code, shift_p, > > > > max_nops, > > > > > > > > > - this_unprom, > > > > common_type); > > > > > > > > > + this_unprom, > > > > common_type, > > > > > > > > > + > > > > allow_short_sign_mismatch); > > > > > > > > > if (nops == 0) > > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -617,7 +640,8 @@ vect_widened_op_tree (vec_info > > > > > > > > > *vinfo, > > > > > > > > stmt_vec_info stmt_info, tree_code code, > > > > > > > > > if (i == 0) > > > > > > > > > *common_type = this_unprom->type; > > > > > > > > > else if (!vect_joust_widened_type (type, > > > > > > > > > this_unprom- > > > > >type, > > > > > > > > > - common_type)) > > > > > > > > > + > common_type, > > > > > > > > > + > > > > allow_short_sign_mismatch)) > > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > @@ -888,21 +912,24 @@ vect_reassociating_reduction_p > > (vec_info > > > > > > > > > *vinfo, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Try to find the following pattern: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - type x_t, y_t; > > > > > > > > > + type1a x_t > > > > > > > > > + type1b y_t; > > > > > > > > > TYPE1 prod; > > > > > > > > > TYPE2 sum = init; > > > > > > > > > loop: > > > > > > > > > sum_0 = phi > > > > > > > > > S1 x_t = ... > > > > > > > > > S2 y_t = ... > > > > > > > > > - S3 x_T = (TYPE1) x_t; > > > > > > > > > - S4 y_T = (TYPE1) y_t; > > > > > > > > > + S3 x_T = (TYPE3) x_t; > > > > > > > > > + S4 y_T = (TYPE4) y_t; > > > > > > > > > S5 prod = x_T * y_T; > > > > > > > > > [S6 prod = (TYPE2) prod; #optional] > > > > > > > > > S7 sum_1 = prod + sum_0; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - where 'TYPE1' is exactly double the size of type 'type', and > > 'TYPE2' > > > > is > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > - same size of 'TYPE1' or bigger. This is a special case of a > > reduction > > > > > > > > > + where 'TYPE1' is exactly double the size of type > > > > > > > > > + 'type1a' and > > > > 'type1b', > > > > > > > > > + the sign of 'TYPE1' must be one of 'type1a' or > > > > > > > > > + 'type1b' but the > > > > sign of > > > > > > > > > + 'type1a' and 'type1b' can differ. 'TYPE2' is the > > > > > > > > > + same size of > > 'TYPE1' > > > > or > > > > > > > > > + bigger and must be the same sign. This is a special > > > > > > > > > + case of a reduction > > > > > > > > > computation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Input: > > > > > > > > > @@ -939,15 +966,16 @@ vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern > > (vec_info > > > > > > > > > *vinfo, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Look for the following pattern > > > > > > > > > DX = (TYPE1) X; > > > > > > > > > - DY = (TYPE1) Y; > > > > > > > > > + DY = (TYPE2) Y; > > > > > > > > > DPROD = DX * DY; > > > > > > > > > - DDPROD = (TYPE2) DPROD; > > > > > > > > > + DDPROD = (TYPE3) DPROD; > > > > > > > > > sum_1 = DDPROD + sum_0; > > > > > > > > > In which > > > > > > > > > - DX is double the size of X > > > > > > > > > - DY is double the size of Y > > > > > > > > > - DX, DY, DPROD all have the same type but the sign > > > > > > > > > - between DX, DY and DPROD can differ. > > > > > > > > > + between DX, DY and DPROD can differ. The sign of DPROD > > > > > > > > > + is one of the signs of DX or DY. > > > > > > > > > - sum is the same size of DPROD or bigger > > > > > > > > > - sum has been recognized as a reduction variable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -986,14 +1014,41 @@ vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern > > (vec_info > > > > > > *vinfo, > > > > > > > > > inside the loop (in case we are analyzing an outer-loop). */ > > > > > > > > > vect_unpromoted_value unprom0[2]; > > > > > > > > > if (!vect_widened_op_tree (vinfo, mult_vinfo, > > > > > > > > > MULT_EXPR, > > > > > > > > WIDEN_MULT_EXPR, > > > > > > > > > - false, 2, unprom0, &half_type)) > > > > > > > > > + false, 2, unprom0, &half_type, > true)) > > > > > > > > > return NULL; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* Check to see if there is a sign change happening > > > > > > > > > + in the operands of > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > + multiplication and pick the appropriate optab subtype. > > > > > > > > > +*/ > > > > > > > > > + enum optab_subtype subtype; > > > > > > > > > + tree rhs_type1 = unprom0[0].type; > > > > > > > > > + tree rhs_type2 = unprom0[1].type; > > > > > > > > > + if (TYPE_SIGN (rhs_type1) == TYPE_SIGN (rhs_type2)) > > > > > > > > > + subtype = optab_default; > > > > > > > > > + else if (TYPE_SIGN (rhs_type1) == SIGNED > > > > > > > > > + && TYPE_SIGN (rhs_type2) == UNSIGNED) > > > > > > > > > + subtype = optab_signed_to_unsigned; > > > > > > > > > + else if (TYPE_SIGN (rhs_type1) == UNSIGNED > > > > > > > > > + && TYPE_SIGN (rhs_type2) == SIGNED) > > > > > > > > > + subtype = optab_unsigned_to_signed; > > > > > > > > > + else > > > > > > > > > + gcc_unreachable (); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + /* If we have a sign changing dot product we need to > > > > > > > > > + check > > that > > > > the > > > > > > > > > + promoted type if unsigned has at least the same > > > > > > > > > + precision as the > > > > > > final > > > > > > > > > + type of the dot-product. */ > > > > > > > > > + if (subtype != optab_default) > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + tree mult_type = TREE_TYPE (unprom_mult.op); > > > > > > > > > + if (TYPE_SIGN (mult_type) == UNSIGNED > > > > > > > > > + && TYPE_PRECISION (mult_type) < TYPE_PRECISION > (type)) > > > > > > > > > + return NULL; > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > vect_pattern_detected ("vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern", > > > > > > > > > last_stmt); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tree half_vectype; > > > > > > > > > if (!vect_supportable_direct_optab_p (vinfo, type, > > > > > > > > > DOT_PROD_EXPR, > > > > > > > > half_type, > > > > > > > > > - type_out, &half_vectype)) > > > > > > > > > + type_out, > &half_vectype, > > > > subtype)) > > > > > > > > > return NULL; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Get the inputs in the appropriate types. */ @@ > > > > > > > > > -1002,8 > > > > > > > > > +1057,22 @@ vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern (vec_info > > > > > > > > > +*vinfo, > > > > > > > > > unprom0, half_vectype); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > var = vect_recog_temp_ssa_var (type, NULL); > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > + /* If we have a sign changing dot-product the > > > > > > > > > + dot-product itself does > > > > > > any > > > > > > > > > + sign conversions, so consume the type and use the > > > > > > > > > + unpromoted types. */ tree mult_arg1, mult_arg2; if > > > > > > > > > + (subtype == > > > > > > > > > + optab_default) > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + mult_arg1 = mult_oprnd[0]; > > > > > > > > > + mult_arg2 = mult_oprnd[1]; > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > + else > > > > > > > > > + { > > > > > > > > > + mult_arg1 = unprom0[0].op; > > > > > > > > > + mult_arg2 = unprom0[1].op; > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > pattern_stmt = gimple_build_assign (var, DOT_PROD_EXPR, > > > > > > > > > - mult_oprnd[0], mult_oprnd[1], > > > > oprnd1); > > > > > > > > > + mult_arg1, mult_arg2, > oprnd1); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return pattern_stmt; > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Richard Biener SUSE Software Solutions > > > > > > > > Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany; > > GF: > > > > > > > > Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Richard Biener SUSE Software Solutions > > > > > > Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: > > > > > > Felix Imend?rffer; HRB 36809 (AG > > Nuernberg) > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Richard Biener SUSE Software Solutions > Germany > > > > GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Felix > > > > Imend?rffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg) > > > > > > > -- > > Richard Biener > > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 > > Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Felix Imend