From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from EUR02-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db5eur02on2047.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.249.47]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 248493858412 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:05:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 248493858412 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=RuxZbD87svPIq23DUjcHB0cJ7pFLocySNpBxcnfSJX5DvsMaVUwXtKLrLHYvkzS8igoUluQuoLliBSDKkaMyJ+45ncmkibJqyaNc1GlfyxpAqSIjDyqKsGcyh1XxxVVTSgMODky3LpKs5yk1skPSfqjSvU5d1GmOrhn89fveapA/ZnLJoly2Ai7zUNPbilx6JWSmz01Qaz1/DRPq/+31IhyHRTh7BZudTzzwibtoqgAFkyZY5cc0AUd5Z7GLH/Au0Dazqzy3Pc6IcpWOZ/YTVF8WzTtGdxCUKvExDT3yTN9/MrIHy2n9VNA/GjB2f4yTw16V2GLGJkFc8o0UPauTiA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=KKyz2Yy1P/gBAtesfkZCJ5Y24Ssz3IQzIMwiFxLSTMg=; b=g22pVELfg+bWYlhHLr1ci3NewGoKJ4eOUt5ya01QMdouYN7zZ42iiKG086Z+d8VzOOAyE7QYL9owNwxxDpvDhjYS6+fAiDXBXzExtUcOm9n5Xwl1spwOOBAlY50rJG0YO6G5pK/yI8ijDN2O0acEigWq5TvE+YzR2hLztzI+0+8/r1+oOtFsonwrdTSaDBfO72dRaBXGEAIsitpY4mKPNuBk8uQkhi9W4D1xZQWIs5Qllulea6MDniP66DxLTcyeWqVw+i4aUr80p/TyvPM1hzhOgZg8TrDvDQW3iFogtb73JuVV84zawqkMedzscEJdusXrS2tnAEUfYP9YWWXLog== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=gcc.gnu.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com]) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-armh-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KKyz2Yy1P/gBAtesfkZCJ5Y24Ssz3IQzIMwiFxLSTMg=; b=yHbk82Mxfoa3Af7k0Drdc2X4JlsAUN7WQCS+jidmctVA/c9mj7fnsAUtX4ZV8yKkauwdRVo+3lh8Rs06Trm+wu0JH99kajn/AFhxKW30mUacMfFVXw3F0dRJEH5Xc9R+lpWNGQb4m+E1gS1B2EEFFs1e1/j1rJHgJiXuW42yyJ4= Received: from AS9PR04CA0053.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:46a::7) by PAXPR08MB6333.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:102:15b::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5654.25; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:05:39 +0000 Received: from AM7EUR03FT035.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:46a:cafe::33) by AS9PR04CA0053.outlook.office365.com (2603:10a6:20b:46a::7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5654.25 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:05:39 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 63.35.35.123) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of arm.com designates 63.35.35.123 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=63.35.35.123; helo=64aa7808-outbound-1.mta.getcheckrecipient.com; pr=C Received: from 64aa7808-outbound-1.mta.getcheckrecipient.com (63.35.35.123) by AM7EUR03FT035.mail.protection.outlook.com (100.127.141.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5654.14 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:05:39 +0000 Received: ("Tessian outbound 9236804a5e9b:v124"); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:05:39 +0000 X-CheckRecipientChecked: true X-CR-MTA-CID: bea5367cf397ebe9 X-CR-MTA-TID: 64aa7808 Received: from 5190d744efef.1 by 64aa7808-outbound-1.mta.getcheckrecipient.com id 1DD24274-CB77-4354-A7F5-04355D5C976A.1; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:05:28 +0000 Received: from EUR05-DB8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com by 64aa7808-outbound-1.mta.getcheckrecipient.com with ESMTPS id 5190d744efef.1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:05:28 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Nts0paLNlSbWSevIonqaILVYlv5e79k6Sax4ovezAsNPUWE6CcLTeD/r82dkG2cBRbrGK6s4fz2CtIZ1zOP5lmSX184jp3z+Z92cOyTXNGhcoykZPsj2GhHNcdEFT1n+S2kR/RN1DyHu+vtuva4GJYTmhNOwaWoTg9v5bsIp/LUgjOAb1AZYKf2gUotEibM1xqQ6yDqJn5+8B9l/K6JZiWG2THXxb0LaVxDAhaedXTQ5pQCV8jd6D2LOMKExno5Ri8qtcUKeqx+ALsbTWVTsnx++HE5rpFvTMg9pKbc5wfndmSI/ojCx1bySW9jTZEUaPo8OzsmKz7VJ8h6ddo5kOQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=KKyz2Yy1P/gBAtesfkZCJ5Y24Ssz3IQzIMwiFxLSTMg=; b=kFnbPqOQ6cMxRkZuErIldaEzvnI6EO/iYIMTZIk6LV8Rv5as0fQ88kW4l6aEfmUK7CsAzEuXFRrjp65mZ+kzFy2qoZ3xzHRKHqzPIz0Tu1HkBtUf0VI4qRShOwq83DppCLjQmOgOxBJ1dIRQpgA01nObyqNdcdrjIx4Mxb7bJSN+wQTmgqtmtfNhR0j4qPSAQliCCgGuHWeOj/taLSFDiOu1lWeeg3FccdIZSX6ErxfIfTqoZSMiJxaujE+XbrXt9fmklgKL1PGuQQM8KXLkVIyeCw0TmJgLTcl3EB7Xxh1lNu+vKKluqc0EHwVMv/tKlslH2stoH5zuRkiTdmXqtg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-armh-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KKyz2Yy1P/gBAtesfkZCJ5Y24Ssz3IQzIMwiFxLSTMg=; b=yHbk82Mxfoa3Af7k0Drdc2X4JlsAUN7WQCS+jidmctVA/c9mj7fnsAUtX4ZV8yKkauwdRVo+3lh8Rs06Trm+wu0JH99kajn/AFhxKW30mUacMfFVXw3F0dRJEH5Xc9R+lpWNGQb4m+E1gS1B2EEFFs1e1/j1rJHgJiXuW42yyJ4= Received: from VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:803:13e::17) by DU2PR08MB7343.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:2f2::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5654.24; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:05:26 +0000 Received: from VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6529:66e5:e7d4:1a40]) by VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6529:66e5:e7d4:1a40%4]) with mapi id 15.20.5654.022; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:05:26 +0000 From: Tamar Christina To: Richard Biener CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , nd , "jeffreyalaw@gmail.com" , Richard Sandiford Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: RFC: On expansion of conditional branches, give hint if argument is a truth type to backend Thread-Topic: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: RFC: On expansion of conditional branches, give hint if argument is a truth type to backend Thread-Index: AQHYzy5cPtP/U576lE6Yh3eQBn/QMK3xiPyAgAAF5FA= Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:05:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Authentication-Results-Original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR08MB5325:EE_|DU2PR08MB7343:EE_|AM7EUR03FT035:EE_|PAXPR08MB6333:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 1a72b761-b7d8-4c68-f080-08da9faf0bd7 x-checkrecipientrouted: true nodisclaimer: true X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam-Untrusted: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info-Original: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230022)(4636009)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(451199015)(76116006)(66446008)(8676002)(66476007)(66946007)(91956017)(52536014)(5660300002)(66556008)(4326008)(64756008)(316002)(6916009)(41300700001)(86362001)(54906003)(55016003)(2906002)(33656002)(8936002)(83380400001)(38070700005)(122000001)(38100700002)(966005)(7696005)(9686003)(6506007)(53546011)(186003)(478600001)(71200400001)(66899012);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_VI1PR08MB5325CC44E0458DC8148ED695FF529VI1PR08MB5325eurp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DU2PR08MB7343 Original-Authentication-Results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com; X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStripped: AM7EUR03FT035.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id-Prvs: 1cd7bc1c-c7da-4288-d834-08da9faf041b X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:63.35.35.123;CTRY:IE;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:CAL;SFV:NSPM;H:64aa7808-outbound-1.mta.getcheckrecipient.com;PTR:ec2-63-35-35-123.eu-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230022)(4636009)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(396003)(346002)(451199015)(46966006)(40470700004)(36840700001)(33656002)(66899012)(54906003)(966005)(4326008)(70206006)(70586007)(478600001)(8676002)(316002)(5660300002)(41300700001)(8936002)(6862004)(52536014)(53546011)(26005)(6506007)(7696005)(30864003)(356005)(81166007)(47076005)(83380400001)(55016003)(82310400005)(2906002)(9686003)(186003)(336012)(36860700001)(40460700003)(40480700001)(86362001)(82740400003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: arm.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Sep 2022 11:05:39.2359 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1a72b761-b7d8-4c68-f080-08da9faf0bd7 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: f34e5979-57d9-4aaa-ad4d-b122a662184d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=f34e5979-57d9-4aaa-ad4d-b122a662184d;Ip=[63.35.35.123];Helo=[64aa7808-outbound-1.mta.getcheckrecipient.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM7EUR03FT035.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PAXPR08MB6333 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FORGED_SPF_HELO,GIT_PATCH_0,HTML_MESSAGE,KAM_DMARC_NONE,KAM_LOTSOFHASH,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,TXREP,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --_000_VI1PR08MB5325CC44E0458DC8148ED695FF529VI1PR08MB5325eurp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > This pattern occurs more than 120,000 times in SPECCPU 2017 and so is q= uite common. > How does this help a target? So the idea is to communicate that only the bottom bit of the value is rele= vant and not the entire value itself. > Why does RTL nonzerop bits not recover thisinformation and the desired op= timization done later during combinefor example? I'm not sure it works here. We (AArch64) don't have QImode integer register= s, so our apcs says that the top bits of the 32-bit registers it's passed i= n are undefined. We have to zero extend the value first if we really want it as an 8-bit val= ue. So the problem is if you e.g. Pass a boolean as an argument of a functi= on I don't think nonzero bits will return anything useful. > Why's a SImode compare not OK if there's no QImode compare? The mode then becomes irrelevant because we're telling the backend that onl= y a single bit matters. And we have instructions to test and branch on the = value of a single bit. See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-S= eptember/602090.html for the testcases > We have undocumented addcc, negcc, etc. patterns, should we have aandcc p= attern for this indicating support for andcc + jump as opposedto cmpcc + ju= mp? This could work yeah. I didn't know these existed. > So - what's the target and what's a testcase? See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/602090.html :) Thanks, Tamar ________________________________ From: Richard Biener Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:35 AM To: Tamar Christina Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org ; nd ; jef= freyalaw@gmail.com ; Richard Sandiford Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: RFC: On expansion of conditional branch= es, give hint if argument is a truth type to backend On Fri, 23 Sep 2022, Tamar Christina wrote: > Hi All, > > This is an RFC to figure out how to deal with targets that don't have nat= ive > comparisons against QImode values. > > Booleans, at least in C99 and higher are 0-1 valued. This means that we = only > really need to test a single bit. However in RTL we no longer have this > information available and just have an SImode value (due to the promotion= of > QImode to SImode). > > This RFC fixes it by emitting an explicit & 1 during the expansion of the > conditional branch. > > However it's unlikely that we want to do this unconditionally. Most targ= ets > I've tested seem to have harmless code changes, like x86 changes from tes= tb to > andl, $1. > > So I have two questions: > > 1. Should I limit this behind a target macro? Or should I just leave it f= or all > targets and deal with the fallout. > 2. How can I tell whether the C99 0-1 values bools are being used or the = older > 0, non-0 variant? > > Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues. > However there are some benign codegen changes on x86, testb changed to an= dl $1. > > This pattern occurs more than 120,000 times in SPECCPU 2017 and so is qui= te common. How does this help a target? Why does RTL nonzerop bits not recover this information and the desired optimization done later during combine for example? Why's a SImode compare not OK if there's no QImode compare? We have undocumented addcc, negcc, etc. patterns, should we have a andcc pattern for this indicating support for andcc + jump as opposed to cmpcc + jump? So - what's the target and what's a testcase? Thanks, Richard. > Thanks, > Tamar > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * tree.h (tree_zero_one_valued_p): New. > * dojump.cc (do_jump): Add & 1 if truth type. > > --- inline copy of patch -- > diff --git a/gcc/dojump.cc b/gcc/dojump.cc > index 2af0cd1aca3b6af13d5d8799094ee93f18022296..8eaf1be49cd12298e61c6946a= e79ca9de6197864 100644 > --- a/gcc/dojump.cc > +++ b/gcc/dojump.cc > @@ -605,7 +605,17 @@ do_jump (tree exp, rtx_code_label *if_false_label, > /* Fall through and generate the normal code. */ > default: > normal: > - temp =3D expand_normal (exp); > + tree cmp =3D exp; > + /* If the expression is a truth type then explicitly generate an &= 1 > + to indicate to the target that it's a zero-one values type. This > + allows the target to further optimize the comparison should it > + choose to. */ > + if (tree_zero_one_valued_p (exp)) > + { > + type =3D TREE_TYPE (exp); > + cmp =3D build2 (BIT_AND_EXPR, type, exp, build_int_cstu (type, 1)= ); > + } > + temp =3D expand_normal (cmp); > do_pending_stack_adjust (); > /* The RTL optimizers prefer comparisons against pseudos. */ > if (GET_CODE (temp) =3D=3D SUBREG) > diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h > index 8f8a9660c9e0605eb516de194640b8c1b531b798..be3d2dee82f692e81082cf21c= 878c10f9fe9e1f1 100644 > --- a/gcc/tree.h > +++ b/gcc/tree.h > @@ -4690,6 +4690,7 @@ extern tree signed_or_unsigned_type_for (int, tree); > extern tree signed_type_for (tree); > extern tree unsigned_type_for (tree); > extern bool is_truth_type_for (tree, tree); > +extern bool tree_zero_one_valued_p (tree); > extern tree truth_type_for (tree); > extern tree build_pointer_type_for_mode (tree, machine_mode, bool); > extern tree build_pointer_type (tree); > > > > > -- Richard Biener SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg) --_000_VI1PR08MB5325CC44E0458DC8148ED695FF529VI1PR08MB5325eurp_--