From: Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, "jlaw@ventanamicro.com" <jlaw@ventanamicro.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 9/21]middle-end: implement vectorizable_early_exit for codegen of exit code
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 13:45:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR08MB5325DB133AC037DD8FF4BB90FF8AA@VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <prss2nrs-28s5-90n2-nron-qs04s8qpq364@fhfr.qr>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 10:28 AM
> To: Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd <nd@arm.com>; jlaw@ventanamicro.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 9/21]middle-end: implement vectorizable_early_exit for
> codegen of exit code
>
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2023, Tamar Christina wrote:
>
> > > --param vect-partial-vector-usage=2 would, no?
> > >
> > I.. didn't even know it went to 2!
> >
> > > > In principal I suppose I could mask the individual stmts, that should handle
> the
> > > future case when
> > > > This is relaxed to supposed non-fix length buffers?
> > >
> > > Well, it looks wrong - either put in an assert that we start with a
> > > single stmt or assert !masked_loop_p instead? Better ICE than
> > > generate wrong code.
> > >
> > > That said, I think you need to apply the masking on the original
> > > stmts[], before reducing them, no?
> >
> > Yeah, I've done so now. For simplicity I've just kept the final masking always as
> well
> > and just leave it up to the optimizers to drop it when it's superfluous.
> >
> > Simple testcase:
> >
> > #ifndef N
> > #define N 837
> > #endif
> > float vect_a[N];
> > unsigned vect_b[N];
> >
> > unsigned test4(double x)
> > {
> > unsigned ret = 0;
> > for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
> > {
> > if (vect_a[i] > x)
> > break;
> > vect_a[i] = x;
> >
> > }
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > Looks good now. After this one there's only one patch left, the dependency
> analysis.
> > I'm almost done with the cleanup/respin, but want to take the weekend to
> double check and will post it first thing Monday morning.
> >
> > Did you want to see the testsuite changes as well again? I've basically just added
> the right dg-requires-effective and add-options etc.
>
> Yes please.
>
> > Thanks for all the reviews!
> >
> > Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
> >
> > Ok for master?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tamar
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * tree-vect-patterns.cc (vect_init_pattern_stmt): Support gconds.
> > (check_bool_pattern, adjust_bool_pattern, adjust_bool_stmts,
> > vect_recog_bool_pattern, sort_after_uid): Support gconds type analysis.
> > * tree-vect-stmts.cc (vectorizable_comparison_1): Support stmts without
> > lhs.
> > (vectorizable_early_exit): New.
> > (vect_analyze_stmt, vect_transform_stmt): Use it.
> > (vect_is_simple_use, vect_get_vector_types_for_stmt): Support gcond.
> >
> >
> > --- inline copy of patch ---
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
> > index
> 7debe7f0731673cd1bf25cd39d55e23990a73d0e..8865cde9f3481a474d31848
> ae12523576d29744d 100644
> > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
> > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ vect_init_pattern_stmt (vec_info *vinfo, gimple
> *pattern_stmt,
> > if (!STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (pattern_stmt_info))
> > {
> > gcc_assert (!vectype
> > + || is_a <gcond *> (pattern_stmt)
> > || (VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (vectype)
> > == vect_use_mask_type_p (orig_stmt_info)));
> > STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (pattern_stmt_info) = vectype;
> > @@ -5210,19 +5211,28 @@ vect_recog_mixed_size_cond_pattern (vec_info
> *vinfo,
> > true if bool VAR can and should be optimized that way. Assume it shouldn't
> > in case it's a result of a comparison which can be directly vectorized into
> > a vector comparison. Fills in STMTS with all stmts visited during the
> > - walk. */
> > + walk. if ANALYZE_ONLY then only analyze the booleans but do not perform
> any
> > + codegen associated with the boolean condition. */
> >
> > static bool
> > -check_bool_pattern (tree var, vec_info *vinfo, hash_set<gimple *> &stmts)
> > +check_bool_pattern (tree var, vec_info *vinfo, hash_set<gimple *> &stmts,
> > + bool analyze_only)
> > {
> > tree rhs1;
> > enum tree_code rhs_code;
> > + gassign *def_stmt = NULL;
> >
> > stmt_vec_info def_stmt_info = vect_get_internal_def (vinfo, var);
> > - if (!def_stmt_info)
> > + if (!def_stmt_info && !analyze_only)
> > return false;
> > + else if (!def_stmt_info)
> > + /* If we're a only analyzing we won't be codegen-ing the statements and are
> > + only after if the types match. In that case we can accept loop invariant
> > + values. */
> > + def_stmt = dyn_cast <gassign *> (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (var));
> > + else
> > + def_stmt = dyn_cast <gassign *> (def_stmt_info->stmt);
> >
>
> Hmm, but we're visiting them then? I wonder how you get along
> without doing adjustmens on the uses if you consider
>
> _1 = a < b;
> _2 = c != d;
> _3 = _1 | _2;
> if (_3 != 0)
> exit loop;
>
> thus a combined condition like
>
> if (a < b || c != d)
>
> that we if-converted. We need to recognize that _1, _2 and _3 have
> mask uses and thus possibly adjust them.
>
> What bad happens if you drop 'analyze_only'? We're not really
> rewriting anything there.
You mean drop it only in the above? We then fail to update the type for
the gcond. So in certain circumstances like with
int a, c, d;
short b;
int
main ()
{
int e[1];
for (; b < 2; b++)
{
a = 0;
if (b == 28378)
a = e[b];
if (!(d || b))
for (; c;)
;
}
return 0;
}
Unless we walk the statements regardless of whether they come from inside the loop or not.
>
> > - gassign *def_stmt = dyn_cast <gassign *> (def_stmt_info->stmt);
> > if (!def_stmt)
> > return false;
> >
> > @@ -5234,27 +5244,28 @@ check_bool_pattern (tree var, vec_info *vinfo,
> hash_set<gimple *> &stmts)
> > switch (rhs_code)
> > {
> > case SSA_NAME:
> > - if (! check_bool_pattern (rhs1, vinfo, stmts))
> > + if (! check_bool_pattern (rhs1, vinfo, stmts, analyze_only))
> > return false;
> > break;
> >
> > CASE_CONVERT:
> > if (!VECT_SCALAR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (rhs1)))
> > return false;
> > - if (! check_bool_pattern (rhs1, vinfo, stmts))
> > + if (! check_bool_pattern (rhs1, vinfo, stmts, analyze_only))
> > return false;
> > break;
> >
> > case BIT_NOT_EXPR:
> > - if (! check_bool_pattern (rhs1, vinfo, stmts))
> > + if (! check_bool_pattern (rhs1, vinfo, stmts, analyze_only))
> > return false;
> > break;
> >
> > case BIT_AND_EXPR:
> > case BIT_IOR_EXPR:
> > case BIT_XOR_EXPR:
> > - if (! check_bool_pattern (rhs1, vinfo, stmts)
> > - || ! check_bool_pattern (gimple_assign_rhs2 (def_stmt), vinfo, stmts))
> > + if (! check_bool_pattern (rhs1, vinfo, stmts, analyze_only)
> > + || ! check_bool_pattern (gimple_assign_rhs2 (def_stmt), vinfo, stmts,
> > + analyze_only))
> > return false;
> > break;
> >
> > @@ -5275,6 +5286,7 @@ check_bool_pattern (tree var, vec_info *vinfo,
> hash_set<gimple *> &stmts)
> > tree mask_type = get_mask_type_for_scalar_type (vinfo,
> > TREE_TYPE (rhs1));
> > if (mask_type
> > + && !analyze_only
> > && expand_vec_cmp_expr_p (comp_vectype, mask_type, rhs_code))
> > return false;
> >
> > @@ -5289,7 +5301,8 @@ check_bool_pattern (tree var, vec_info *vinfo,
> hash_set<gimple *> &stmts)
> > }
> > else
> > vecitype = comp_vectype;
> > - if (! expand_vec_cond_expr_p (vecitype, comp_vectype, rhs_code))
> > + if (!analyze_only
> > + && !expand_vec_cond_expr_p (vecitype, comp_vectype, rhs_code))
> > return false;
> > }
> > else
> > @@ -5324,11 +5337,13 @@ adjust_bool_pattern_cast (vec_info *vinfo,
> > VAR is an SSA_NAME that should be transformed from bool to a wider integer
> > type, OUT_TYPE is the desired final integer type of the whole pattern.
> > STMT_INFO is the info of the pattern root and is where pattern stmts should
> > - be associated with. DEFS is a map of pattern defs. */
> > + be associated with. DEFS is a map of pattern defs. If TYPE_ONLY then don't
> > + create new pattern statements and instead only fill LAST_STMT and DEFS. */
> >
> > static void
> > adjust_bool_pattern (vec_info *vinfo, tree var, tree out_type,
> > - stmt_vec_info stmt_info, hash_map <tree, tree> &defs)
> > + stmt_vec_info stmt_info, hash_map <tree, tree> &defs,
> > + gimple *&last_stmt, bool type_only)
> > {
> > gimple *stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (var);
> > enum tree_code rhs_code, def_rhs_code;
> > @@ -5492,28 +5507,38 @@ adjust_bool_pattern (vec_info *vinfo, tree var, tree
> out_type,
> > }
> >
> > gimple_set_location (pattern_stmt, loc);
> > - append_pattern_def_seq (vinfo, stmt_info, pattern_stmt,
> > - get_vectype_for_scalar_type (vinfo, itype));
> > + if (!type_only)
> > + append_pattern_def_seq (vinfo, stmt_info, pattern_stmt,
> > + get_vectype_for_scalar_type (vinfo, itype));
> > + last_stmt = pattern_stmt;
> > defs.put (var, gimple_assign_lhs (pattern_stmt));
> > }
> >
> > -/* Comparison function to qsort a vector of gimple stmts after UID. */
> > +/* Comparison function to qsort a vector of gimple stmts after BB and UID.
> > + the def of one statement can be in an earlier block than the use, so if
> > + the BB are different, first compare by BB. */
> >
> > static int
> > sort_after_uid (const void *p1, const void *p2)
> > {
> > const gimple *stmt1 = *(const gimple * const *)p1;
> > const gimple *stmt2 = *(const gimple * const *)p2;
> > + if (gimple_bb (stmt1)->index != gimple_bb (stmt2)->index)
> > + return gimple_bb (stmt1)->index - gimple_bb (stmt2)->index;
> > +
>
> is this because you eventually get out-of-loop stmts (without UID)?
>
No the problem I was having is that with an early exit the statement of
one branch of the compare can be in a different BB than the other.
The testcase specifically was this:
int a, c, d;
short b;
int
main ()
{
int e[1];
for (; b < 2; b++)
{
a = 0;
if (b == 28378)
a = e[b];
if (!(d || b))
for (; c;)
;
}
return 0;
}
Without debug info it happened to work:
>>> p gimple_uid (bool_stmts[0])
$1 = 3
>>> p gimple_uid (bool_stmts[1])
$2 = 3
>>> p gimple_uid (bool_stmts[2])
$3 = 4
The first two statements got the same uid, but are in different BB in the loop.
When we add debug, it looks like 1 bb got more debug state than the other:
>>> p gimple_uid (bool_stmts[0])
$1 = 3
>>> p gimple_uid (bool_stmts[1])
$2 = 4
>>> p gimple_uid (bool_stmts[2])
$3 = 6
That last statement, which now has a UID of 6 used to be 3.
> > return gimple_uid (stmt1) - gimple_uid (stmt2);
> > }
> >
> > /* Create pattern stmts for all stmts participating in the bool pattern
> > specified by BOOL_STMT_SET and its root STMT_INFO with the desired type
> > - OUT_TYPE. Return the def of the pattern root. */
> > + OUT_TYPE. Return the def of the pattern root. If TYPE_ONLY the new
> > + statements are not emitted as pattern statements and the tree returned is
> > + only useful for type queries. */
> >
> > static tree
> > adjust_bool_stmts (vec_info *vinfo, hash_set <gimple *> &bool_stmt_set,
> > - tree out_type, stmt_vec_info stmt_info)
> > + tree out_type, stmt_vec_info stmt_info,
> > + bool type_only = false)
> > {
> > /* Gather original stmts in the bool pattern in their order of appearance
> > in the IL. */
> > @@ -5523,16 +5548,16 @@ adjust_bool_stmts (vec_info *vinfo, hash_set
> <gimple *> &bool_stmt_set,
> > bool_stmts.quick_push (*i);
> > bool_stmts.qsort (sort_after_uid);
> >
> > + gimple *last_stmt = NULL;
> > +
> > /* Now process them in that order, producing pattern stmts. */
> > hash_map <tree, tree> defs;
> > - for (unsigned i = 0; i < bool_stmts.length (); ++i)
> > - adjust_bool_pattern (vinfo, gimple_assign_lhs (bool_stmts[i]),
> > - out_type, stmt_info, defs);
> > + for (auto bool_stmt : bool_stmts)
> > + adjust_bool_pattern (vinfo, gimple_assign_lhs (bool_stmt),
> > + out_type, stmt_info, defs, last_stmt, type_only);
> >
> > /* Pop the last pattern seq stmt and install it as pattern root for STMT. */
> > - gimple *pattern_stmt
> > - = gimple_seq_last_stmt (STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ (stmt_info));
> > - return gimple_assign_lhs (pattern_stmt);
> > + return gimple_assign_lhs (last_stmt);
> > }
> >
> > /* Return the proper type for converting bool VAR into
> > @@ -5608,13 +5633,27 @@ vect_recog_bool_pattern (vec_info *vinfo,
> > enum tree_code rhs_code;
> > tree var, lhs, rhs, vectype;
> > gimple *pattern_stmt;
> > -
> > - if (!is_gimple_assign (last_stmt))
> > + gcond* cond = NULL;
> > + if (!is_gimple_assign (last_stmt)
> > + && !(cond = dyn_cast <gcond *> (last_stmt)))
> > return NULL;
> >
> > - var = gimple_assign_rhs1 (last_stmt);
> > - lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (last_stmt);
> > - rhs_code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (last_stmt);
> > + loop_vec_info loop_vinfo = dyn_cast <loop_vec_info> (vinfo);
> > + if (is_gimple_assign (last_stmt))
> > + {
> > + var = gimple_assign_rhs1 (last_stmt);
> > + lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (last_stmt);
> > + rhs_code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (last_stmt);
> > + }
> > + else if (loop_vinfo && LOOP_VINFO_EARLY_BREAKS (loop_vinfo))
> > + {
> > + /* If not multiple exits, and loop vectorization don't bother analyzing
> > + the gcond as we don't support SLP today. */
> > + lhs = var = gimple_cond_lhs (last_stmt);
> > + rhs_code = gimple_cond_code (last_stmt);
> > + }
> > + else
> > + return NULL;
> >
> > if (rhs_code == VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR)
> > var = TREE_OPERAND (var, 0);
> > @@ -5632,7 +5671,7 @@ vect_recog_bool_pattern (vec_info *vinfo,
> > return NULL;
> > vectype = get_vectype_for_scalar_type (vinfo, TREE_TYPE (lhs));
> >
> > - if (check_bool_pattern (var, vinfo, bool_stmts))
> > + if (check_bool_pattern (var, vinfo, bool_stmts, false))
> > {
> > rhs = adjust_bool_stmts (vinfo, bool_stmts,
> > TREE_TYPE (lhs), stmt_vinfo);
> > @@ -5680,7 +5719,7 @@ vect_recog_bool_pattern (vec_info *vinfo,
> >
> > return pattern_stmt;
> > }
> > - else if (rhs_code == COND_EXPR
> > + else if ((rhs_code == COND_EXPR || cond)
> > && TREE_CODE (var) == SSA_NAME)
> > {
> > vectype = get_vectype_for_scalar_type (vinfo, TREE_TYPE (lhs));
> > @@ -5700,18 +5739,31 @@ vect_recog_bool_pattern (vec_info *vinfo,
> > if (get_vectype_for_scalar_type (vinfo, type) == NULL_TREE)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > - if (check_bool_pattern (var, vinfo, bool_stmts))
> > - var = adjust_bool_stmts (vinfo, bool_stmts, type, stmt_vinfo);
> > + if (check_bool_pattern (var, vinfo, bool_stmts, cond))
> > + var = adjust_bool_stmts (vinfo, bool_stmts, type, stmt_vinfo, cond);
> > else if (integer_type_for_mask (var, vinfo))
> > return NULL;
> >
> > - lhs = vect_recog_temp_ssa_var (TREE_TYPE (lhs), NULL);
> > - pattern_stmt
> > - = gimple_build_assign (lhs, COND_EXPR,
> > - build2 (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
> > - var, build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (var), 0)),
> > - gimple_assign_rhs2 (last_stmt),
> > - gimple_assign_rhs3 (last_stmt));
> > + if (!cond)
> > + {
> > + lhs = vect_recog_temp_ssa_var (TREE_TYPE (lhs), NULL);
> > + pattern_stmt
> > + = gimple_build_assign (lhs, COND_EXPR,
> > + build2 (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, var,
> > + build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (var), 0)),
> > + gimple_assign_rhs2 (last_stmt),
> > + gimple_assign_rhs3 (last_stmt));
> > + }
> > + else
> > + {
> > + pattern_stmt
> > + = gimple_build_cond (gimple_cond_code (cond),
> > + gimple_cond_lhs (cond), gimple_cond_rhs (cond),
> > + gimple_cond_true_label (cond),
> > + gimple_cond_false_label (cond));
> > + vectype = get_vectype_for_scalar_type (vinfo, TREE_TYPE (var));
> > + vectype = truth_type_for (vectype);
> > + }
> > *type_out = vectype;
> > vect_pattern_detected ("vect_recog_bool_pattern", last_stmt);
> >
>
> So this is also quite odd. You're hooking into COND_EXPR handling
> but only look at the LHS of the GIMPLE_COND compare.
>
Hmm, not sure I follow, GIMPLE_CONDs don't have an LHS no? we look at the LHS
For the COND_EXPR but a GCOND we just recreate the statement and set vectype
based on the updated var. I guess this is related to:
> that we if-converted. We need to recognize that _1, _2 and _3 have
> mask uses and thus possibly adjust them.
Which I did think about somewhat, so what you're saying is that I need to create
a new GIMPLE_COND here with an NE to 0 compare against var like the COND_EXPR
case?
> Please refactor the changes to separate the GIMPLE_COND path
> completely.
>
Ok, then it seems better to make two patterns?
> Is there test coverage for such "complex" condition? I think
> you'll need adjustments to vect_recog_mask_conversion_pattern
> as well similar as to how COND_EXPR is handled there.
Yes, the existing testsuite has many cases which fail, including gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20150611-1.c
Cheers,
Tamar
>
> > @@ -5725,7 +5777,7 @@ vect_recog_bool_pattern (vec_info *vinfo,
> > if (!vectype || !VECTOR_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (vectype)))
> > return NULL;
> >
> > - if (check_bool_pattern (var, vinfo, bool_stmts))
> > + if (check_bool_pattern (var, vinfo, bool_stmts, false))
> > rhs = adjust_bool_stmts (vinfo, bool_stmts,
> > TREE_TYPE (vectype), stmt_vinfo);
> > else
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> > index
> 582c5e678fad802d6e76300fe3c939b9f2978f17..e9116d184149826ba436b0f5
> 62721c140d586c94 100644
> > --- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> > @@ -12489,7 +12489,7 @@ vectorizable_comparison_1 (vec_info *vinfo, tree
> vectype,
> > vec<tree> vec_oprnds0 = vNULL;
> > vec<tree> vec_oprnds1 = vNULL;
> > tree mask_type;
> > - tree mask;
> > + tree mask = NULL_TREE;
> >
> > if (!STMT_VINFO_RELEVANT_P (stmt_info) && !bb_vinfo)
> > return false;
> > @@ -12629,8 +12629,9 @@ vectorizable_comparison_1 (vec_info *vinfo, tree
> vectype,
> > /* Transform. */
> >
> > /* Handle def. */
> > - lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (STMT_VINFO_STMT (stmt_info));
> > - mask = vect_create_destination_var (lhs, mask_type);
> > + lhs = gimple_get_lhs (STMT_VINFO_STMT (stmt_info));
> > + if (lhs)
> > + mask = vect_create_destination_var (lhs, mask_type);
> >
> > vect_get_vec_defs (vinfo, stmt_info, slp_node, ncopies,
> > rhs1, &vec_oprnds0, vectype,
> > @@ -12644,7 +12645,10 @@ vectorizable_comparison_1 (vec_info *vinfo, tree
> vectype,
> > gimple *new_stmt;
> > vec_rhs2 = vec_oprnds1[i];
> >
> > - new_temp = make_ssa_name (mask);
> > + if (lhs)
> > + new_temp = make_ssa_name (mask);
> > + else
> > + new_temp = make_temp_ssa_name (mask_type, NULL, "cmp");
> > if (bitop1 == NOP_EXPR)
> > {
> > new_stmt = gimple_build_assign (new_temp, code,
> > @@ -12723,6 +12727,184 @@ vectorizable_comparison (vec_info *vinfo,
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +/* Check to see if the current early break given in STMT_INFO is valid for
> > + vectorization. */
> > +
> > +static bool
> > +vectorizable_early_exit (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info,
> > + gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, gimple **vec_stmt,
> > + slp_tree slp_node, stmt_vector_for_cost *cost_vec)
> > +{
> > + loop_vec_info loop_vinfo = dyn_cast <loop_vec_info> (vinfo);
> > + if (!loop_vinfo
> > + || !is_a <gcond *> (STMT_VINFO_STMT (stmt_info)))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if (STMT_VINFO_DEF_TYPE (stmt_info) != vect_condition_def)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if (!STMT_VINFO_RELEVANT_P (stmt_info))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + auto code = gimple_cond_code (STMT_VINFO_STMT (stmt_info));
> > + tree vectype = STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (stmt_info);
> > + gcc_assert (vectype);
> > +
> > + tree vectype_op0 = NULL_TREE;
> > + slp_tree slp_op0;
> > + tree op0;
> > + enum vect_def_type dt0;
> > + if (!vect_is_simple_use (vinfo, stmt_info, slp_node, 0, &op0, &slp_op0, &dt0,
> > + &vectype_op0))
> > + {
> > + if (dump_enabled_p ())
> > + dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
> > + "use not simple.\n");
> > + return false;
> > + }
>
> I think you rely on patterns transforming this into canonical form
> mask != 0, so I suggest to check this here.
>
> > + machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (vectype);
> > + int ncopies;
> > +
> > + if (slp_node)
> > + ncopies = 1;
> > + else
> > + ncopies = vect_get_num_copies (loop_vinfo, vectype);
> > +
> > + vec_loop_masks *masks = &LOOP_VINFO_MASKS (loop_vinfo);
> > + bool masked_loop_p = LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo);
> > +
> > + /* Analyze only. */
> > + if (!vec_stmt)
> > + {
> > + if (direct_optab_handler (cbranch_optab, mode) == CODE_FOR_nothing)
> > + {
> > + if (dump_enabled_p ())
> > + dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
> > + "can't vectorize early exit because the "
> > + "target doesn't support flag setting vector "
> > + "comparisons.\n");
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (ncopies > 1
>
> Also required for vec_num > 1 with SLP
> (SLP_TREE_NUMBER_OF_VEC_STMTS)
>
> > + && direct_optab_handler (ior_optab, mode) == CODE_FOR_nothing)
> > + {
> > + if (dump_enabled_p ())
> > + dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
> > + "can't vectorize early exit because the "
> > + "target does not support boolean vector OR for "
> > + "type %T.\n", vectype);
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!vectorizable_comparison_1 (vinfo, vectype, stmt_info, code, gsi,
> > + vec_stmt, slp_node, cost_vec))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if (LOOP_VINFO_CAN_USE_PARTIAL_VECTORS_P (loop_vinfo))
> > + {
> > + if (direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_VCOND_MASK_LEN, vectype,
> > + OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED))
> > + return false;
> > + else
> > + vect_record_loop_mask (loop_vinfo, masks, ncopies, vectype, NULL);
> > + }
> > +
> > +
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Tranform. */
> > +
> > + tree new_temp = NULL_TREE;
> > + gimple *new_stmt = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (dump_enabled_p ())
> > + dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location, "transform early-exit.\n");
> > +
> > + if (!vectorizable_comparison_1 (vinfo, vectype, stmt_info, code, gsi,
> > + vec_stmt, slp_node, cost_vec))
> > + gcc_unreachable ();
> > +
> > + gimple *stmt = STMT_VINFO_STMT (stmt_info);
> > + basic_block cond_bb = gimple_bb (stmt);
> > + gimple_stmt_iterator cond_gsi = gsi_last_bb (cond_bb);
> > +
> > + auto_vec<tree> stmts;
> > +
> > + tree mask = NULL_TREE;
> > + if (masked_loop_p)
> > + mask = vect_get_loop_mask (loop_vinfo, gsi, masks, ncopies, vectype, 0);
> > +
> > + if (slp_node)
> > + stmts.safe_splice (SLP_TREE_VEC_DEFS (slp_node));
> > + else
> > + {
> > + auto vec_stmts = STMT_VINFO_VEC_STMTS (stmt_info);
> > + stmts.reserve_exact (vec_stmts.length ());
> > + for (auto stmt : vec_stmts)
> > + stmts.quick_push (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt));
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Determine if we need to reduce the final value. */
> > + if (stmts.length () > 1)
> > + {
> > + /* We build the reductions in a way to maintain as much parallelism as
> > + possible. */
> > + auto_vec<tree> workset (stmts.length ());
> > +
> > + /* Mask the statements as we queue them up. */
> > + if (masked_loop_p)
> > + for (auto stmt : stmts)
> > + workset.quick_push (prepare_vec_mask (loop_vinfo, TREE_TYPE (mask),
> > + mask, stmt, &cond_gsi));
>
> I think this still uses the wrong mask, you need to use
>
> vect_get_loop_mask (loop_vinfo, gsi, masks, ncopies, vectype, <cnt>)
>
> replacing <cnt> with the vector def index to mask I think. For this
> reason keeping the "final" mask below is also wrong.
>
> Or am I missing something?
>
> > + else
> > + workset.splice (stmts);
> > +
> > + while (workset.length () > 1)
> > + {
> > + new_temp = make_temp_ssa_name (vectype, NULL, "vexit_reduc");
> > + tree arg0 = workset.pop ();
> > + tree arg1 = workset.pop ();
> > + new_stmt = gimple_build_assign (new_temp, BIT_IOR_EXPR, arg0, arg1);
> > + vect_finish_stmt_generation (loop_vinfo, stmt_info, new_stmt,
> > + &cond_gsi);
> > + workset.quick_insert (0, new_temp);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + else
> > + new_temp = stmts[0];
> > +
> > + gcc_assert (new_temp);
> > +
> > + tree cond = new_temp;
> > + /* If we have multiple statements after reduction we should check all the
> > + lanes and treat it as a full vector. */
> > + if (masked_loop_p)
> > + cond = prepare_vec_mask (loop_vinfo, TREE_TYPE (mask), mask, cond,
> > + &cond_gsi);
>
> so just do this in the else path above
>
> Otherwise looks OK.
>
> Richard.
>
> > + /* Now build the new conditional. Pattern gimple_conds get dropped during
> > + codegen so we must replace the original insn. */
> > + stmt = STMT_VINFO_STMT (vect_orig_stmt (stmt_info));
> > + gcond *cond_stmt = as_a <gcond *>(stmt);
> > + gimple_cond_set_condition (cond_stmt, NE_EXPR, cond,
> > + build_zero_cst (vectype));
> > + update_stmt (stmt);
> > +
> > + if (slp_node)
> > + SLP_TREE_VEC_DEFS (slp_node).truncate (0);
> > + else
> > + STMT_VINFO_VEC_STMTS (stmt_info).truncate (0);
> > +
> > +
> > + if (!slp_node)
> > + *vec_stmt = stmt;
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* If SLP_NODE is nonnull, return true if vectorizable_live_operation
> > can handle all live statements in the node. Otherwise return true
> > if STMT_INFO is not live or if vectorizable_live_operation can handle it.
> > @@ -12949,7 +13131,9 @@ vect_analyze_stmt (vec_info *vinfo,
> > || vectorizable_lc_phi (as_a <loop_vec_info> (vinfo),
> > stmt_info, NULL, node)
> > || vectorizable_recurr (as_a <loop_vec_info> (vinfo),
> > - stmt_info, NULL, node, cost_vec));
> > + stmt_info, NULL, node, cost_vec)
> > + || vectorizable_early_exit (vinfo, stmt_info, NULL, NULL, node,
> > + cost_vec));
> > else
> > {
> > if (bb_vinfo)
> > @@ -12972,7 +13156,10 @@ vect_analyze_stmt (vec_info *vinfo,
> > NULL, NULL, node, cost_vec)
> > || vectorizable_comparison (vinfo, stmt_info, NULL, NULL, node,
> > cost_vec)
> > - || vectorizable_phi (vinfo, stmt_info, NULL, node, cost_vec));
> > + || vectorizable_phi (vinfo, stmt_info, NULL, node, cost_vec)
> > + || vectorizable_early_exit (vinfo, stmt_info, NULL, NULL, node,
> > + cost_vec));
> > +
> > }
> >
> > if (node)
> > @@ -13131,6 +13318,12 @@ vect_transform_stmt (vec_info *vinfo,
> > gcc_assert (done);
> > break;
> >
> > + case loop_exit_ctrl_vec_info_type:
> > + done = vectorizable_early_exit (vinfo, stmt_info, gsi, &vec_stmt,
> > + slp_node, NULL);
> > + gcc_assert (done);
> > + break;
> > +
> > default:
> > if (!STMT_VINFO_LIVE_P (stmt_info))
> > {
> > @@ -14321,10 +14514,19 @@ vect_get_vector_types_for_stmt (vec_info
> *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info,
> > }
> > else
> > {
> > + gcond *cond = NULL;
> > if (data_reference *dr = STMT_VINFO_DATA_REF (stmt_info))
> > scalar_type = TREE_TYPE (DR_REF (dr));
> > else if (gimple_call_internal_p (stmt, IFN_MASK_STORE))
> > scalar_type = TREE_TYPE (gimple_call_arg (stmt, 3));
> > + else if ((cond = dyn_cast <gcond *> (stmt)))
> > + {
> > + /* We can't convert the scalar type to boolean yet, since booleans have a
> > + single bit precision and we need the vector boolean to be a
> > + representation of the integer mask. So set the correct integer type and
> > + convert to boolean vector once we have a vectype. */
> > + scalar_type = TREE_TYPE (gimple_cond_lhs (cond));
> > + }
> > else
> > scalar_type = TREE_TYPE (gimple_get_lhs (stmt));
> >
> > @@ -14339,12 +14541,18 @@ vect_get_vector_types_for_stmt (vec_info
> *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info,
> > "get vectype for scalar type: %T\n", scalar_type);
> > }
> > vectype = get_vectype_for_scalar_type (vinfo, scalar_type, group_size);
> > +
> > if (!vectype)
> > return opt_result::failure_at (stmt,
> > "not vectorized:"
> > " unsupported data-type %T\n",
> > scalar_type);
> >
> > + /* If we were a gcond, convert the resulting type to a vector boolean type
> now
> > + that we have the correct integer mask type. */
> > + if (cond)
> > + vectype = truth_type_for (vectype);
> > +
> > if (dump_enabled_p ())
> > dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location, "vectype: %T\n", vectype);
> > }
> >
>
> --
> Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
> Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
> GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 202+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-28 13:40 [PATCH v5 0/19] Support early break/return auto-vectorization Tamar Christina
2023-06-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/19]middle-end ifcvt: Support bitfield lowering of multiple-exit loops Tamar Christina
2023-07-04 11:29 ` Richard Biener
2023-06-28 13:41 ` [PATCH 2/19][front-end] C/C++ front-end: add pragma GCC novector Tamar Christina
2023-06-29 22:17 ` Jason Merrill
2023-06-30 16:18 ` Tamar Christina
2023-06-30 16:44 ` Jason Merrill
2023-06-28 13:42 ` [PATCH 3/19]middle-end clean up vect testsuite using pragma novector Tamar Christina
2023-06-28 13:54 ` Tamar Christina
2023-07-04 11:31 ` Richard Biener
2023-06-28 13:43 ` [PATCH 4/19]middle-end: Fix scale_loop_frequencies segfault on multiple-exits Tamar Christina
2023-07-04 11:52 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-04 14:57 ` Jan Hubicka
2023-07-06 14:34 ` Jan Hubicka
2023-07-07 5:59 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-07 12:20 ` Jan Hubicka
2023-07-07 12:27 ` Tamar Christina
2023-07-07 14:10 ` Jan Hubicka
2023-07-10 7:07 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-10 8:33 ` Jan Hubicka
2023-07-10 9:24 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-10 9:23 ` Jan Hubicka
2023-07-10 9:29 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-11 9:28 ` Jan Hubicka
2023-07-11 10:31 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-11 12:40 ` Jan Hubicka
2023-07-11 13:04 ` Richard Biener
2023-06-28 13:43 ` [PATCH 5/19]middle-end: Enable bit-field vectorization to work correctly when we're vectoring inside conds Tamar Christina
2023-07-04 12:05 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-10 15:32 ` Tamar Christina
2023-07-11 11:03 ` Richard Biener
2023-06-28 13:44 ` [PATCH 6/19]middle-end: Don't enter piecewise expansion if VF is not constant Tamar Christina
2023-07-04 12:10 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-06 10:37 ` Tamar Christina
2023-07-06 10:51 ` Richard Biener
2023-06-28 13:44 ` [PATCH 7/19]middle-end: Refactor vectorizer loop conditionals and separate out IV to new variables Tamar Christina
2023-07-13 11:32 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-13 11:54 ` Tamar Christina
2023-07-13 12:10 ` Richard Biener
2023-06-28 13:45 ` [PATCH 8/19]middle-end: updated niters analysis to handle multiple exits Tamar Christina
2023-07-13 11:49 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-13 12:03 ` Tamar Christina
2023-07-14 9:09 ` Richard Biener
2023-06-28 13:45 ` [PATCH 9/19]AArch64 middle-end: refactor vectorizable_comparison to make the main body re-usable Tamar Christina
2023-06-28 13:55 ` [PATCH 9/19] " Tamar Christina
2023-07-13 16:23 ` Richard Biener
2023-06-28 13:46 ` [PATCH 10/19]middle-end: implement vectorizable_early_break Tamar Christina
2023-06-28 13:46 ` [PATCH 11/19]middle-end: implement code motion for early break Tamar Christina
2023-06-28 13:47 ` [PATCH 12/19]middle-end: implement loop peeling and IV updates " Tamar Christina
2023-07-13 17:31 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-13 19:05 ` Tamar Christina
2023-07-14 13:34 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-17 10:56 ` Tamar Christina
2023-07-17 12:48 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-18 11:35 ` Tamar Christina
2023-08-18 12:53 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-18 13:12 ` Tamar Christina
2023-08-18 13:15 ` Richard Biener
2023-10-23 20:21 ` Tamar Christina
2023-06-28 13:47 ` [PATCH 13/19]middle-end testsuite: un-xfail TSVC loops that check for exit control flow vectorization Tamar Christina
2023-06-28 13:47 ` [PATCH 14/19]middle-end testsuite: Add new tests for early break vectorization Tamar Christina
2023-06-28 13:48 ` [PATCH 15/19]AArch64: Add implementation for vector cbranch for Advanced SIMD Tamar Christina
2023-06-28 13:48 ` [PATCH 16/19]AArch64 Add optimization for vector != cbranch fed into compare with 0 " Tamar Christina
2023-06-28 13:48 ` [PATCH 17/19]AArch64 Add optimization for vector cbranch combining SVE and " Tamar Christina
2023-06-28 13:49 ` [PATCH 18/19]Arm: Add Advanced SIMD cbranch implementation Tamar Christina
2023-06-28 13:50 ` [PATCH 19/19]Arm: Add MVE " Tamar Christina
[not found] ` <MW5PR11MB5908414D8B2AB0580A888ECAA924A@MW5PR11MB5908.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2023-06-28 14:49 ` FW: [PATCH v5 0/19] Support early break/return auto-vectorization 钟居哲
2023-06-28 16:00 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-06 7:36 ` [PATCH v6 0/21]middle-end: " Tamar Christina
2023-11-06 7:37 ` [PATCH 1/21]middle-end testsuite: Add more pragma novector to new tests Tamar Christina
2023-11-07 9:46 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-06 7:37 ` [PATCH 2/21]middle-end testsuite: Add tests for early break vectorization Tamar Christina
2023-11-07 9:52 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-16 10:53 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-06 7:37 ` [PATCH 3/21]middle-end: Implement code motion and dependency analysis for early breaks Tamar Christina
2023-11-07 10:53 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-07 11:34 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-07 14:23 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-19 10:11 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-19 14:05 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-20 10:51 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-20 12:24 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-06 7:38 ` [PATCH 4/21]middle-end: update loop peeling code to maintain LCSSA form " Tamar Christina
2023-11-15 0:00 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-15 12:40 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-20 21:51 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-24 10:16 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-24 12:38 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-06 7:38 ` [PATCH 5/21]middle-end: update vectorizer's control update to support picking an exit other than loop latch Tamar Christina
2023-11-07 15:04 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-07 23:10 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-13 20:11 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-14 7:56 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-14 8:07 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-14 23:59 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-15 12:14 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-06 7:38 ` [PATCH 6/21]middle-end: support multiple exits in loop versioning Tamar Christina
2023-11-07 14:54 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-06 7:39 ` [PATCH 7/21]middle-end: update IV update code to support early breaks and arbitrary exits Tamar Christina
2023-11-15 0:03 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-15 13:01 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-15 13:09 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-15 13:22 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-15 14:14 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-16 10:40 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-16 11:08 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-16 11:27 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-16 12:01 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-16 12:30 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-16 13:22 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-16 13:35 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-16 14:14 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-16 14:17 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-16 15:19 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-16 18:41 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-17 10:40 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-17 12:13 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-20 21:54 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-24 10:18 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-24 12:41 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-06 7:39 ` [PATCH 8/21]middle-end: update vectorizable_live_reduction with support for multiple exits and different exits Tamar Christina
2023-11-15 0:05 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-15 13:41 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-15 14:26 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-16 11:16 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-20 21:57 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-24 10:20 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-24 13:23 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-27 22:47 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-29 13:28 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-29 21:22 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-30 13:23 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-06 4:21 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-06 9:33 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-06 7:39 ` [PATCH 9/21]middle-end: implement vectorizable_early_exit for codegen of exit code Tamar Christina
2023-11-27 22:49 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-29 13:50 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-06 4:37 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-06 9:37 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-08 8:58 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-08 10:28 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-08 13:45 ` Tamar Christina [this message]
2023-12-08 13:59 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-08 15:01 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-11 7:09 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-11 9:36 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-11 23:12 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-12 10:10 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-12 10:27 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-12 10:59 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-12-12 11:30 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-13 14:13 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-14 13:12 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-14 18:44 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-06 7:39 ` [PATCH 10/21]middle-end: implement relevancy analysis support for control flow Tamar Christina
2023-11-27 22:49 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-29 14:47 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-06 4:10 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-06 9:44 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-06 7:40 ` [PATCH 11/21]middle-end: wire through peeling changes and dominator updates after guard edge split Tamar Christina
2023-11-06 7:40 ` [PATCH 12/21]middle-end: Add remaining changes to peeling and vectorizer to support early breaks Tamar Christina
2023-11-27 22:48 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-06 8:31 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-06 9:10 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-06 9:27 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-06 7:40 ` [PATCH 13/21]middle-end: Update loop form analysis to support early break Tamar Christina
2023-11-27 22:48 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-06 4:00 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-06 8:18 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-06 8:52 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-06 9:15 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-06 9:29 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-06 7:41 ` [PATCH 14/21]middle-end: Change loop analysis from looking at at number of BB to actual cfg Tamar Christina
2023-11-06 14:44 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-06 7:41 ` [PATCH 15/21]middle-end: [RFC] conditionally support forcing final edge for debugging Tamar Christina
2023-12-09 10:38 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-12-11 7:38 ` Richard Biener
2023-12-11 8:49 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-11 9:00 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-06 7:41 ` [PATCH 16/21]middle-end testsuite: un-xfail TSVC loops that check for exit control flow vectorization Tamar Christina
2023-11-06 7:41 ` [PATCH 17/21]AArch64: Add implementation for vector cbranch for Advanced SIMD Tamar Christina
2023-11-28 16:37 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-11-28 17:55 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-12-06 16:25 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-07 0:56 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-12-14 18:40 ` Tamar Christina
2023-12-14 19:34 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-11-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 18/21]AArch64: Add optimization for vector != cbranch fed into compare with 0 " Tamar Christina
2023-11-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 19/21]AArch64: Add optimization for vector cbranch combining SVE and " Tamar Christina
2023-11-06 7:42 ` [PATCH 20/21]Arm: Add Advanced SIMD cbranch implementation Tamar Christina
2023-11-27 12:48 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-11-06 7:43 ` [PATCH 21/21]Arm: Add MVE " Tamar Christina
2023-11-27 12:47 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-11-06 14:25 ` [PATCH v6 0/21]middle-end: Support early break/return auto-vectorization Richard Biener
2023-11-06 15:17 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-07 9:42 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-07 10:47 ` Tamar Christina
2023-11-07 13:58 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-27 18:30 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-11-28 8:11 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-30 3:47 [PATCH 9/21]middle-end: implement vectorizable_early_exit for codegen of exit code juzhe.zhong
2023-11-30 10:39 ` Tamar Christina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VI1PR08MB5325DB133AC037DD8FF4BB90FF8AA@VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=tamar.christina@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jlaw@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).