From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81BA83858C5F for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:26:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 81BA83858C5F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1676546811; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-to:resent-from:resent-message-id; bh=1uor8bgPaQqiVOaVdtioHWf5QOGdllp6j+vWC13I79U=; b=HlV4mVvJM8OzLw929RobwcORv+QDeD8oooIe9HlxIl0Q8HIcAhaW1Gq4GT7eIyMk6HATnx kjo8Yl2YCewwA64uERDh7TnkxDCwlfN8m60e3bwZMMWtNVFwlCy2ePsNqr/zeiqjVsSag2 qyCYNFf10LNTRLJws5+TRhbGw+3WHLM= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-99-eah8tyhuNkOX-A-eRSH7cQ-1; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 06:26:48 -0500 X-MC-Unique: eah8tyhuNkOX-A-eRSH7cQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94A8E85D063; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.211]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50F46492C3C; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 31GBQKTC2903477 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:26:34 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 31GBQEkw2903476; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:26:14 +0100 Resent-From: Jakub Jelinek Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:26:14 +0100 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-To: Tobias Burnus , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:20:17 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Tobias Burnus Subject: [committed] libgomp: Fix comment typo Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi! I saw FAIL: libgomp.fortran/target-nowait-array-section.f90 -O execution test in my last x86_64-linux bootstrap. From quick skimming, it might be just unreliable test, which assumes that asynchronous execution wouldn't produce ordered sequence, but can't it happen even with asynchronous execution? That said, while skimming the test, I've noticed a comment typo and this patch fixes that up. Tested on x86_64-linux, committed to trunk. 2023-02-16 Jakub Jelinek * testsuite/libgomp.fortran/target-nowait-array-section.f90: Fix comment typo and improve its wording. --- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/target-nowait-array-section.f90.jj 2022-05-16 09:46:02.329060126 +0200 +++ libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/target-nowait-array-section.f90 2023-02-16 12:04:11.227347228 +0100 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -! Runs the the target region asynchrolously and checks for it +! Run the target region asynchronously and check it ! ! Note that map(alloc: work(:, i)) + nowait should be safe ! given that a nondescriptor array is used. However, it still Jakub