public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4] c++: -Wdangling-reference with reference wrapper [PR107532]
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:46:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+KAUnyceKGxghOR@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61a408eb-d9a8-6c3b-4d7a-367fe0d3997e@redhat.com>

On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 05:25:25PM -0800, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 1/24/23 17:49, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 03:19:54PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 1/19/23 21:03, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:02:02PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > > On 1/18/23 20:13, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 04:07:59PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > > > > On 1/18/23 12:52, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > > > > > Here, -Wdangling-reference triggers where it probably shouldn't, causing
> > > > > > > > some grief.  The code in question uses a reference wrapper with a member
> > > > > > > > function returning a reference to a subobject of a non-temporary object:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >       const Plane & meta = fm.planes().inner();
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I've tried a few approaches, e.g., checking that the member function's
> > > > > > > > return type is the same as the type of the enclosing class (which is
> > > > > > > > the case for member functions returning *this), but that then breaks
> > > > > > > > Wdangling-reference4.C with std::optional<std::string>.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > So I figured that perhaps we want to look at the object we're invoking
> > > > > > > > the member function(s) on and see if that is a temporary, as in, don't
> > > > > > > > warn about
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >       const Plane & meta = fm.planes().inner();
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > but do warn about
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >       const Plane & meta = FrameMetadata().planes().inner();
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > It's ugly, but better than asking users to add #pragmas into their code.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hmm, that doesn't seem right; the former is only OK because Ref is in fact a
> > > > > > > reference-like type.  If planes() returned a class that held data, we would
> > > > > > > want to warn.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Sure, it's always some kind of tradeoff with warnings :/.
> > > > > > > In this case, we might recognize the reference-like class because it has a
> > > > > > > reference member and a constructor taking the same reference type.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > That occurred to me too, but then I found out that std::reference_wrapper
> > > > > > actually uses T*, not T&, as you say.  But here's a patch to do that
> > > > > > (I hope).
> > > > > > > That wouldn't help with std::reference_wrapper or std::ref_view because they
> > > > > > > have pointer members instead of references, but perhaps loosening the check
> > > > > > > to include that case would make sense?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by loosening the check.  I could
> > > > > > hardcode std::reference_wrapper and std::ref_view but I don't think that's
> > > > > > what you meant.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Indeed that's not what I meant, but as I was saying in our meeting I think
> > > > > it's worth doing; the compiler has various tweaks to handle specific
> > > > > standard-library classes better.
> > > > Okay, done in the patch below.  Except that I'm not including a test for
> > > > std::ranges::ref_view because I don't really know how that works.
> > > > 
> > > > > > Surely I cannot _not_ warn for any class that contains a T*.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I was thinking if a constructor takes a T& and the class has a T* that would
> > > > > be close enough, though this also wouldn't handle the standard library
> > > > > classes so the benefit is questionable.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Here's the patch so that we have some actual code to discuss...  Thanks.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > -- >8 --
> > > > > > Here, -Wdangling-reference triggers where it probably shouldn't, causing
> > > > > > some grief.  The code in question uses a reference wrapper with a member
> > > > > > function returning a reference to a subobject of a non-temporary object:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >      const Plane & meta = fm.planes().inner();
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I've tried a few approaches, e.g., checking that the member function's
> > > > > > return type is the same as the type of the enclosing class (which is
> > > > > > the case for member functions returning *this), but that then breaks
> > > > > > Wdangling-reference4.C with std::optional<std::string>.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Perhaps we want to look at the member function's enclosing class
> > > > > > to see if it's a reference wrapper class (meaning, has a reference
> > > > > > member and a constructor taking the same reference type) and don't
> > > > > > warn if so, supposing that the member function returns a reference
> > > > > > to a non-temporary object.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > It's ugly, but better than asking users to add #pragmas into their code.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 	PR c++/107532
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 	* call.cc (do_warn_dangling_reference): Don't warn when the
> > > > > > 	member function comes from a reference wrapper class.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Let's factor the new code out into e.g. reference_like_class_p
> > > > 
> > > > Done.  Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
> > > > 
> > > > -- >8 --
> > > > Here, -Wdangling-reference triggers where it probably shouldn't, causing
> > > > some grief.  The code in question uses a reference wrapper with a member
> > > > function returning a reference to a subobject of a non-temporary object:
> > > > 
> > > >     const Plane & meta = fm.planes().inner();
> > > > 
> > > > I've tried a few approaches, e.g., checking that the member function's
> > > > return type is the same as the type of the enclosing class (which is
> > > > the case for member functions returning *this), but that then breaks
> > > > Wdangling-reference4.C with std::optional<std::string>.
> > > > 
> > > > Perhaps we want to look at the member function's enclosing class
> > > > to see if it's a reference wrapper class (meaning, has a reference
> > > > member and a constructor taking the same reference type, or is
> > > > std::reference_wrapper or std::ranges::ref_view) and don't warn if so,
> > > > supposing that the member function returns a reference to a non-temporary
> > > > object.
> > > > 
> > > > It's ugly, but better than asking users to add #pragmas into their code.
> > > > 
> > > > 	PR c++/107532
> > > > 
> > > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> > > > 
> > > > 	* call.cc (reference_like_class_p): New.
> > > > 	(do_warn_dangling_reference): Don't warn when the member function comes
> > > > 	from a reference_like_class_p.
> > > > 
> > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > > > 
> > > > 	* g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference8.C: New test.
> > > > 	* g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference9.C: New test.
> > > > ---
> > > >    gcc/cp/call.cc                                | 48 ++++++++++++
> > > >    .../g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference8.C        | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > >    .../g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference9.C        | 21 +++++
> > > >    3 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
> > > >    create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference8.C
> > > >    create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference9.C
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
> > > > index 991730713e6..672722998ee 100644
> > > > --- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
> > > > +++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
> > > > @@ -13777,6 +13777,45 @@ std_pair_ref_ref_p (tree t)
> > > >      return true;
> > > >    }
> > > > +/* Return true if a class CTYPE is either std::reference_wrapper or
> > > > +   std::ref_view, or a reference wrapper class.  We consider a class
> > > > +   a reference wrapper class if it has a reference member and a
> > > > +   constructor taking the same reference type.  */
> > > > +
> > > > +static bool
> > > > +reference_like_class_p (tree ctype)
> > > > +{
> > > > +  tree tdecl = TYPE_NAME (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (ctype));
> > > > +  if (decl_in_std_namespace_p (tdecl))
> > > > +    {
> > > > +      tree name = DECL_NAME (tdecl);
> > > > +      return (name
> > > > +	      && (id_equal (name, "reference_wrapper")
> > > > +		  || id_equal (name, "ref_view")));
> > > > +    }
> > > > +  for (tree fields = TYPE_FIELDS (ctype);
> > > > +       fields;
> > > > +       fields = DECL_CHAIN (fields))
> > > > +    {
> > > > +      if (TREE_CODE (fields) != FIELD_DECL || DECL_ARTIFICIAL (fields))
> > > > +	continue;
> > > > +      tree type = TREE_TYPE (fields);
> > > > +      if (!TYPE_REF_P (type))
> > > > +	continue;
> > > > +      /* OK, the field is a reference member.  Do we have a constructor
> > > > +	 taking its type?  */
> > > > +      for (tree fn : ovl_range (CLASSTYPE_CONSTRUCTORS (ctype)))
> > > > +	{
> > > > +	  tree args = FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (fn);
> > > > +	  if (args
> > > > +	      && same_type_p (TREE_VALUE (args), type)
> > > > +	      && TREE_CHAIN (args) == void_list_node)
> > > > +	    return true;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +    }
> > > > +  return false;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >    /* Helper for maybe_warn_dangling_reference to find a problematic CALL_EXPR
> > > >       that initializes the LHS (and at least one of its arguments represents
> > > >       a temporary, as outlined in maybe_warn_dangling_reference), or NULL_TREE
> > > > @@ -13832,6 +13871,15 @@ do_warn_dangling_reference (tree expr)
> > > >    	if (!(TYPE_REF_OBJ_P (rettype) || std_pair_ref_ref_p (rettype)))
> > > >    	  return NULL_TREE;
> > > > +	/* An attempt to reduce the number of -Wdangling-reference
> > > > +	   false positives concerning reference wrappers (c++/107532).
> > > > +	   Here we suppose that a member function of such a reference
> > > > +	   wrapper class returns a reference to a non-temporary object.  */
> > > > +	if (DECL_NONSTATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (fndecl)
> > > > +	    && !DECL_OVERLOADED_OPERATOR_P (fndecl)
> > > > +	    && reference_like_class_p (CP_DECL_CONTEXT (fndecl)))
> > > 
> > > Ah, in this case I was thinking rather than return we would want to look
> > > through to the initializer of the reference wrapper, and warn if that's a
> > > temporary, so we can catch the *2 cases in your tests.
> > > 
> > > So, treating ref-like classes as much like references as we can.  Some of
> > > your v1 patch ought to be useful in implementing this, but only looking
> > > through one call at a time, not all of them like that patch.
> > 
> > Maybe this one, then?  I still have to loop through the calls though; EXPR in
> > do_warn_dangling_reference can be e.g.
> > 
> > Ref<const Plane>::inner (&TARGET_EXPR <D.2839, FrameMetadata::planes ((const struct FrameMetadata *) fm)>)
> > 
> > or
> > 
> > Ref<const Plane>::inner (&TARGET_EXPR <D.2908, FrameMetadata::planes (&TARGET_EXPR <D.2898, {.p_={.bytesused=0}}>)>)
> > 
> > and we want to warn only about the latter, but that means that I need to
> > look into the nested call 'planes' to see if the initializer was a temporary.
> 
> Right, but I was thinking we want to recurse like a few lines above, rather
> than loop.

Ah yes, I can do that if I introduce a parameter that tells us
if we're processing an argument or not.  I think I'm finally
more or less satisfied with the patch, thanks.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

-- >8 --
Here, -Wdangling-reference triggers where it probably shouldn't, causing
some grief.  The code in question uses a reference wrapper with a member
function returning a reference to a subobject of a non-temporary object:

  const Plane & meta = fm.planes().inner();

I've tried a few approaches, e.g., checking that the member function's
return type is the same as the type of the enclosing class (which is
the case for member functions returning *this), but that then breaks
Wdangling-reference4.C with std::optional<std::string>.

This patch adjusts do_warn_dangling_reference so that we look through
reference wrapper classes (meaning, has a reference member and a
constructor taking the same reference type, or is std::reference_wrapper
or std::ranges::ref_view) and don't warn for them, supposing that the
member function returns a reference to a non-temporary object.

	PR c++/107532

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* call.cc (reference_like_class_p): New.
	(do_warn_dangling_reference): Add new bool parameter.  See through
	reference_like_class_p.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference8.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference9.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/call.cc                                | 97 +++++++++++++++----
 .../g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference8.C        | 77 +++++++++++++++
 .../g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference9.C        | 21 ++++
 3 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference8.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference9.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
index f7c5d9da94b..2a8edc2e7e2 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
@@ -13777,6 +13777,45 @@ std_pair_ref_ref_p (tree t)
   return true;
 }
 
+/* Return true if a class CTYPE is either std::reference_wrapper or
+   std::ref_view, or a reference wrapper class.  We consider a class
+   a reference wrapper class if it has a reference member and a
+   constructor taking the same reference type.  */
+
+static bool
+reference_like_class_p (tree ctype)
+{
+  tree tdecl = TYPE_NAME (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (ctype));
+  if (decl_in_std_namespace_p (tdecl))
+    {
+      tree name = DECL_NAME (tdecl);
+      return (name
+	      && (id_equal (name, "reference_wrapper")
+		  || id_equal (name, "ref_view")));
+    }
+  for (tree fields = TYPE_FIELDS (ctype);
+       fields;
+       fields = DECL_CHAIN (fields))
+    {
+      if (TREE_CODE (fields) != FIELD_DECL || DECL_ARTIFICIAL (fields))
+	continue;
+      tree type = TREE_TYPE (fields);
+      if (!TYPE_REF_P (type))
+	continue;
+      /* OK, the field is a reference member.  Do we have a constructor
+	 taking its type?  */
+      for (tree fn : ovl_range (CLASSTYPE_CONSTRUCTORS (ctype)))
+	{
+	  tree args = FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (fn);
+	  if (args
+	      && same_type_p (TREE_VALUE (args), type)
+	      && TREE_CHAIN (args) == void_list_node)
+	    return true;
+	}
+    }
+  return false;
+}
+
 /* Helper for maybe_warn_dangling_reference to find a problematic CALL_EXPR
    that initializes the LHS (and at least one of its arguments represents
    a temporary, as outlined in maybe_warn_dangling_reference), or NULL_TREE
@@ -13791,12 +13830,39 @@ std_pair_ref_ref_p (tree t)
      const int& y = (f(1), 42); // NULL_TREE
      const int& z = f(f(1)); // f(f(1))
 
-   EXPR is the initializer.  */
+   EXPR is the initializer.  If ARG_P is true, we're processing an argument
+   to a function; the point is to distinguish between, for example,
+
+     Ref::inner (&TARGET_EXPR <D.2839, F::foo (fm)>)
+
+   where we shouldn't warn, and
+
+     Ref::inner (&TARGET_EXPR <D.2908, F::foo (&TARGET_EXPR <...>)>)
+
+   where we should warn (Ref is a reference_like_class_p so we see through
+   it.  */
 
 static tree
-do_warn_dangling_reference (tree expr)
+do_warn_dangling_reference (tree expr, bool arg_p)
 {
   STRIP_NOPS (expr);
+  if (TREE_CODE (expr) == ADDR_EXPR)
+    expr = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0);
+
+  if (arg_p && expr_represents_temporary_p (expr))
+    {
+      /* An attempt to reduce the number of -Wdangling-reference
+	 false positives concerning reference wrappers (c++/107532).
+	 Here we suppose that a member function of such a reference
+	 wrapper class returns a reference to a non-temporary object.  */
+      tree e = expr;
+      while (handled_component_p (e))
+	e = TREE_OPERAND (e, 0);
+      e = TREE_TYPE (e);
+      if (!CLASS_TYPE_P (e) || !reference_like_class_p (e))
+	return expr;
+    }
+
   switch (TREE_CODE (expr))
     {
     case CALL_EXPR:
@@ -13829,7 +13895,8 @@ do_warn_dangling_reference (tree expr)
 	     std::pair<const int&, const int&> v = std::minmax(1, 2);
 	   which also creates a dangling reference, because std::minmax
 	   returns std::pair<const T&, const T&>(b, a).  */
-	if (!(TYPE_REF_OBJ_P (rettype) || std_pair_ref_ref_p (rettype)))
+	if (!arg_p
+	    && (!(TYPE_REF_OBJ_P (rettype) || std_pair_ref_ref_p (rettype))))
 	  return NULL_TREE;
 
 	/* Here we're looking to see if any of the arguments is a temporary
@@ -13842,14 +13909,10 @@ do_warn_dangling_reference (tree expr)
 	    if (!DECL_NONSTATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (fndecl)
 		&& !TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (arg)))
 	      continue;
-	    /* It could also be another call taking a temporary and returning
-	       it and initializing this reference parameter.  */
-	    if (do_warn_dangling_reference (arg))
-	      return expr;
-	    STRIP_NOPS (arg);
-	    if (TREE_CODE (arg) == ADDR_EXPR)
-	      arg = TREE_OPERAND (arg, 0);
-	    if (expr_represents_temporary_p (arg))
+	    /* Recurse to see if the argument is a temporary.  It could also
+	       be another call taking a temporary and returning it and
+	       initializing this reference parameter.  */
+	    if (do_warn_dangling_reference (arg, /*arg_p=*/true))
 	      return expr;
 	  /* Don't warn about member function like:
 	      std::any a(...);
@@ -13866,15 +13929,15 @@ do_warn_dangling_reference (tree expr)
 	return NULL_TREE;
       }
     case COMPOUND_EXPR:
-      return do_warn_dangling_reference (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1));
+      return do_warn_dangling_reference (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1), arg_p);
     case COND_EXPR:
-      if (tree t = do_warn_dangling_reference (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1)))
+      if (tree t = do_warn_dangling_reference (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1), arg_p))
 	return t;
-      return do_warn_dangling_reference (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2));
+      return do_warn_dangling_reference (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2), arg_p);
     case PAREN_EXPR:
-      return do_warn_dangling_reference (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0));
+      return do_warn_dangling_reference (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), arg_p);
     case TARGET_EXPR:
-      return do_warn_dangling_reference (TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (expr));
+      return do_warn_dangling_reference (TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (expr), arg_p);
     default:
       return NULL_TREE;
     }
@@ -13917,7 +13980,7 @@ maybe_warn_dangling_reference (const_tree decl, tree init)
     = make_temp_override (global_dc->dc_warn_system_headers,
 			  (!in_system_header_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl))
 			   || global_dc->dc_warn_system_headers));
-  if (tree call = do_warn_dangling_reference (init))
+  if (tree call = do_warn_dangling_reference (init, /*arg_p=*/false))
     {
       auto_diagnostic_group d;
       if (warning_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl), OPT_Wdangling_reference,
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference8.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference8.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..330de1fd05d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference8.C
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+// PR c++/107532
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wdangling-reference" }
+
+struct Plane { unsigned int bytesused; };
+
+// Passes a reference through. Does not change lifetime.
+template <typename T>
+struct Ref {
+    const T& i_;
+    Ref(const T & i) : i_(i) {}
+    const T & inner();
+};
+
+struct FrameMetadata {
+    Ref<const Plane> planes() const { return p_; }
+
+    Plane p_;
+};
+
+void bar(const Plane & meta);
+void foo(const FrameMetadata & fm)
+{
+    const Plane & meta = fm.planes().inner();
+    bar(meta);
+    const Plane & meta2 = FrameMetadata().planes().inner(); // { dg-warning "dangling reference" }
+    bar(meta2);
+}
+
+struct S {
+  const S& self () { return *this; }
+} s;
+
+const S& r1 = s.self();
+const S& r2 = S().self(); // { dg-warning "dangling reference" }
+
+struct D {
+};
+
+struct C {
+  D d;
+  Ref<const D> get() const { return d; }
+};
+
+struct B {
+  C c;
+  const C& get() const { return c; }
+  B();
+};
+
+struct A {
+  B b;
+  const B& get() const { return b; }
+};
+
+void
+g (const A& a)
+{
+  const auto& d1 = a.get().get().get().inner();
+  (void) d1;
+  const auto& d2 = A().get().get().get().inner(); // { dg-warning "dangling reference" }
+  (void) d2;
+  const auto& d3 = A().b.get().get().inner(); // { dg-warning "dangling reference" }
+  (void) d3;
+  const auto& d4 = a.b.get().get().inner();
+  (void) d4;
+  const auto& d5 = a.b.c.get().inner();
+  (void) d5;
+  const auto& d6 = A().b.c.get().inner(); // { dg-warning "dangling reference" }
+  (void) d6;
+  Plane p;
+  Ref<Plane> r(p);
+  const auto& d7 = r.inner();
+  (void) d7;
+  const auto& d8 = Ref<Plane>(p).inner();
+  (void) d8;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference9.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference9.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9ad83f7365e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference9.C
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// PR c++/107532
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wdangling-reference" }
+
+#include <functional>
+
+struct X { int n; };
+
+struct S {
+  std::reference_wrapper<const X> wrapit() const { return x; }
+  X x;
+};
+
+void
+g (const S& s)
+{
+  const auto& a1 = s.wrapit().get();
+  (void) a1;
+  const auto& a2 = S().wrapit().get(); // { dg-warning "dangling reference" }
+  (void) a2;
+}

base-commit: f661c0bb6371f355966a67b5ce71398e80792948
-- 
2.39.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-07 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-18 17:52 [PATCH] " Marek Polacek
2023-01-18 21:07 ` Jason Merrill
2023-01-19  1:13   ` [PATCH v2] " Marek Polacek
2023-01-19 18:02     ` Jason Merrill
2023-01-20  2:03       ` [PATCH v3] " Marek Polacek
2023-01-20 20:19         ` Jason Merrill
2023-01-24 22:49           ` Marek Polacek
2023-02-06  1:25             ` Jason Merrill
2023-02-07 16:46               ` Marek Polacek [this message]
2023-03-01 20:34                 ` [PATCH v4] " Marek Polacek
2023-03-01 21:53                 ` Jason Merrill
2023-03-02 21:24                   ` Marek Polacek
2023-03-03 16:25                     ` Jason Merrill
2023-03-03 17:50                       ` [PATCH v5] " Marek Polacek
2023-03-04  2:30                         ` Jason Merrill
2023-03-06 21:54                           ` [PATCH v6] " Marek Polacek
2023-03-07 14:37                             ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y+KAUnyceKGxghOR@redhat.com \
    --to=polacek@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).