From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 625F33858D39 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:16:18 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 625F33858D39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1675847777; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type; bh=LHzVzZoakcJ0yNeo2t4IZB0nl2v3n0LkWXCrKMx7Fkw=; b=ZUSMKWF9/4KGwCbAYuwEQr+VVFY/EqJ5byDRXiyKYAfwsRYPUqe235LgTvwWbWH+3ItN3+ 9Smb5SKIJFL0kVQMDgiNO1BwYJvqHxRZkPM/ZDZHcxnIU3hf60Hz7QmSeanR82xMImDJju 10NmgwxI599vLSqPFHuK+SBiKORU1OY= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-43-ssMAhxK2PEGHeDd1M380mw-1; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 04:16:16 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ssMAhxK2PEGHeDd1M380mw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F4DC101A55E; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.223]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B84C492C3E; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 3189GCVn3943247 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 8 Feb 2023 10:16:12 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 3189GB5F3943246; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 10:16:11 +0100 Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 10:16:10 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Richard Sandiford , Richard Biener Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] tree.def: Remove outdated comment on SAD_EXPR Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi! While looking at PR108692, I've noticed SAD_EXPR comment mentions that WIDEN_MINUS_EXPR is missing, which is not true anymore since r11-5160. The following patch just removes that part of the comment. Ok for trunk? 2023-02-08 Jakub Jelinek * tree.def (SAD_EXPR): Remove outdated comment about missing WIDEN_MINUS_EXPR. --- gcc/tree.def.jj 2023-01-02 09:32:28.118202450 +0100 +++ gcc/tree.def 2023-02-08 10:05:52.795587292 +0100 @@ -1341,8 +1341,7 @@ DEFTREECODE (WIDEN_SUM_EXPR, "widen_sum_ The first two arguments are of type t1 which should be integer. The third argument and the result are of type t2, such that t2 is at least twice the size of t1. Like DOT_PROD_EXPR, SAD_EXPR (arg1,arg2,arg3) is - equivalent to (note we don't have WIDEN_MINUS_EXPR now, but we assume its - behavior is similar to WIDEN_SUM_EXPR): + equivalent to: tmp = WIDEN_MINUS_EXPR (arg1, arg2) tmp2 = ABS_EXPR (tmp) arg3 = PLUS_EXPR (tmp2, arg3) Jakub