From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] tree-optimization/107389 - honor __builtin_assume_alignment at -O0
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 14:05:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2pUHswt4peOqElT@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221108125348.BFC2213398@imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 01:53:48PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> The following makes sure to set alignment information on the LHS
> of __builtin_assume_alignment calls even when not optimizing so
> uses as arguments to builtin functions like memcpy or __atomic_load_n
> can be reflected at RTL expansion time.
>
> Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, OK?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>
> PR tree-optimization/107389
> * gimple-low.cc (lower_builtin_assume_aligned): New.
> (lower_stmt): Call it.
>
> * gcc.dg/pr107389.c: New testcase.
> ---
> gcc/gimple-low.cc | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr107389.c | 13 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr107389.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-low.cc b/gcc/gimple-low.cc
> index 512aa9feada..f9bcb772163 100644
> --- a/gcc/gimple-low.cc
> +++ b/gcc/gimple-low.cc
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static void lower_try_catch (gimple_stmt_iterator *, struct lower_data *);
> static void lower_gimple_return (gimple_stmt_iterator *, struct lower_data *);
> static void lower_builtin_setjmp (gimple_stmt_iterator *);
> static void lower_builtin_posix_memalign (gimple_stmt_iterator *);
> +static void lower_builtin_assume_aligned (gimple_stmt_iterator *);
>
>
> /* Lower the body of current_function_decl from High GIMPLE into Low
> @@ -768,6 +769,13 @@ lower_stmt (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, struct lower_data *data)
> lower_builtin_posix_memalign (gsi);
> return;
> }
> + else if (DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (decl) == BUILT_IN_ASSUME_ALIGNED
> + && !optimize)
> + {
> + lower_builtin_assume_aligned (gsi);
> + data->cannot_fallthru = false;
> + return;
> + }
> }
>
> if (decl && (flags_from_decl_or_type (decl) & ECF_NORETURN))
> @@ -1310,6 +1318,39 @@ lower_builtin_posix_memalign (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi)
> gsi_insert_after (gsi, stmt, GSI_NEW_STMT);
> gsi_insert_after (gsi, gimple_build_label (noalign_label), GSI_NEW_STMT);
> }
> +
> +/* Lower calls to __builtin_assume_aligned when not optimizing. */
> +
> +static void
> +lower_builtin_assume_aligned (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi)
> +{
> + gcall *call = as_a <gcall *> (gsi_stmt (*gsi));
> +
> + tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (call);
> + if (!lhs || !POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs)))
> + return;
I think nothing checks that TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME,
that isn't guaranteed before ssa pass.
Otherwise LGTM.
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-08 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-08 12:53 Richard Biener
2022-11-08 13:05 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-11-08 13:38 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2pUHswt4peOqElT@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).