From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Emit 16b atomics inline with -m64 -mcx16 -mavx [PR104688]
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:13:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3IGryh4X3fL0Fzv@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZc-bxEKuUqvgZt_TRuJNOGRHYpnkHphNGZuFZTLxeHrVgAOA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:04:24PM +0800, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 3:57 PM Uros Bizjak via Gcc-patches
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:52 AM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Working virtually out of Baker Island.
> > >
> > > Given
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688#c10
> > > the following patch implements atomic load/store (and therefore also
> > > enabling compare and exchange) for -m64 -mcx16 -mavx.
> > >
> > > Ok for trunk if it passes bootstrap/regtest?
> >
> > We only have guarantee from Intel and AMD, there can be other vendors.
> Can we make it a as a micro-architecture tuning?
No, -mtune= isn't a guarantee the code will be executed only on certain CPUs
(-march= is), -mtune= is only about optimizing code for certain CPU.
If we don't get a guarantee from the remaining makers of CPUs with AVX +
CX16 ISAs, another option would be to add a new -mvmovdqa-atomic option
and set it on for -march= of Intel and AMD CPUs with AVX + CX16
and use
TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_CMPXCHG16B && TARGET_AVX && TARGET_VMOVDQA_ATOMIC
as the conditions in the patch.
But that would use it only for -march=native or when people -march=
a particular Intel or AMD CPU, while if we get a guarantee from all AVX+CX16
CPU makers, then it can be on by default with just -mcx16 -mavx.
Jakub
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-14 7:52 Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-14 7:57 ` Uros Bizjak
2022-11-14 9:04 ` Hongtao Liu
2022-11-14 9:08 ` Hongtao Liu
2022-11-14 9:13 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3IGryh4X3fL0Fzv@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=crazylht@gmail.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).