From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7F8B384B054 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:54:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B7F8B384B054 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1668502447; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=ajRtW2p6omVe06N+M72QvAQfO6tkISnVbO9VaLd7jA8=; b=giMqdfOXkITFqhl9i29stozbm9UgQM7st/a8t+JP4+5UbL4UGJjXOKoP1MJRqS/z2W+Awe eAqTYxBt+OPu5MrU9mlIUfOnPOh4p+/PDFYwU1cGG8V/n7+CWJT+q30huCZtzy5xmLiB9b +jKx5LtDlS72QyMz6ogLDSJOc2IV0GE= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-43-QAPwMIq8OT-TSm9GG0L1pw-1; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 03:54:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: QAPwMIq8OT-TSm9GG0L1pw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BECED855455 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.38]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FBAE49BB60; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 2AF8s0xS547972 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:54:01 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 2AF8s0Fk547971; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:54:00 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:54:00 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Jason Merrill Cc: Patrick Palka , Jonathan Wakely , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] c++, v2: Allow attributes on concepts - DR 2428 Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 07:00:54PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote: > > The following patch adds parsing of attributes to concept definition, > > allows deprecated attribute to be specified (some ugliness needed > > because CONCEPT_DECL is a cp/*.def attribute and so can't be mentioned > > in c-family/ directly; used what is used for objc method decls, > > an alternative would be a langhook) > > Several of the codes in c-common.def are C++-only, you might just move it > over? > > > and checks TREE_DEPRECATED in > > build_standard_check (not sure if that is the right spot, or whether > > it shouldn't be checked also for variable and function concepts and > > how to write testcase coverage for that). > > I wouldn't bother with var/fn concepts, they're obsolete. Ok, so like this? The previous version passed bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, I'll of course test this one as well. Jakub