From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] docs: Suggest options to improve ASAN stack traces
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:34:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5H1+kCo+hcQsDHU@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y5H0fUumuy7FeNZX@tucnak>
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 03:28:13PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 09:11:54AM -0500, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:25:26AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches:
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > > > index 726392409b6..2de14466dd3 100644
> > > > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > > > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > > > @@ -16510,6 +16510,14 @@ The option cannot be combined with @option{-fsanitize=thread} or
> > > > @option{-fsanitize=hwaddress}. Note that the only target
> > > > @option{-fsanitize=hwaddress} is currently supported on is AArch64.
> > > >
> > > > +To get more accurate stack traces, it is possible to use options such as
> > > > +@option{-O} (which, for instance, prevents most function inlining),
> > > > +@option{-fno-optimize-sibling-calls} (which prevents optimizing sibling
> > > > +and tail recursive calls), or @option{-fno-ipa-icf} (which disables Identical
> > > > +Code Folding for functions and read-only variables). Since multiple runs
> > > > +of the program may yield backtraces with different addresses due to ASLR,
> > > > +it may be desirable to turn off ASLR: @samp{setarch `uname -m` -R ./prog}.
> > >
> > > What about -fasynchronous-unwind-tables? It should help if ASAN ever
> > > reports stray segmentation faults. Whether it also helps in general
> > > depends on whether ASAN maintains ABI around its instrumentation.
> >
> > I'm not sure. Someone else will have to decide if we want to mention
> > that option as well.
>
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables is on by default on many targets, so I wouldn't
> mention it:
> grep asynchronous_unwind_tables common/*/*/* config/*/*
> common/config/aarch64/aarch64-common.cc: { OPT_LEVELS_ALL, OPT_fasynchronous_unwind_tables, NULL, 1 },
> common/config/i386/i386-common.cc: opts->x_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables = 2;
> common/config/loongarch/loongarch-common.cc: { OPT_LEVELS_ALL, OPT_fasynchronous_unwind_tables, NULL, 1 },
> common/config/rs6000/rs6000-common.cc: opts->x_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables = 1;
> common/config/s390/s390-common.cc: opts->x_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables = 1;
> config/i386/i386-options.cc: if (opts->x_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables == 2)
> config/i386/i386-options.cc: opts->x_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables = !USE_IX86_FRAME_POINTER;
> config/mips/mips.cc: && !global_options_set.x_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables)
> config/mips/mips.cc: flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables = 1;
> config/rs6000/rs6000.cc: && !OPTION_SET_P (flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables))
> config/rs6000/rs6000.cc: flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables = 1;
>
> On the other side, the @samp{setarch `uname -m` -R ./prog} suggestion is
> very Linux specific, so if we mention it at all, it should mention that
> "e.g. on Linux through ..." or something similar.
> I also wouldn't mention the "and read-only variables" part, that is
> irrelevant for stack traces.
Thanks, updated patch here. I've also expanded the ASLR acronym.
Ok?
-- >8 --
I got a complaint that while Clang docs suggest options that improve
the quality of the backtraces ASAN prints (cf.
<https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html#usage>), our docs
don't say anything to that effect. This patch amends that with a new
paragraph. (It deliberately doesn't mention -fno-omit-frame-pointer.)
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/invoke.texi (-fsanitize=address): Suggest options to improve
stack traces.
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 726392409b6..1641efecf18 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -16510,6 +16510,15 @@ The option cannot be combined with @option{-fsanitize=thread} or
@option{-fsanitize=hwaddress}. Note that the only target
@option{-fsanitize=hwaddress} is currently supported on is AArch64.
+To get more accurate stack traces, it is possible to use options such as
+@option{-O} (which, for instance, prevents most function inlining),
+@option{-fno-optimize-sibling-calls} (which prevents optimizing sibling
+and tail recursive calls), or @option{-fno-ipa-icf} (which disables Identical
+Code Folding for functions). Since multiple runs of the program may yield
+backtraces with different addresses due to ASLR (Address Space Layout
+Randomization), it may be desirable to turn ASLR off. On Linux, this can be
+achieved with @samp{setarch `uname -m` -R ./prog}.
+
@item -fsanitize=kernel-address
@opindex fsanitize=kernel-address
Enable AddressSanitizer for Linux kernel.
base-commit: d9f9d5d30feb33c359955d7030cc6be50ef6dc0a
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-08 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-07 20:34 [PATCH] " Marek Polacek
2022-12-08 7:25 ` Florian Weimer
2022-12-08 14:11 ` Marek Polacek
2022-12-08 14:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-12-08 14:34 ` Marek Polacek [this message]
2022-12-08 15:00 ` [PATCH v2] " Jakub Jelinek
2022-12-08 22:56 ` [PATCH v3] " Marek Polacek
2022-12-08 23:11 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5H1+kCo+hcQsDHU@redhat.com \
--to=polacek@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).