From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A723887CEB for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:42:28 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D4A723887CEB Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1670845348; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NHL17E8eH6YlcSA+l7VjKXqP2UK7ug9KWsfBgsTuIFU=; b=OuUy5zlxPi4xN2Tp8viKVUi306JiXw9cit1dKxETDhTuIhTSFzpnySmkq/fmCSXxuoqvGg CjYc7p+Rsh4Jp4hH4KYONadp9Izn8Locoz7/enF+eBR4uzhVAJ0R02FK+KBM6aY1jEPDml oU5Eb08YLpsk6maeSAvjloHGfN5GN14= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-299-6huyOeyRMEWchbPb947Osg-1; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 06:42:25 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 6huyOeyRMEWchbPb947Osg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC02E805AC5; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.195.114]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9962740C2004; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 2BCBgJm03901344 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:42:19 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 2BCBgILK3901343; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:42:18 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:42:17 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Martin =?utf-8?B?TGnFoWth?= Cc: Richard Biener , GCC Patches , Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] Backport gcc-12: jobserver FIFO support Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <8b594fb7-343d-ca34-20c7-e15f6315c884@suse.cz> <291363f6-970c-031f-0f27-f58a7195435f@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <291363f6-970c-031f-0f27-f58a7195435f@suse.cz> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:39:36PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > > I'm fine with backporting the whole > > series to GCC 12 but I wonder if earlier still maintained versions are also > > affected (noting that the series also addresses WPA streaming which is > > not part of the "troubles" here). > > Yes, they are also affected. > > So ready for all active branches? Can't you backport instead a minimal fix that will not change other stuff? Jakub