From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 691853858D1E for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 12:53:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 691853858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1671454439; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type; bh=AiTAGjRqlhrw8beeaHukr0rHewGO0SSjBnFFdAcxzvY=; b=Dy3DC+861w0PDvz5whVoC+wfpqSZY0/Mnmx+BSXaPC77DGwvGFSNut/xN6iz94H3//8UKY zPCbfwjGwvbLRdvXHw9/4hXdr7GvtNjYv3hhMvzgEuqK1NA6k7bvNzPk2isJRmOBmTcJwz AFDOA1n8PCms3aZckkIfotKNv5pNLSE= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-606-tVk9HZCmPtK1z1yVAY3usQ-1; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 07:53:50 -0500 X-MC-Unique: tVk9HZCmPtK1z1yVAY3usQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B15018A6460 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 12:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.195.114]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6BA492B00 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 12:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 2BJCrl6v778046 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 13:53:47 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 2BJCrksu778045 for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 13:53:46 +0100 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 13:53:46 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [committed] testsuite: Fix up pr64536.c for LLP64 targets [PR108151] Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi! The test casts a pointer to long, which is ok for ilp32 and lp64 targets but not for llp64 targets. Nothing reads the values later, it is a link test, so all we care about is that it is the same cast on s390x-linux where it used to fail before the PR64536 fix, and that we don't warn about it. Tested on x86_64-linux -m32/-m64 and with a cross to s390x-linux, committed to trunk as obvious. 2022-12-19 Jakub Jelinek PR testsuite/108151 * gcc.dg/pr64536.c (bar): Use casts to __INTPTR_TYPE__ rather than long when casting pointer to integral type. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr64536.c.jj 2020-01-12 11:54:37.489397175 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr64536.c 2022-12-19 13:44:42.608091278 +0100 @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ bar (int x) } else i = (long *) (h->q = *f); - *c++ = (long) f; + *c++ = (__INTPTR_TYPE__) f; e += 6; } else @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ bar (int x) } else i = (long *) (h->q = *f); - *c++ = (long) f; + *c++ = (__INTPTR_TYPE__) f; e += 6; } } Jakub