From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C16583858D1E for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 14:58:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C16583858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1671721128; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=AnjCuDGhMsbuVJPmlI2zvR3CMpuRahyw/XhntzIrxIU=; b=fDNa5NgBiWamZGqbhifILkNt568CU1sxmnh5rHM6odOh0WY993TA490J8BE42n+5OOXG83 nVq3Pgtca1mVV30yfGv28Q3km4UdB2JiYoAeFZS8TOfLR3V6wo2aK3RISR40hX9Bxsfge5 wadwjgQcZ6Y4NaYHy3qCML2g2QCbmVs= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-550-grI000u5MfO3DI0bjqfIlA-1; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 09:58:46 -0500 X-MC-Unique: grI000u5MfO3DI0bjqfIlA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 876433813F2E; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 14:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.195.114]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4981BC15BA0; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 14:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 2BMEwhc01198100 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:58:43 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 2BMEwfZ11198099; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:58:41 +0100 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:58:41 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Richard Biener Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootstrap/106482 - document minimal GCC version Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20221222145404.2AB0313918@imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20221222145404.2AB0313918@imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.8 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 03:54:03PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > There's no explicit mention of what GCC compiler supports C++11 > and the cross compiler build requirement mentions GCC 4.8 but not > GCC 4.8.3 which is the earliest known version to not run into > C++11 implementation bugs. The following adds explicit wording. > > OK for trunk? > > Thanks, > Richard. > > PR bootstrap/106482 > * doc/install.texi (ISO C++11 Compiler): Document GCC version > known to work. LGTM, thanks. Jakub