From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236CF3858D35 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:49:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 236CF3858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1673520594; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=VlcDYnkaJbaxGCx1ZWSC1NnphGrvxdSKLoLf4ctOvJk=; b=DtG0o32vpDoApvJKUdyntot4BFFA5JZZAxQ/h7O7ZxzlbBs26IlnUmn8ahJ1u9fB2yr33d 7TXwhs2vSspVXhB1uuCFJJRjNv59G0wEwnWgwcP4ETi4GENmWMO6GFSlUSBpPSPL5q68nE zYmGXouxQ9P6OY1ToxeAqZylTuP+wc8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-588-faWqS8C-Pwi6QVC0WG7NMQ-1; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 05:49:51 -0500 X-MC-Unique: faWqS8C-Pwi6QVC0WG7NMQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 264D43C2274B; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.223]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D157C140EBF5; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 30CAnlF83415264 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:49:48 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 30CAnkug3415263; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:49:46 +0100 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:49:46 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Wilco Dijkstra Cc: Martin =?utf-8?B?TGnFoWth?= , Kyrylo Tkachov , Szabolcs Nagy , Richard Sandiford , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] libgcc: Fix uninitialized RA signing on AArch64 [PR107678] Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.7 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:59:27AM +0000, Wilco Dijkstra wrote: > Hi, > > > On 1/10/23 19:12, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > >> Anyway, the sooner this makes it into gcc trunk, the better, it breaks quite > >> a lot of stuff. > > > > Yep, please, we're also waiting for this patch for pushing to our gcc13 package. > > Well I'm waiting for an OK from a maintainer... I believe Jakub can approve it as well. Yes, I can, but am not sure it is appropriate. While I'm familiar with the unwinder, I'm not familiar with the pointer signing, and AArch64 has active maintainers, so I'd prefer to defer the review to them. Jakub