From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6AC2385840C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:14:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C6AC2385840C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1673439277; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=rGi76EJAUWupGvMRO6Kln4oHrNEgAl5wejp16KhlkLI=; b=YVYYRFJHjIkXVYgw08siAHvQ8M5g5QiM2RplijVyup5H0925DKKgMa/OCzCRdOqgZZbRsI 7Ed4jL/UQPmWrZ8O0PpI/XBiw8idC/rZs3+ynPyqrefnhBcXtTDAyVlxp/VFh17vG63A+S jIVjtym9D725CoIBNafm1iWNOlOON7Y= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-629-NeP9VqojMuiwgbUhkKKa3w-1; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 07:14:34 -0500 X-MC-Unique: NeP9VqojMuiwgbUhkKKa3w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC552101A55E; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.223]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A95D0492B00; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 30BCEUlI1307818 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:14:31 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 30BCEU2E1307817; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:14:30 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:14:29 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: NightStrike Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [committed] testsuite: Add testcases from PR108292 and PR108308 Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 05:10:50AM -0500, NightStrike wrote: > Ok, then: > > /* { dg-do run { target { { ilp32 || lp64 } || llp64 } } } */ > > or even: > > /* { dg-do run { target { ! int16 } } } */ > > Though I'd point out that in your original message, you only cared > about the "important targets". I don't think nonexistent ones where > sizeof(int) == 8 qualifies :) I've committed following after regtesting it on x86_64-linux and i686-linux: 2023-01-11 Jakub Jelinek PR target/108308 * gcc.dg/pr108308.c: Use int32 target rather than { ilp32 || lp64 }. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108308.c.jj 2023-01-06 10:52:24.982461493 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108308.c 2023-01-11 13:04:51.036789536 +0100 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* PR target/108308 */ -/* { dg-do run { target { ilp32 || lp64 } } } */ +/* { dg-do run { target int32 } } */ /* { dg-options "-Os -fno-tree-ccp" } */ int a = 1, *d = &a, f = 2766708631, h; Jakub