From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 773FD3858D32 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:50:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 773FD3858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1675072249; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type; bh=LzLJ2DsK9bM/XTq4iatS4n3nDvtDmdDOuwf1ra3bZhI=; b=bpOIhazzptmnp6QbxJ0s9K4ZKoXYC+SQWyiK+kPlnHngr8iSSbOpxF5V1k9HNPcsJJBrfV en/HFtNXrwec03i1ikK9wm0f0qq6Viu/ppboXdvj1Y9yB/vRxQ2O79lVZS0jvvRVnGbtlq iTDife9mmeR2XxKCsfLqL1y9GdcHt28= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-663-hbSQ4uKTOSOnfy_D7D4-Lw-1; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 04:50:44 -0500 X-MC-Unique: hbSQ4uKTOSOnfy_D7D4-Lw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F2CF3847986; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.223]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06428140EBF5; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 09:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 30U9odeb2821161 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:50:40 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 30U9ob492821160; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:50:37 +0100 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:50:37 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Jason Merrill , "Joseph S. Myers" , Uros Bizjak , Jeff Law , Richard Biener , Richard Earnshaw , Kyrylo Tkachov , richard.sandiford@arm.com Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Patch ping Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.7 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_MANYTO,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: I'd like to ping a few pending patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/607534.html - PR107846 - P1 - c-family: Account for integral promotions of left shifts for -Wshift-overflow warning https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/610285.html - PR108464 - P1 - file-prefix-map: Fix up -f*-prefix-map= (3 variants) https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606382.html - PR107703 - P3, ABI - libgcc, i386: Add __fix{,uns}bfti and __float{,un}tibf https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606973.html - PR107465 - P2 - c-family: Fix up -Wsign-compare BIT_NOT_EXPR handling https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/607104.html - PR107465 - P2 - c-family: Incremental fix for -Wsign-compare BIT_NOT_EXPR handling https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/607145.html - PR107558 - P2 - c++: Don't clear TREE_READONLY for -fmerge-all-constants for non-aggregates https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608932.html - PR108079 - P2 - c, c++, cgraphunit: Prevent duplicated -Wunused-value warnings https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/605965.html - ABI - aarch64: Add bfloat16_t support for aarch64 (enabling it in GCC 14 will be harder) Thanks Jakub