* [PATCH] c++: Failure to delay noexcept parsing with ptr-operator [PR100752] @ 2021-06-09 0:25 Marek Polacek 2021-06-10 19:09 ` Jason Merrill 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Marek Polacek @ 2021-06-09 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Merrill, GCC Patches We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept didn't work as advertised. The following change passes more than just CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT but that doesn't seem to break anything. I'm not passing member_p because I don't need it and because it breaks a few tests. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/branches? PR c++/100752 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.c (cp_parser_declarator): Pass flags down to cp_parser_declarator. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/parser.c | 3 +-- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C | 12 ++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c index d59a829d0b9..5930990ec1c 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c @@ -22066,8 +22066,7 @@ cp_parser_declarator (cp_parser* parser, cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser); /* Parse the dependent declarator. */ - declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, - CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NONE, + declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, flags, /*ctor_dtor_or_conv_p=*/NULL, /*parenthesized_p=*/NULL, /*member_p=*/false, diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9b87ba0cafb --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +// PR c++/100752 +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } + +struct S { + void f() noexcept {} + S &g() noexcept(noexcept(f())) { f(); return *this; } +}; + +struct X { + int& f() noexcept(noexcept(i)); + int i; +}; base-commit: c4574d23cb07340918793a5a98ae7bb2988b3791 -- 2.31.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] c++: Failure to delay noexcept parsing with ptr-operator [PR100752] 2021-06-09 0:25 [PATCH] c++: Failure to delay noexcept parsing with ptr-operator [PR100752] Marek Polacek @ 2021-06-10 19:09 ` Jason Merrill 2021-06-10 21:19 ` Marek Polacek 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jason Merrill @ 2021-06-10 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Polacek, GCC Patches On 6/8/21 8:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator > in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept > didn't work as advertised. The following change passes more than just > CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT but that doesn't seem to break anything. > > I'm not passing member_p because I don't need it and because it breaks > a few tests. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/branches? > > PR c++/100752 > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * parser.c (cp_parser_declarator): Pass flags down to > cp_parser_declarator. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C: New test. > --- > gcc/cp/parser.c | 3 +-- > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C | 12 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c > index d59a829d0b9..5930990ec1c 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c > +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c > @@ -22066,8 +22066,7 @@ cp_parser_declarator (cp_parser* parser, > cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser); > > /* Parse the dependent declarator. */ > - declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, > - CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NONE, > + declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, flags, > /*ctor_dtor_or_conv_p=*/NULL, > /*parenthesized_p=*/NULL, > /*member_p=*/false, Should the other parameters also be passed down? I'd think definitely member_p and static_p, not sure about ctor_dtor_or_conv_p and parenthesized_p. > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..9b87ba0cafb > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > +// PR c++/100752 > +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } > + > +struct S { > + void f() noexcept {} > + S &g() noexcept(noexcept(f())) { f(); return *this; } > +}; > + > +struct X { > + int& f() noexcept(noexcept(i)); > + int i; > +}; > > base-commit: c4574d23cb07340918793a5a98ae7bb2988b3791 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] c++: Failure to delay noexcept parsing with ptr-operator [PR100752] 2021-06-10 19:09 ` Jason Merrill @ 2021-06-10 21:19 ` Marek Polacek 2021-06-11 2:31 ` Jason Merrill 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Marek Polacek @ 2021-06-10 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Merrill; +Cc: GCC Patches On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 03:09:29PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 6/8/21 8:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > > We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator > > in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept > > didn't work as advertised. The following change passes more than just > > CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT but that doesn't seem to break anything. > > > > I'm not passing member_p because I don't need it and because it breaks > > a few tests. > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/branches? > > > > PR c++/100752 > > > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > > > * parser.c (cp_parser_declarator): Pass flags down to > > cp_parser_declarator. > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C: New test. > > --- > > gcc/cp/parser.c | 3 +-- > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C | 12 ++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C > > > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c > > index d59a829d0b9..5930990ec1c 100644 > > --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c > > +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c > > @@ -22066,8 +22066,7 @@ cp_parser_declarator (cp_parser* parser, > > cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser); > > /* Parse the dependent declarator. */ > > - declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, > > - CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NONE, > > + declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, flags, > > /*ctor_dtor_or_conv_p=*/NULL, > > /*parenthesized_p=*/NULL, > > /*member_p=*/false, > > Should the other parameters also be passed down? I'd think definitely > member_p and static_p, not sure about ctor_dtor_or_conv_p and > parenthesized_p. Hmm, as I mentioned in the patch description, I tried, but passing member_p broke a few tests and since it's not needed for this fix I gave up investigating why. I could look into it if you're curious :). Marek ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] c++: Failure to delay noexcept parsing with ptr-operator [PR100752] 2021-06-10 21:19 ` Marek Polacek @ 2021-06-11 2:31 ` Jason Merrill 2021-06-25 20:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Marek Polacek 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jason Merrill @ 2021-06-11 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Polacek; +Cc: GCC Patches On 6/10/21 5:19 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 03:09:29PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: >> On 6/8/21 8:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: >>> We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator >>> in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept >>> didn't work as advertised. The following change passes more than just >>> CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT but that doesn't seem to break anything. >>> >>> I'm not passing member_p because I don't need it and because it breaks >>> a few tests. >>> >>> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/branches? >>> >>> PR c++/100752 >>> >>> gcc/cp/ChangeLog: >>> >>> * parser.c (cp_parser_declarator): Pass flags down to >>> cp_parser_declarator. >>> >>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >>> >>> * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C: New test. >>> --- >>> gcc/cp/parser.c | 3 +-- >>> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C | 12 ++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C >>> >>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c >>> index d59a829d0b9..5930990ec1c 100644 >>> --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c >>> +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c >>> @@ -22066,8 +22066,7 @@ cp_parser_declarator (cp_parser* parser, >>> cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser); >>> /* Parse the dependent declarator. */ >>> - declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, >>> - CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NONE, >>> + declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, flags, >>> /*ctor_dtor_or_conv_p=*/NULL, >>> /*parenthesized_p=*/NULL, >>> /*member_p=*/false, >> >> Should the other parameters also be passed down? I'd think definitely >> member_p and static_p, not sure about ctor_dtor_or_conv_p and >> parenthesized_p. > > Hmm, as I mentioned in the patch description, I tried, but passing member_p > broke a few tests and since it's not needed for this fix I gave up > investigating why. I could look into it if you're curious :). Please. Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] c++: Failure to delay noexcept parsing with ptr-operator [PR100752] 2021-06-11 2:31 ` Jason Merrill @ 2021-06-25 20:42 ` Marek Polacek 2021-06-25 20:47 ` Jason Merrill 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Marek Polacek @ 2021-06-25 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Merrill; +Cc: GCC Patches On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:31:33PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 6/10/21 5:19 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 03:09:29PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > On 6/8/21 8:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > > We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator > > > > in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept > > > > didn't work as advertised. The following change passes more than just > > > > CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT but that doesn't seem to break anything. > > > > > > > > I'm not passing member_p because I don't need it and because it breaks > > > > a few tests. > > > > > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/branches? > > > > > > > > PR c++/100752 > > > > > > > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > > > > > > > * parser.c (cp_parser_declarator): Pass flags down to > > > > cp_parser_declarator. > > > > > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > > > > > * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C: New test. > > > > --- > > > > gcc/cp/parser.c | 3 +-- > > > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C > > > > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c > > > > index d59a829d0b9..5930990ec1c 100644 > > > > --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c > > > > +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c > > > > @@ -22066,8 +22066,7 @@ cp_parser_declarator (cp_parser* parser, > > > > cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser); > > > > /* Parse the dependent declarator. */ > > > > - declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, > > > > - CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NONE, > > > > + declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, flags, > > > > /*ctor_dtor_or_conv_p=*/NULL, > > > > /*parenthesized_p=*/NULL, > > > > /*member_p=*/false, > > > > > > Should the other parameters also be passed down? I'd think definitely > > > member_p and static_p, not sure about ctor_dtor_or_conv_p and > > > parenthesized_p. > > > > Hmm, as I mentioned in the patch description, I tried, but passing member_p > > broke a few tests and since it's not needed for this fix I gave up > > investigating why. I could look into it if you're curious :). > > Please. Turns out those were just trivial changes to the expected error messages. The following patch passes member_p and static_p too: Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? -- >8 -- We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept didn't work as advertised. The following change passes more than just CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT but that doesn't seem to break anything. I'm now also passing member_p and static_p, as a consequence, two tests needed small tweaks. PR c++/100752 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.c (cp_parser_declarator): Pass flags down to cp_parser_declarator. Also pass static_p/member_p. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C: New test. * g++.dg/parse/saved1.C: Adjust dg-error. * g++.dg/template/crash50.C: Likewise. --- gcc/cp/parser.c | 6 ++---- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C | 12 ++++++++++++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/saved1.C | 4 ++-- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash50.C | 2 +- 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c index 096580e7e50..02daa7a6f6a 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c @@ -22170,12 +22170,10 @@ cp_parser_declarator (cp_parser* parser, cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser); /* Parse the dependent declarator. */ - declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, - CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NONE, + declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, flags, /*ctor_dtor_or_conv_p=*/NULL, /*parenthesized_p=*/NULL, - /*member_p=*/false, - friend_p, /*static_p=*/false); + member_p, friend_p, static_p); /* If we are parsing an abstract-declarator, we must handle the case where the dependent declarator is absent. */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9b87ba0cafb --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +// PR c++/100752 +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } + +struct S { + void f() noexcept {} + S &g() noexcept(noexcept(f())) { f(); return *this; } +}; + +struct X { + int& f() noexcept(noexcept(i)); + int i; +}; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/saved1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/saved1.C index 979a05676d2..1deaa93f516 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/saved1.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/saved1.C @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ // Test that the parser doesn't go into an infinite loop from ignoring the // PRE_PARSED_FUNCTION_DECL token. -class C { static void* operator new(size_t); }; // { dg-error "24:declaration of .operator new. as non-function" } -// { dg-error "expected|ISO C\\+\\+ forbids" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } +class C { static void* operator new(size_t); }; // { dg-error "37:.size_t. has not been declared" } +// { dg-error ".operator new. takes type .size_t." "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } void* C::operator new(size_t) { return 0; } // { dg-error "" } class D { D(int i): integer(i){}}; // { dg-error "" } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash50.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash50.C index 286685ac838..4b846cdabc8 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash50.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash50.C @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@ struct A { - template<int> void* foo(; // { dg-error "primary-expression|initialization|static|template" } + template<int> void* foo(; // { dg-error "expected|initialization|static|template" } }; base-commit: 74ebd1297e9cfa9f7d05bfcac5510d4968cc6ba8 -- 2.31.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] c++: Failure to delay noexcept parsing with ptr-operator [PR100752] 2021-06-25 20:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Marek Polacek @ 2021-06-25 20:47 ` Jason Merrill 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jason Merrill @ 2021-06-25 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Polacek; +Cc: GCC Patches On 6/25/21 4:42 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:31:33PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: >> On 6/10/21 5:19 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 03:09:29PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: >>>> On 6/8/21 8:25 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: >>>>> We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator >>>>> in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept >>>>> didn't work as advertised. The following change passes more than just >>>>> CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT but that doesn't seem to break anything. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not passing member_p because I don't need it and because it breaks >>>>> a few tests. >>>>> >>>>> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/branches? >>>>> >>>>> PR c++/100752 >>>>> >>>>> gcc/cp/ChangeLog: >>>>> >>>>> * parser.c (cp_parser_declarator): Pass flags down to >>>>> cp_parser_declarator. >>>>> >>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >>>>> >>>>> * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C: New test. >>>>> --- >>>>> gcc/cp/parser.c | 3 +-- >>>>> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C | 12 ++++++++++++ >>>>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c >>>>> index d59a829d0b9..5930990ec1c 100644 >>>>> --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c >>>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c >>>>> @@ -22066,8 +22066,7 @@ cp_parser_declarator (cp_parser* parser, >>>>> cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser); >>>>> /* Parse the dependent declarator. */ >>>>> - declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, >>>>> - CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NONE, >>>>> + declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, flags, >>>>> /*ctor_dtor_or_conv_p=*/NULL, >>>>> /*parenthesized_p=*/NULL, >>>>> /*member_p=*/false, >>>> >>>> Should the other parameters also be passed down? I'd think definitely >>>> member_p and static_p, not sure about ctor_dtor_or_conv_p and >>>> parenthesized_p. >>> >>> Hmm, as I mentioned in the patch description, I tried, but passing member_p >>> broke a few tests and since it's not needed for this fix I gave up >>> investigating why. I could look into it if you're curious :). >> >> Please. > > Turns out those were just trivial changes to the expected error messages. > The following patch passes member_p and static_p too: > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? OK. > -- >8 -- > We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator > in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept > didn't work as advertised. The following change passes more than just > CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT but that doesn't seem to break anything. > > I'm now also passing member_p and static_p, as a consequence, two tests > needed small tweaks. > > PR c++/100752 > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog: > > * parser.c (cp_parser_declarator): Pass flags down to > cp_parser_declarator. Also pass static_p/member_p. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C: New test. > * g++.dg/parse/saved1.C: Adjust dg-error. > * g++.dg/template/crash50.C: Likewise. > --- > gcc/cp/parser.c | 6 ++---- > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C | 12 ++++++++++++ > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/saved1.C | 4 ++-- > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash50.C | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c > index 096580e7e50..02daa7a6f6a 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c > +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c > @@ -22170,12 +22170,10 @@ cp_parser_declarator (cp_parser* parser, > cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser); > > /* Parse the dependent declarator. */ > - declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, > - CP_PARSER_FLAGS_NONE, > + declarator = cp_parser_declarator (parser, dcl_kind, flags, > /*ctor_dtor_or_conv_p=*/NULL, > /*parenthesized_p=*/NULL, > - /*member_p=*/false, > - friend_p, /*static_p=*/false); > + member_p, friend_p, static_p); > > /* If we are parsing an abstract-declarator, we must handle the > case where the dependent declarator is absent. */ > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..9b87ba0cafb > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > +// PR c++/100752 > +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } > + > +struct S { > + void f() noexcept {} > + S &g() noexcept(noexcept(f())) { f(); return *this; } > +}; > + > +struct X { > + int& f() noexcept(noexcept(i)); > + int i; > +}; > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/saved1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/saved1.C > index 979a05676d2..1deaa93f516 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/saved1.C > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/saved1.C > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > // Test that the parser doesn't go into an infinite loop from ignoring the > // PRE_PARSED_FUNCTION_DECL token. > > -class C { static void* operator new(size_t); }; // { dg-error "24:declaration of .operator new. as non-function" } > -// { dg-error "expected|ISO C\\+\\+ forbids" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } > +class C { static void* operator new(size_t); }; // { dg-error "37:.size_t. has not been declared" } > +// { dg-error ".operator new. takes type .size_t." "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } > void* C::operator new(size_t) { return 0; } // { dg-error "" } > class D { D(int i): integer(i){}}; // { dg-error "" } > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash50.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash50.C > index 286685ac838..4b846cdabc8 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash50.C > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash50.C > @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@ > > struct A > { > - template<int> void* foo(; // { dg-error "primary-expression|initialization|static|template" } > + template<int> void* foo(; // { dg-error "expected|initialization|static|template" } > }; > > base-commit: 74ebd1297e9cfa9f7d05bfcac5510d4968cc6ba8 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-25 20:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-06-09 0:25 [PATCH] c++: Failure to delay noexcept parsing with ptr-operator [PR100752] Marek Polacek 2021-06-10 19:09 ` Jason Merrill 2021-06-10 21:19 ` Marek Polacek 2021-06-11 2:31 ` Jason Merrill 2021-06-25 20:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Marek Polacek 2021-06-25 20:47 ` Jason Merrill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).