From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [committed] libstdc++: Remove constraints from std::optional monadic ops [PR102863]
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 01:25:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXCzdI2CYey5DErb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YXCzEkqqDm2TEQcS@redhat.com>
On 21/10/21 01:23 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>The constraints on transform and and_then can cause errors when checking
>satisfaction. The constraints that were present in R6 of the paper were
>moved for he final F8 revision, and so should have been included in the
Bah, I meant "removed for the final R8 revision, and so should not
have been included ..."
>implementation.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-21 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-21 0:23 Jonathan Wakely
2021-10-21 0:25 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YXCzdI2CYey5DErb@redhat.com \
--to=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).