public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] tree.cc: Use useless_type_conversion_p in tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p while in gimple form [PR105253]
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:28:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlbP/hO62jQTguvh@tucnak> (raw)

Hi!

tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p uses TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT comparisons
or tree_nop_conversion_p to ensure a builtin has correct GENERIC arguments.
Unfortunately this regressed when get_call_combined_fn is called during
GIMPLE optimizations.  E.g. when number_of_iterations_popcount is called,
it doesn't ensure TYPE_MAIN_VARIABLE compatible argument type, it picks
__builtin_popcount{,l,ll} based just on types' precision and doesn't
fold_convert the arg to the right type.  We are in GIMPLE, such conversions
are useless...
So, either we'd need to fix number_of_iterations_popcount to add casts
and inspect anything else that creates CALL_EXPRs late, or we can
in tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p just use the GIMPLE type
comparisons (useless_type_conversion_p) when we are in GIMPLE form and
the TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT comparison or tree_nop_conversion_p test otherwise.

I think especially this late in stage4 the latter seems safer to me.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2022-04-13  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR middle-end/105253
	* tree.cc (tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p): If PROP_gimple,
	use useless_type_conversion_p checks instead of TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT
	comparisons or tree_nop_conversion_p checks.

	* gcc.target/i386/pr105253.c: New test.

--- gcc/tree.cc.jj	2022-04-13 09:44:05.021939106 +0200
+++ gcc/tree.cc	2022-04-13 11:43:25.756747436 +0200
@@ -8427,8 +8427,12 @@ tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p (co
     if (tree decl = builtin_decl_explicit (DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (fndecl)))
       fndecl = decl;
 
-  if (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (call))
-      != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (fndecl))))
+  bool gimple_form = (cfun && (cfun->curr_properties & PROP_gimple)) != 0;
+  if (gimple_form
+      ? !useless_type_conversion_p (TREE_TYPE (call),
+				    TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (fndecl)))
+      : (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (call))
+	 != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (fndecl)))))
     return false;
 
   tree targs = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fndecl));
@@ -8440,12 +8444,15 @@ tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p (co
 	return true;
       tree arg = CALL_EXPR_ARG (call, i);
       tree type = TREE_VALUE (targs);
-      if (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type) != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (arg)))
+      if (gimple_form
+	  ? !useless_type_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (arg))
+	  : TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type) != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (arg)))
 	{
 	  /* For pointer arguments be more forgiving, e.g. due to
 	     FILE * vs. fileptr_type_node, or say char * vs. const char *
 	     differences etc.  */
-	  if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type)
+	  if (!gimple_form
+	      && POINTER_TYPE_P (type)
 	      && POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg))
 	      && tree_nop_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (arg)))
 	    continue;
@@ -8457,8 +8464,11 @@ tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p (co
 	      && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg))
 	      && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (arg))
 	      && targetm.calls.promote_prototypes (TREE_TYPE (fndecl))
-	      && tree_nop_conversion_p (integer_type_node,
-					TREE_TYPE (arg)))
+	      && (gimple_form
+		  ? useless_type_conversion_p (integer_type_node,
+					       TREE_TYPE (arg))
+		  : tree_nop_conversion_p (integer_type_node,
+					   TREE_TYPE (arg))))
 	    continue;
 	  return false;
 	}
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr105253.c.jj	2022-04-13 11:47:52.460016521 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr105253.c	2022-04-13 11:48:23.085588161 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* PR middle-end/105253 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mno-popcnt" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "__popcount\[sd]i2" } } */
+
+int
+foo (unsigned long long *p)
+{
+  int i, cnt = 0;
+  unsigned long long elem;
+  for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+    {
+      for (elem = p[i]; elem; cnt++)
+	elem &= elem - 1;
+    }
+  return cnt;
+}

	Jakub


             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-13 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-13 13:28 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-04-13 13:40 ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YlbP/hO62jQTguvh@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).