From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] tree.cc: Use useless_type_conversion_p in tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p while in gimple form [PR105253]
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:28:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlbP/hO62jQTguvh@tucnak> (raw)
Hi!
tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p uses TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT comparisons
or tree_nop_conversion_p to ensure a builtin has correct GENERIC arguments.
Unfortunately this regressed when get_call_combined_fn is called during
GIMPLE optimizations. E.g. when number_of_iterations_popcount is called,
it doesn't ensure TYPE_MAIN_VARIABLE compatible argument type, it picks
__builtin_popcount{,l,ll} based just on types' precision and doesn't
fold_convert the arg to the right type. We are in GIMPLE, such conversions
are useless...
So, either we'd need to fix number_of_iterations_popcount to add casts
and inspect anything else that creates CALL_EXPRs late, or we can
in tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p just use the GIMPLE type
comparisons (useless_type_conversion_p) when we are in GIMPLE form and
the TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT comparison or tree_nop_conversion_p test otherwise.
I think especially this late in stage4 the latter seems safer to me.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2022-04-13 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/105253
* tree.cc (tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p): If PROP_gimple,
use useless_type_conversion_p checks instead of TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT
comparisons or tree_nop_conversion_p checks.
* gcc.target/i386/pr105253.c: New test.
--- gcc/tree.cc.jj 2022-04-13 09:44:05.021939106 +0200
+++ gcc/tree.cc 2022-04-13 11:43:25.756747436 +0200
@@ -8427,8 +8427,12 @@ tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p (co
if (tree decl = builtin_decl_explicit (DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (fndecl)))
fndecl = decl;
- if (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (call))
- != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (fndecl))))
+ bool gimple_form = (cfun && (cfun->curr_properties & PROP_gimple)) != 0;
+ if (gimple_form
+ ? !useless_type_conversion_p (TREE_TYPE (call),
+ TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (fndecl)))
+ : (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (call))
+ != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (fndecl)))))
return false;
tree targs = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fndecl));
@@ -8440,12 +8444,15 @@ tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p (co
return true;
tree arg = CALL_EXPR_ARG (call, i);
tree type = TREE_VALUE (targs);
- if (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type) != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (arg)))
+ if (gimple_form
+ ? !useless_type_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (arg))
+ : TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type) != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (arg)))
{
/* For pointer arguments be more forgiving, e.g. due to
FILE * vs. fileptr_type_node, or say char * vs. const char *
differences etc. */
- if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type)
+ if (!gimple_form
+ && POINTER_TYPE_P (type)
&& POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg))
&& tree_nop_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (arg)))
continue;
@@ -8457,8 +8464,11 @@ tree_builtin_call_types_compatible_p (co
&& INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (arg))
&& !TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (arg))
&& targetm.calls.promote_prototypes (TREE_TYPE (fndecl))
- && tree_nop_conversion_p (integer_type_node,
- TREE_TYPE (arg)))
+ && (gimple_form
+ ? useless_type_conversion_p (integer_type_node,
+ TREE_TYPE (arg))
+ : tree_nop_conversion_p (integer_type_node,
+ TREE_TYPE (arg))))
continue;
return false;
}
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr105253.c.jj 2022-04-13 11:47:52.460016521 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr105253.c 2022-04-13 11:48:23.085588161 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* PR middle-end/105253 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mno-popcnt" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "__popcount\[sd]i2" } } */
+
+int
+foo (unsigned long long *p)
+{
+ int i, cnt = 0;
+ unsigned long long elem;
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+ {
+ for (elem = p[i]; elem; cnt++)
+ elem &= elem - 1;
+ }
+ return cnt;
+}
Jakub
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-13 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-13 13:28 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-04-13 13:40 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YlbP/hO62jQTguvh@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).