[PATCH] Replace UNSPEC with RTL code for extendditi2.

[PATCH] Replace UNSPEC with RTL code for extendditi2.

[Michael Meissner]

eplace UNSPEC with RTL code for extendditi2.

When I submitted my patch on March 12th for extendditi2, Segher wished I
had removed the use of the UNSPEC for the vextsd2q instruction.  This
patch rewrites extendditi2_vector to use VEC_SELECT rather than UNSPEC.

I have built a power10 little endian toolchain, power9 little endian toolchain,
and a power8 big endian toolchain.  There were no regressions with this
change.  Is it ok to commit to the master branch?  I don't see the need to back
port the change, but I can certainly do so if desired.

2022-03-31   Michael Meissner  <meissner@linux.ibm.com>

gcc/
	* config/rs6000/vsx.md (UNSPEC_EXTENDDITI2): Delete.
	(extendditi2_vector): Rewrite to use VEC_SELECT as a
	define_expand.
	(extendditi2_vector2): New insn.
---
 gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
index a1a1ce95195..c091e5e2f47 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
@@ -358,7 +358,6 @@ (define_c_enum "unspec"
    UNSPEC_VSX_FIRST_MISMATCH_EOS_INDEX
    UNSPEC_XXGENPCV
    UNSPEC_MTVSBM
-   UNSPEC_EXTENDDITI2
    UNSPEC_VCNTMB
    UNSPEC_VEXPAND
    UNSPEC_VEXTRACT
@@ -5083,10 +5082,25 @@ (define_insn_and_split "extendditi2"
    (set_attr "type" "shift,load,vecmove,vecperm,load")])
 
 ;; Sign extend 64-bit value in TI reg, word 1, to 128-bit value in TI reg
-(define_insn "extendditi2_vector"
+(define_expand "extendditi2_vector"
+  [(use (match_operand:TI 0 "gpc_reg_operand"))
+   (use (match_operand:TI 1 "gpc_reg_operand"))]
+  "TARGET_POWER10"
+{
+  rtx dest = operands[0];
+  rtx src_v2di = gen_lowpart (V2DImode, operands[1]);
+  rtx element = GEN_INT (VECTOR_ELEMENT_SCALAR_64BIT);
+
+  emit_insn (gen_extendditi2_vector2 (dest, src_v2di, element));
+  DONE;
+})
+
+(define_insn "extendditi2_vector2"
   [(set (match_operand:TI 0 "gpc_reg_operand" "=v")
-	(unspec:TI [(match_operand:TI 1 "gpc_reg_operand" "v")]
-		     UNSPEC_EXTENDDITI2))]
+	(sign_extend:TI
+	 (vec_select:DI
+	  (match_operand:V2DI 1 "gpc_reg_operand" "v")
+	  (parallel [(match_operand 2 "vsx_scalar_64bit" "wD")]))))]
   "TARGET_POWER10"
   "vextsd2q %0,%1"
   [(set_attr "type" "vecexts")])
-- 
2.35.1


-- 
Michael Meissner, IBM
PO Box 98, Ayer, Massachusetts, USA, 01432
email: meissner@linux.ibm.com

Ping: [PATCH] Replace UNSPEC with RTL code for extendditi2.

[Michael Meissner]

Ping patch.  While this could be held for GCC 13, it would be nice to know
whether to keep this patch (which was asked for in one of the previous patches)
or discard it.

| Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 12:59:28 -0400
| From: Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>
| Subject: [PATCH] Replace UNSPEC with RTL code for extendditi2.
| Message-ID: <YkcvcEhL6LXwYQlG@toto.the-meissners.org>

-- 
Michael Meissner, IBM
PO Box 98, Ayer, Massachusetts, USA, 01432
email: meissner@linux.ibm.com