public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] i386: Fix up ix86_gimplify_va_arg [PR105331]
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:25:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmJYTyEtsqlTwhKM@tucnak> (raw)

Hi!

On the following testcase we emit a bogus
'va_arg_tmp.5' may be used uninitialized
warning.  The reason is that when gimplifying the addr = &temp;
statement, the va_arg_tmp temporary var for which we emit ADDR_EXPR
is not TREE_ADDRESSABLE, prepare_gimple_addressable emits some extra
code to initialize the newly addressable var from its previous value,
but it is a new variable which hasn't been initialized yet and will
be later, so we end up initializing it with uninitialized SSA_NAME:
  va_arg_tmp.6 = va_arg_tmp.5_14(D);
  addr.2_16 = &va_arg_tmp.6;
  _17 = MEM[(double *)sse_addr.4_13];
  MEM[(double * {ref-all})addr.2_16] = _17;
and with -O1 we actually don't DSE it before the warning is emitted.
If we make the temp TREE_ADDRESSABLE before the gimplification, then
this prepare_gimple_addressable path isn't taken and we effectively
omit the first statement above and so the bogus warning is gone.

I went through other backends and didn't find another instance of this
problem.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2022-04-22  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR target/105331
	* config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_gimplify_va_arg): Mark va_arg_tmp
	temporary TREE_ADDRESSABLE before trying to gimplify ADDR_EXPR
	of it.

	* gcc.dg/pr105331.c: New test.

--- gcc/config/i386/i386.cc.jj	2022-04-12 09:20:07.566662842 +0200
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.cc	2022-04-21 12:03:32.201951522 +0200
@@ -4891,6 +4891,7 @@ ix86_gimplify_va_arg (tree valist, tree
 	{
 	  int i, prev_size = 0;
 	  tree temp = create_tmp_var (type, "va_arg_tmp");
+	  TREE_ADDRESSABLE (temp) = 1;
 
 	  /* addr = &temp; */
 	  t = build1 (ADDR_EXPR, build_pointer_type (type), temp);
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr105331.c.jj	2022-04-21 12:09:34.398906718 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr105331.c	2022-04-21 12:09:07.304283903 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* PR target/105331 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -Wuninitialized" } */
+
+#include <stdarg.h>
+
+int
+foo (va_list *va)
+{
+  return va_arg (*va, double _Complex);	/* { dg-bogus "may be used uninitialized" } */
+}

	Jakub


             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-22 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-22  7:25 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-04-28  8:31 ` Patch ping " Jakub Jelinek
2022-04-28  8:39   ` Uros Bizjak
2022-04-28 10:30     ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-04-28 10:31       ` Richard Biener
2022-04-28 13:16         ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YmJYTyEtsqlTwhKM@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).