public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] c, c++: -Wswitch warning on [[maybe_unused]] enumerator [PR105497]
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 19:55:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoQ1+Y275lKujuab@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YnpuhKLgKahGZ4+j@redhat.com>

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:54:12AM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 08:58:46AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 5/7/22 18:26, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > Corrected version that avoids an uninitialized warning:
> > > 
> > > This PR complains that we emit the "enumeration value not handled in
> > > switch" warning even though the enumerator was marked with the
> > > [[maybe_unused]] attribute.
> > > 
> > > The first snag was that I couldn't just check TREE_USED, because
> > > the enumerator could have been used earlier in the function, which
> > > doesn't play well with the c_do_switch_warnings warning.  Instead,
> > > I had to check the attributes on the CONST_DECL directly, which led
> > > to the second, and worse, snag: in C we don't have direct access to
> > > the CONST_DECL for the enumerator.
> > 
> > I wonder if you want to change that instead of working around it?
> 
> I wouldn't mind looking into that; I've hit this discrepancy numerous
> times throughout the years and it'd be good to unify it so that the
> c-common code doesn't need to hack around it.
>  
> Let's see how far I'll get...
 
Now done (r13-575), which makes this patch a piece of cake.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

-- >8 --
This PR complains that we emit the "enumeration value not handled in
switch" warning even though the enumerator was marked with the
[[maybe_unused]] attribute.

I couldn't just check TREE_USED, because the enumerator could have been
used earlier in the function, which doesn't play well with the
c_do_switch_warnings warning.  Instead, I had to check the attributes on
the CONST_DECL.  This is easy since the TYPE_VALUES of an enum type are
now consistent between C and C++, both of which store the CONST_DECL in
its TREE_VALUE.

	PR c++/105497

gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:

	* c-warn.cc (c_do_switch_warnings): Don't warn about unhandled
	enumerator when it was marked with attribute unused.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* c-c++-common/Wswitch-1.c: New test.
	* g++.dg/warn/Wswitch-4.C: New test.
---
 gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc                 | 11 +++++-
 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wswitch-1.c | 29 ++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wswitch-4.C  | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wswitch-1.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wswitch-4.C

diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc
index cae89294aea..ea7335f3edf 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-warn.cc
@@ -1738,8 +1738,8 @@ c_do_switch_warnings (splay_tree cases, location_t switch_location,
   for (chain = TYPE_VALUES (type); chain; chain = TREE_CHAIN (chain))
     {
       tree value = TREE_VALUE (chain);
-      if (TREE_CODE (value) == CONST_DECL)
-	value = DECL_INITIAL (value);
+      tree attrs = DECL_ATTRIBUTES (value);
+      value = DECL_INITIAL (value);
       node = splay_tree_lookup (cases, (splay_tree_key) value);
       if (node)
 	{
@@ -1769,6 +1769,13 @@ c_do_switch_warnings (splay_tree cases, location_t switch_location,
       /* We've now determined that this enumerated literal isn't
 	 handled by the case labels of the switch statement.  */
 
+      /* Don't warn if the enumerator was marked as unused.  We can't use
+	 TREE_USED here: it could have been set on the enumerator if the
+	 enumerator was used earlier.  */
+      if (lookup_attribute ("unused", attrs)
+	  || lookup_attribute ("maybe_unused", attrs))
+	continue;
+
       /* If the switch expression is a constant, we only really care
 	 about whether that constant is handled by the switch.  */
       if (cond && tree_int_cst_compare (cond, value))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wswitch-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wswitch-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..de9ee03b0a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wswitch-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/* PR c++/105497 */
+/* { dg-options "-Wswitch" } */
+
+enum E {
+  A,
+  B,
+  C __attribute((unused)),
+  D
+};
+
+void
+g (enum E e)
+{
+  switch (e)
+    {
+    case A:
+    case B:
+    case D:
+      break;
+    }
+
+  switch (e) // { dg-warning "not handled in switch" }
+    {
+    case A:
+    case B:
+    case C:
+      break;
+    }
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wswitch-4.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wswitch-4.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..553a57d777b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wswitch-4.C
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+// PR c++/105497
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wswitch" }
+
+enum class Button
+{
+    Left,
+    Right,
+    Middle,
+    NumberOfButtons [[maybe_unused]]
+};
+
+enum class Sound
+{
+  Bark,
+  Meow,
+  Hiss,
+  Moo __attribute((unused))
+};
+
+enum class Chordata
+{
+  Urochordata,
+  Cephalochordata,
+  Vertebrata
+};
+
+int main()
+{
+  Button b = Button::Left;
+  switch (b) { // { dg-bogus "not handled" }
+        case Button::Left:
+        case Button::Right:
+        case Button::Middle:
+            break;
+    }
+
+  Sound s = Sound::Bark;
+  switch (s) { // { dg-bogus "not handled" }
+    case Sound::Bark:
+    case Sound::Meow:
+    case Sound::Hiss:
+      break;
+  }
+
+  Chordata c = Chordata::Vertebrata;
+  switch (c) { // { dg-warning "not handled" }
+    case Chordata::Cephalochordata:
+    case Chordata::Vertebrata:
+      break;
+  }
+}

base-commit: 1bfb823e2a7346ef55bd53a5354770599f7a550b
-- 
2.36.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-17 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-07 22:14 [PATCH] " Marek Polacek
2022-05-07 22:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Marek Polacek
2022-05-10 12:58   ` Jason Merrill
2022-05-10 13:54     ` Marek Polacek
2022-05-17 23:55       ` Marek Polacek [this message]
2022-05-18 14:24         ` [PATCH v3] " Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YoQ1+Y275lKujuab@redhat.com \
    --to=polacek@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).