From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] c: Improve build_component_ref diagnostics [PR91134]
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 09:25:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoyIhfJbdPn9PgHH@tucnak> (raw)
Hi!
On the following testcase (the first dg-error line) we emit a weird
diagnostics and even fixit on pointerpointer->member
where pointerpointer is pointer to pointer to struct and we say
'pointerpointer' is a pointer; did you mean to use '->'?
The first part is indeed true, but suggesting -> when the code already
does use -> is confusing.
The following patch adjusts callers so that they tell it if it is from
. parsing or from -> parsing and in the latter case suggests to dereference
the left operand instead by adding (* before it and ) after it (before ->).
Or would a suggestion to add [0] before -> be better?
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2022-05-24 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c/91134
gcc/c/
* c-tree.h (build_component_ref): Add ARROW_LOC location_t argument.
* c-typeck.cc (build_component_ref): Likewise. If DATUM is
INDIRECT_REF and ARROW_LOC isn't UNKNOWN_LOCATION, print a different
diagnostics and fixit hint if DATUM has pointer type.
* c-parser.cc (c_parser_postfix_expression,
c_parser_omp_variable_list): Adjust build_component_ref callers.
* gimple-parser.cc (c_parser_gimple_postfix_expression_after_primary):
Likewise.
gcc/objc/
* objc-act.cc (objc_build_component_ref): Adjust build_component_ref
caller.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/pr91134.c: New test.
--- gcc/c/c-tree.h.jj 2022-05-19 11:48:56.058291437 +0200
+++ gcc/c/c-tree.h 2022-05-23 20:22:05.669515990 +0200
@@ -699,7 +699,8 @@ extern struct c_expr convert_lvalue_to_r
extern tree decl_constant_value_1 (tree, bool);
extern void mark_exp_read (tree);
extern tree composite_type (tree, tree);
-extern tree build_component_ref (location_t, tree, tree, location_t);
+extern tree build_component_ref (location_t, tree, tree, location_t,
+ location_t);
extern tree build_array_ref (location_t, tree, tree);
extern tree build_external_ref (location_t, tree, bool, tree *);
extern void pop_maybe_used (bool);
--- gcc/c/c-typeck.cc.jj 2022-05-19 11:48:56.077291176 +0200
+++ gcc/c/c-typeck.cc 2022-05-23 20:23:44.713515875 +0200
@@ -2457,11 +2457,12 @@ should_suggest_deref_p (tree datum_type)
/* Make an expression to refer to the COMPONENT field of structure or
union value DATUM. COMPONENT is an IDENTIFIER_NODE. LOC is the
location of the COMPONENT_REF. COMPONENT_LOC is the location
- of COMPONENT. */
+ of COMPONENT. ARROW_LOC is the location of first -> operand if
+ it is from -> operator. */
tree
build_component_ref (location_t loc, tree datum, tree component,
- location_t component_loc)
+ location_t component_loc, location_t arrow_loc)
{
tree type = TREE_TYPE (datum);
enum tree_code code = TREE_CODE (type);
@@ -2577,11 +2578,23 @@ build_component_ref (location_t loc, tre
/* Special-case the error message for "ptr.field" for the case
where the user has confused "." vs "->". */
rich_location richloc (line_table, loc);
- /* "loc" should be the "." token. */
- richloc.add_fixit_replace ("->");
- error_at (&richloc,
- "%qE is a pointer; did you mean to use %<->%>?",
- datum);
+ if (TREE_CODE (datum) == INDIRECT_REF && arrow_loc != UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
+ {
+ richloc.add_fixit_insert_before (arrow_loc, "(*");
+ richloc.add_fixit_insert_after (arrow_loc, ")");
+ error_at (&richloc,
+ "%qE is a pointer to pointer; did you mean to dereference "
+ "it before applying %<->%> to it?",
+ TREE_OPERAND (datum, 0));
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* "loc" should be the "." token. */
+ richloc.add_fixit_replace ("->");
+ error_at (&richloc,
+ "%qE is a pointer; did you mean to use %<->%>?",
+ datum);
+ }
return error_mark_node;
}
else if (code != ERROR_MARK)
--- gcc/c/c-parser.cc.jj 2022-05-23 16:16:30.360856580 +0200
+++ gcc/c/c-parser.cc 2022-05-23 20:33:36.683537409 +0200
@@ -9235,8 +9235,9 @@ c_parser_postfix_expression (c_parser *p
if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_NAME))
{
c_token *comp_tok = c_parser_peek_token (parser);
- offsetof_ref = build_component_ref
- (loc, offsetof_ref, comp_tok->value, comp_tok->location);
+ offsetof_ref
+ = build_component_ref (loc, offsetof_ref, comp_tok->value,
+ comp_tok->location, UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
while (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_DOT)
|| c_parser_next_token_is (parser,
@@ -9263,9 +9264,11 @@ c_parser_postfix_expression (c_parser *p
break;
}
c_token *comp_tok = c_parser_peek_token (parser);
- offsetof_ref = build_component_ref
- (loc, offsetof_ref, comp_tok->value,
- comp_tok->location);
+ offsetof_ref
+ = build_component_ref (loc, offsetof_ref,
+ comp_tok->value,
+ comp_tok->location,
+ UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
}
else
@@ -10612,7 +10615,7 @@ c_parser_postfix_expression_after_primar
finish = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->get_finish ();
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
expr.value = build_component_ref (op_loc, expr.value, ident,
- comp_loc);
+ comp_loc, UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
set_c_expr_source_range (&expr, start, finish);
expr.original_code = ERROR_MARK;
if (TREE_CODE (expr.value) != COMPONENT_REF)
@@ -10652,7 +10655,8 @@ c_parser_postfix_expression_after_primar
build_indirect_ref (op_loc,
expr.value,
RO_ARROW),
- ident, comp_loc);
+ ident, comp_loc,
+ expr.get_location ());
set_c_expr_source_range (&expr, start, finish);
expr.original_code = ERROR_MARK;
if (TREE_CODE (expr.value) != COMPONENT_REF)
@@ -13171,6 +13175,7 @@ c_parser_omp_variable_list (c_parser *pa
&& c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_DEREF)))
{
location_t op_loc = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->location;
+ location_t arrow_loc = UNKNOWN_LOCATION;
if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_DEREF))
{
c_expr t_expr;
@@ -13181,6 +13186,7 @@ c_parser_omp_variable_list (c_parser *pa
t_expr = convert_lvalue_to_rvalue (op_loc, t_expr,
true, false);
t = build_indirect_ref (op_loc, t_expr.value, RO_ARROW);
+ arrow_loc = t_expr.get_location ();
}
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
if (!c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_NAME))
@@ -13194,7 +13200,8 @@ c_parser_omp_variable_list (c_parser *pa
tree ident = comp_tok->value;
location_t comp_loc = comp_tok->location;
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
- t = build_component_ref (op_loc, t, ident, comp_loc);
+ t = build_component_ref (op_loc, t, ident, comp_loc,
+ arrow_loc);
}
/* FALLTHROUGH */
case OMP_CLAUSE_AFFINITY:
--- gcc/c/gimple-parser.cc.jj 2022-02-24 15:27:14.718744040 +0100
+++ gcc/c/gimple-parser.cc 2022-05-23 20:27:34.538195175 +0200
@@ -1800,7 +1800,7 @@ c_parser_gimple_postfix_expression_after
finish = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->get_finish ();
c_parser_consume_token (parser);
expr.value = build_component_ref (op_loc, expr.value, ident,
- comp_loc);
+ comp_loc, UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
set_c_expr_source_range (&expr, start, finish);
expr.original_code = ERROR_MARK;
if (TREE_CODE (expr.value) != COMPONENT_REF)
@@ -1848,7 +1848,8 @@ c_parser_gimple_postfix_expression_after
expr.value = build_component_ref (op_loc,
build_simple_mem_ref_loc
(op_loc, expr.value),
- ident, comp_loc);
+ ident, comp_loc,
+ expr.get_location ());
set_c_expr_source_range (&expr, start, finish);
expr.original_code = ERROR_MARK;
if (TREE_CODE (expr.value) != COMPONENT_REF)
--- gcc/objc/objc-act.cc.jj 2022-01-18 00:18:02.827743339 +0100
+++ gcc/objc/objc-act.cc 2022-05-23 23:59:48.134923529 +0200
@@ -2812,7 +2812,7 @@ objc_build_component_ref (tree datum, tr
tf_warning_or_error);
#else
return build_component_ref (input_location, datum, component,
- UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
+ UNKNOWN_LOCATION, UNKNOWN_LOCATION);
#endif
}
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr91134.c.jj 2022-05-23 20:31:11.751001817 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr91134.c 2022-05-23 20:30:45.291268997 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* PR c/91134 */
+
+struct X { int member; } x;
+
+int
+foo (void)
+{
+ struct X *pointer = &x;
+ struct X **pointerpointer = &pointer;
+ int i = *pointerpointer->member; /* { dg-error "'pointerpointer' is a pointer to pointer; did you mean to dereference it before applying '->' to it\\\?" } */
+ int j = pointer.member; /* { dg-error "'pointer' is a pointer; did you mean to use '->'\\\?" } */
+ return i + j;
+}
Jakub
next reply other threads:[~2022-05-24 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-24 7:25 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-05-24 13:43 ` Marek Polacek
2022-05-25 12:24 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-05-24 13:57 ` David Malcolm
2022-05-24 13:59 ` David Malcolm
2022-05-25 12:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YoyIhfJbdPn9PgHH@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=polacek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).