public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>,
	Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] libcpp: Ignore CPP_PADDING tokens in _cpp_parse_expr [PR105732]
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 10:16:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YpCI0AIkjluhu+L8@tucnak> (raw)

Hi!

The first part of the following testcase (m1-m3 macros and its use)
regressed with my PR89971 fix, but as the m1,m4-m5 and its use part shows,
the problem isn't new, we can emit a CPP_PADDING token to avoid it from
being adjacent to whatever comes after the __VA_OPT__ (in this case there
is nothing afterwards, true).

In most cases these CPP_PADDING tokens don't matter, all other
callers of cpp_get_token_with_location either ignore CPP_PADDING tokens
completely (e.g. c_lex_with_flags) or they just remember them and
take them into account when printing stuff whether there should be
added whitespace or not (scan_translation_unit + token_streamer::stream).
So, I think we should just ignore CPP_PADDING tokens the same way in
_cpp_parse_expr.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2022-05-27  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR preprocessor/105732
	* expr.cc (_cpp_parse_expr): Handle CPP_PADDING by just another
	token.

	* c-c++-common/cpp/va-opt-10.c: New test.

--- libcpp/expr.cc.jj	2022-01-18 11:59:00.258972399 +0100
+++ libcpp/expr.cc	2022-05-26 15:39:54.348780446 +0200
@@ -1366,6 +1366,10 @@ _cpp_parse_expr (cpp_reader *pfile, bool
 	    op.op = CPP_UMINUS;
 	  break;
 
+	case CPP_PADDING:
+	  lex_count--;
+	  continue;
+
 	default:
 	  if ((int) op.op <= (int) CPP_EQ || (int) op.op >= (int) CPP_PLUS_EQ)
 	    SYNTAX_ERROR2_AT (op.loc,
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/va-opt-10.c.jj	2022-05-26 15:54:40.279766330 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/va-opt-10.c	2022-05-26 15:54:24.028928687 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* PR preprocessor/105732 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=gnu99" { target c } } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c++20" { target c++ } } */
+
+#define m1(p1, p2, p3) p3
+#define m2(p1, ...) 1##__VA_OPT__(foo)
+#define m3(...) m1(1, 2, m2)
+#define m4(p1, ...) 1 __VA_OPT__()
+#define m5(...) m1(1, 2, m4)
+#if m3(,)(,)
+#else
+#error
+#endif
+#if m5(,)(,)
+#else
+#error
+#endif

	Jakub


             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-27  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-27  8:16 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-05-29 19:54 ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YpCI0AIkjluhu+L8@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=polacek@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).