From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Chung-Lin Tang <cltang@codesourcery.com>,
Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, libgomp] Fix chunk_size<1 for dynamic schedule
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:07:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrsZLiEDsmeWLDpy@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YrsK1usQ6K0yfJ6N@tucnak>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 04:06:14PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:47:59PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> > with the way that chunk_size < 1 is handled for gomp_iter_dynamic_next:
> >
> > (1) chunk_size <= -1: wraps into large unsigned value, seems to work though.
> > (2) chunk_size == 0: infinite loop
> >
> > The (2) behavior is obviously not desired. This patch fixes this by changing
>
> Why? It is a user error, undefined behavior, we shouldn't slow down valid
> code for users who don't bother reading the standard.
>
> E.g. OpenMP 5.1 [132:14] says clearly:
> "chunk_size must be a loop invariant integer expression with a positive
> value."
> and omp_set_schedule for chunk_size < 1 should use a default value (which it
> does).
>
> For OMP_SCHEDULE the standard says it is implementation-defined what happens
> if the format isn't the specified one, so I guess the env.c change
> could be acceptable (though without it it is fine too), but the
Though, seems we quietly transform the only problematic value (0) in there
to 1 for selected schedules which don't accept 0 as "unspecified" and for
the negative values, we'll have large ulong chunk sizes which is fine.
If we really want help people debugging their programs, we could introduce
something like -fsanitize=openmp that would add runtime instrumentation of a
lot of OpenMP restrictions and could diagnose it with nice diagnostics,
perhaps using some extra library and with runtime checks in generated code.
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-28 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-23 15:47 Chung-Lin Tang
2022-06-28 14:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-28 15:07 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-08-04 13:17 ` Chung-Lin Tang
2022-08-04 13:31 ` Koning, Paul
2022-08-26 8:15 ` [PING] " Chung-Lin Tang
2022-09-09 10:08 ` [PING x2] " Chung-Lin Tang
2022-09-13 14:07 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrsZLiEDsmeWLDpy@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=cltang@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).