From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2] testsuite: Add test for r11-4123
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:45:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwPAt31VeMGPUSC/@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+=Sn1=_O8d83ju+5s-c2cs8xOyhTBuZDrZrq1nuT9=YgMhRVw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:16:23AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 9:58 AM Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > r11-4123 came without a test but I happened upon a nice test case that
> > got fixed by that revision. So I think it'd be good to add it. The
> > ICE was:
> >
> > phi-1.C: In constructor 'ElementManager::ElementManager()':
> > phi-1.C:28:1: error: missing definition
> > 28 | ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > for SSA_NAME: _12 in statement:
> > _10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
> > PHI argument
> > _12
> > for PHI node
> > _10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
> > during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg
> > phi-1.C:28:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
> >
> > Incidentally, do you think it's safe to backport r11-4123 to GCC 8
> > (downstream)? Thanks.
> >
> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C: New test.
> > ---
> > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..26cade052e3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> > +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> > +// { dg-options "-O --param early-inlining-insns=14" }
>
> It seems better to put it in g++.dg/torture and remove -O part.
> And then it will be tested for more than before.
Sure, I can move it.
> Maybe even just mark makeArray as always_inline/inline and you might
> be able to remove the param also.
I can't, it doesn't reproduce the issue then.
-- >8 --
r11-4123 came without a test but I happened upon a nice test case that
got fixed by that revision. So I think it'd be good to add it. The
ICE was:
phi-1.C: In constructor 'ElementManager::ElementManager()':
phi-1.C:28:1: error: missing definition
28 | ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
for SSA_NAME: _12 in statement:
_10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
PHI argument
_12
for PHI node
_10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg
phi-1.C:28:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C: New test.
---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..69fb3d7ba38
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "--param early-inlining-insns=14" }
+
+struct Element;
+template <int _Nm> struct __array_traits { typedef Element _Type[_Nm]; };
+template <int _Nm> struct array {
+ typename __array_traits<_Nm>::_Type _M_elems;
+};
+bool logLevel();
+struct LogCapture {
+ void stream();
+};
+struct Element {
+ Element();
+ long data_;
+};
+using ElementArray = array<6>;
+struct ElementManager {
+ ElementManager();
+ ElementArray array_;
+};
+static ElementArray makeArray() {
+ if (logLevel())
+ LogCapture().stream();
+ ElementArray foo;
+ return foo;
+}
+ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
base-commit: b6316324fceaef431799a8b386de5cc9881d6898
--
2.37.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-22 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-22 16:57 [PATCH] " Marek Polacek
2022-08-22 17:16 ` Andrew Pinski
2022-08-22 17:45 ` Marek Polacek [this message]
2022-08-23 6:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwPAt31VeMGPUSC/@redhat.com \
--to=polacek@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).