From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A08553854143 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:47:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A08553854143 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27OIJ1jX012082 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:47:40 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=E4yNIfAOHvnh6k60YpeBwz9Ftyfxdch90pUU9ksRCa8=; b=afnOONMXmP2gX7L6qIkht5C4cgyJ3IuVw/Vlvm8s+bKPo+G4uNGvGIjleLCoWz7uPn3u I9ExJSg2vn6lMg0RM/x776L005KsCPUR6t28QNX3457SPgdCZELH42hcTYtWpuzPhNjO H00lOZega5P0O4aLeAwiMVUFcSixvRR2RqMxBfuOb/tAGsyr1yJuMbzn70pBfgIHa5k5 FndeOmP3h2OqzhLiwSyHMuCHPxtXaT6c33/uLUqrm0e/oweLJteKrBRongYZlKyJ93KI j4RXiE8ICOCyOpUWYdz+njUDp8L6InedI1YlB1PXtrMHg1gYBbdmtbV8sHtpdWpir/qc 1g== Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3j5s5cgr0t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:47:40 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 27OIM7P5005890 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:47:37 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3j2pvjc16e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:47:37 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 27OIlYcY36962610 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:47:34 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF60AE04D; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:47:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050C6AE045; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:47:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-42a4824c-28a0-11b2-a85c-f55c0d5956ce.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.14.243]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:47:33 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 20:47:33 +0200 From: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus To: krebbel@linux.ibm.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IBM zSystems: Fix function_ok_for_sibcall [PR106355] Message-ID: References: <20220817115044.1853371-1-stefansf@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220817115044.1853371-1-stefansf@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: TSnq84PiwsXUECzPG0lHTSOwTqdUZ3Vw X-Proofpoint-GUID: TSnq84PiwsXUECzPG0lHTSOwTqdUZ3Vw X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-08-24_11,2022-08-22_02,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=782 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2208240068 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 01:50:45PM +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > For a parameter with BLKmode we cannot use REG_NREGS in order to > determine the number of consecutive registers. Streamlined this with > the implementation of s390_function_arg. > > Fix some indentation whitespace, too. > > Assuming bootstrap and regtest are ok for mainline and gcc-{10,11,12}, > ok to install for all of those? Meanwhile bootstrap and regtest ran successfully for all branches.