public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix up dump_printf_loc format attribute and adjust uses [PR106782]
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:07:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxB2PjnMoZF41dl2@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2209010905040.5948@jbgna.fhfr.qr>

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:05:41AM +0000, Richard Biener wrote:
> > As discussed on IRC, the r13-2299-g68c61c2daa1f bug only got missed
> > because dump_printf_loc had incorrect format attribute and therefore
> > almost no -Wformat=* checking was performed on it.
> > 3, 0 are suitable for function with (whatever, whatever, const char *, va_list)
> > arguments, not for (whatever, whatever, const char *, ...), that one should
> > use 3, 4.
> > 
> > The following patch fixes that and adjusts all spots to fix warnings.
> > In many cases it is just through an ugly cast (for %G casts to gimple *
> > from gassign */gphi * and the like and for %p casts to void * from slp_node
> > etc.).
> > There are 3 spots where the mismatch was worse though, two using %u or %d
> > for unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT argument and one %T for enum argument (promoted
> > to int).
> 
> Those 3 spots might be worth backporting?  With -fopt-info-* they might
> run into crashes.

Yes, I'll do it soon.

> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
> 
> OK.

Thanks.

	Jakub


      reply	other threads:[~2022-09-01  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-01  8:26 Jakub Jelinek
2022-09-01  9:05 ` Richard Biener
2022-09-01  9:07   ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YxB2PjnMoZF41dl2@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).