From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B54E03858428 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:25:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B54E03858428 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1662650740; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=G2hwGixl9UJIzqnXjs/tvWZ+PqwK7fSV9hAr1+BhqYU=; b=QsQBN4WmrGRQQrZnZGsMya7Pa8CGFNRFl2em7LKILOrmoeXVBEvoTDV6XP41EDvLbvdL9H aPY5UsoFAjbQDdLVCpp4/imTS+OByxiLDizx64vk/KA0EtYeWKTW9duoPCf/wGH5TtaZ9W XmS1BHJWyjCyNRxlPA3hfNaADdKF3+8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-383-pAVAzaz6M9GoWYEikipcSw-1; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 11:25:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: pAVAzaz6M9GoWYEikipcSw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF04C85A58B; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.41]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0CF02026D4C; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 288FPQQu1563732 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 8 Sep 2022 17:25:26 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 288FPPKo1563731; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 17:25:25 +0200 Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 17:25:25 +0200 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Tobias Burnus , gcc-patches , fortran Subject: Re: [Patch] OpenMP/Fortran: Permit end-clause on directive Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <821786f3-ac7b-01e3-a386-f7c082494022@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 05:21:08PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > Otherwise LGTM. Oh, and what Harald wrote, it might be better to split the nowait-4.f90 test into 2, one for all the valid nowait cases and one for the invalid ones, such that the first one can be compile tested all the way through assembly. Jakub