From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 239D638582BF for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 15:51:11 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 239D638582BF Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1662738670; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=YFGhJtoHDS8t14JbIfucZGCuLWQ0JuiyU96tLzsQL5s=; b=DhrWIWXvSBmJx3CgAaz9idUlDt0yXHK7Rka5/uf/ov8nURpZlo337s8di5tcIFRd17PTVH +KbeOwg9N+IkoSldRZSd+Vd6qPaky5Qntb4/zzlL6imLrf6mzt0dBvX2SNonHyhXbzCM2h giVW5el5quspiW8VWYptfNAFMmNZudU= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-167-MPLcNtbPO-WMLPWRvGHN5g-1; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:51:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: MPLcNtbPO-WMLPWRvGHN5g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25FF8805AF5; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 15:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.41]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D984A945D2; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 15:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 289Fp3NM1598577 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 9 Sep 2022 17:51:04 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 289Fp22p1598576; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 17:51:02 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 17:51:02 +0200 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Tobias Burnus Cc: Tom de Vries , gcc-patches , Alexander Monakov Subject: Re: [Patch] libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <57b3ae5e-8f15-8bea-fa09-39bccbaa2414@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57b3ae5e-8f15-8bea-fa09-39bccbaa2414@codesourcery.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:07:28AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > @Tom and Alexander: Better suggestions are welcome for the busy loop in > libgomp/plugin/plugin-nvptx.c regarding the variable placement and checking > its value. I'm afraid you need Alexander or Tom here, I don't feel I can review it; I could rubber stamp it if they are ok with it. Jakub